Literature DB >> 22374427

Evaluation of ER-α, ER-Β1 and ER-Β2 expression and correlation with clinicopathologic factors in invasive luminal subtype breast cancers.

Huiming Zhang1, Zhongtao Zhang, Lixue Xuan, Shan Zheng, Lei Guo, Qimin Zhan, Xiang Qu, Baoming Zhang, Yu Wang, Xiang Wang, Yongmei Song.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Luminal subtype breast cancer is defined as oestrogen receptor (ER)- and/or progesterone receptor (PR)- positive breast cancer. We detected the expression of ER-α, ER-Β1 and ER-Β2 in the tissue samples of invasive luminal subtype breast cancer patients, evaluated the correlations between these ER statuses and prognosis, and tried to clarify whether the status of ER-α isoforms provides clinically useful information further to what is already provided by the traditional ER-α/PR assay.
METHODS: The expression of ER-α, ER-Β1 and ER-Β2 in the paraffin-embedded sections of 162 invasive luminal subtype breast cancer patients was detected with an immunohistochemical staining method. With mid-long-term follow-up, the features of ER-α, ER-Β1 and ER-Β2 status and the correlations between clinical characteristics and the prognosis were analysed.
RESULTS: ER-Β1-positive status was correlated with PR (rs=0.217, p<0.01). The median follow-up time was 92 months (range, 4-98 months). Univariate analysis suggested that ER-Β1 status was significantly correlated to diseasefree survival (DFS) time (log rank=3.98, p=0.046), especially in patients with positive lymph nodes (log rank=6.20, p=0.013). In patients with smaller tumour size (=20 mm), negative ER-Β2 status was significantly correlated to overall survival time (log rank=3.87, p=0.049).
CONCLUSIONS: In invasive luminal subtype breast cancers, ER-Β1 is correlated with good prognosis and could be regarded as one of the factors for evaluating DFS time, especially in lymph node-positive patients. There may be some interactions between ER-Β1 and PR. In clinical practice, besides routine detection of ER-α and PR in invasive luminal subtype breast cancers, immunohistochemical staining of ER-Β1 and ER-Β2 should be considered in order to achieve more useful information. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22374427     DOI: 10.1007/s12094-012-0788-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol        ISSN: 1699-048X            Impact factor:   3.405


  36 in total

1.  Predictors of axillary lymph node metastases (ALNM) in a Korean population with T1-2 breast carcinoma: triple negative breast cancer has a high incidence of ALNM irrespective of the tumor size.

Authors:  Jong Hoon Lee; Sung Hwan Kim; Young Jin Suh; Byoung Yong Shim; Hoon Kyo Kim
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 4.679

2.  Expression of estrogen receptor beta isoforms in human breast cancer tissues and cell lines.

Authors:  Dan Tong; Eva Schuster; Michael Seifert; Klaus Czerwenka; Sepp Leodolte; Robert Zeillinger
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Mouse estrogen receptor beta forms estrogen response element-binding heterodimers with estrogen receptor alpha.

Authors:  K Pettersson; K Grandien; G G Kuiper; J A Gustafsson
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  1997-09

4.  Correlation of mRNA for oestrogen receptor beta splice variants ERbeta1, ERbeta2/ERbetacx and ERbeta5 with outcome in endocrine-treated breast cancer.

Authors:  M P A Davies; P A O'Neill; H Innes; D R Sibson; W Prime; C Holcombe; C S Foster
Journal:  J Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.098

5.  Estrogen receptor beta expression in invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  S Mann; R Laucirica; N Carlson; P S Younes; N Ali; A Younes; Y Li; M Younes
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.466

6.  Breast cancer classification according to immunohistochemical markers: clinicopathologic features and short-term survival analysis in a population-based study from the South of Switzerland.

Authors:  A Spitale; P Mazzola; D Soldini; L Mazzucchelli; A Bordoni
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Clinical importance of estrogen receptor-beta evaluation in breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant tamoxifen therapy.

Authors:  Naoko Honma; Rie Horii; Takuji Iwase; Shigehira Saji; Mamoun Younes; Kaiyo Takubo; Masaaki Matsuura; Yoshinori Ito; Futoshi Akiyama; Goi Sakamoto
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  The favourable prognostic value of oestrogen receptor beta immunohistochemical expression in breast cancer.

Authors:  L Nakopoulou; A C Lazaris; E G Panayotopoulou; I Giannopoulou; N Givalos; S Markaki; A Keramopoulos
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  p53 as a specific prognostic factor in triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Byung Joo Chae; Ja Seong Bae; Ahwon Lee; Woo Chan Park; Young Jin Seo; Byung Joo Song; Jung Soo Kim; Sang Seol Jung
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 3.019

10.  Nuclear and cytoplasmic expression of ERbeta1, ERbeta2, and ERbeta5 identifies distinct prognostic outcome for breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Abeer M Shaaban; Andrew R Green; Suchita Karthik; Yalda Alizadeh; Thomas A Hughes; Lynn Harkins; Ian O Ellis; John F Robertson; Emma C Paish; Philippa T K Saunders; Nigel P Groome; Valerie Speirs
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 12.531

View more
  7 in total

1.  ESR2 gene variants (rs1256049, rs4986938, and rs1256030) and their association with breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Martha Patricia Gallegos-Arreola; Guillermo M Zúñiga-González; Luis E Figuera; Ana María Puebla-Pérez; María Guadalupe Márquez-Rosales; Belinda Claudia Gómez-Meda; Mónica Alejandra Rosales-Reynoso
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 3.061

2.  ERβ Isoforms Have Differential Clinical Significance in Breast Cancer Subtypes and Subgroups.

Authors:  Young Choi; Hadong Kim; Simcha Pollack
Journal:  Curr Issues Mol Biol       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 2.976

Review 3.  Estrogen receptor beta as a prognostic factor in breast cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Weige Tan; Qian Li; Kai Chen; Fengxi Su; Erwei Song; Chang Gong
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-03-01

Review 4.  Aberrant Splicing of Estrogen Receptor, HER2, and CD44 Genes in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Kazushi Inoue; Elizabeth A Fry
Journal:  Genet Epigenet       Date:  2015-12-02

5.  Recent perspectives of breast cancer prognosis and predictive factors.

Authors:  Su-Sheng Cao; Cun-Tao Lu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 6.  Estrogen Receptor β Expression and Its Clinical Implication in Breast Cancers: Favorable or Unfavorable?

Authors:  Young Choi
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 2.922

Review 7.  Estrogen Signaling in ERα-Negative Breast Cancer: ERβ and GPER.

Authors:  Rainer Girgert; Günter Emons; Carsten Gründker
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 5.555

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.