Literature DB >> 22374287

Is limited pulmonary resection equivalent to lobectomy for surgical management of stage I non-small-cell lung cancer?

Maya K De Zoysa1, Dima Hamed, Tom Routledge, Marco Scarci.   

Abstract

A best evidence topic in thoracic surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was: is limited pulmonary resection equivalent to lobectomy in terms of morbidity, long-term survival and locoregional recurrence in patients with stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)? A total of 166 papers were found using the reported search; of which, 16 papers, including one meta-analysis and one randomized control trial (RCT), represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. With regards to 5-year survival rates, the evidence is conflicting: a 2005 meta-analysis and six other retrospective or prospective nonrandomized analyses did not find any statistically significant difference when comparing lobectomy with limited resection. However, three studies found evidence of a decreased overall survival with limited resection, including the only randomized control trial, which showed a 50% increase in the cancer-related death rate (P = 0.09), and a 30% increase in the overall death rate in patients undergoing limited resection (P = 0.08). Age, tumour size and specific type of limited resection were also factors influencing the survival rates. Four studies, including the RCT, found increased locoregional recurrence rates with limited resection. There is also evidence that wedge resections, compared with segmentectomies, lead to lower survival and higher recurrence rates. In conclusion, lobectomy is still recommended for younger patients with adequate cardiopulmonary function. Although limited resection carries a decreased rate of complications and shorter hospital stays, it may also carry a higher rate of loco-regional recurrences. However, limited resection may be comparable for patients >71 years of age, and those with small peripheral tumours.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22374287      PMCID: PMC3352710          DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivs031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg        ISSN: 1569-9285


  19 in total

1.  Towards evidence-based medicine in cardiothoracic surgery: best BETS.

Authors:  Joel Dunning; Brian Prendergast; Kevin Mackway-Jones
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2003-12

2.  Randomized trial of lobectomy versus limited resection for T1 N0 non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer Study Group.

Authors:  R J Ginsberg; L V Rubinstein
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer: summary of updated NICE guidance.

Authors:  D R Baldwin; B White; M Schmidt-Hansen; A R Champion; A M Melder
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-04-27

4.  Wedge resection vs lobectomy: 10-year survival in stage I primary lung cancer.

Authors:  Alexander Kraev; Dennis Rassias; John Vetto; Mikhail Torosoff; Pasala Ravichandran; Christina Clement; Adebambo Kadri; Riivo Ilves
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Comparison of the surgical outcomes of thoracoscopic lobectomy, segmentectomy, and wedge resection for clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  H Nakamura; Y Taniguchi; K Miwa; Y Adachi; S Fujioka; T Haruki; Y Takagi; Y Yurugi
Journal:  Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 1.827

6.  Stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer. A multivariate analysis of treatment methods and patterns of recurrence.

Authors:  D H Harpole; J E Herndon; W G Young; W G Wolfe; D C Sabiston
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1995-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Outcomes of sublobar resection versus lobectomy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: a 13-year analysis.

Authors:  Amgad El-Sherif; William E Gooding; Ricardo Santos; Brian Pettiford; Peter F Ferson; Hiran C Fernando; Susan J Urda; James D Luketich; Rodney J Landreneau
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Intentional limited pulmonary resection for peripheral T1 N0 M0 small-sized lung cancer.

Authors:  Teruaki Koike; Yasushi Yamato; Katsuo Yoshiya; Takehiko Shimoyama; Ryuta Suzuki
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 9.  Segmental resection spares pulmonary function in patients with stage I lung cancer.

Authors:  Robert J Keenan; Rodney J Landreneau; Richard H Maley; Deepak Singh; Robin Macherey; Susan Bartley; Tibetha Santucci
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Survival following lobectomy vs limited resection for stage I lung cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  H Nakamura; N Kawasaki; M Taguchi; K Kabasawa
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-03-28       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  16 in total

1.  The lobar vs. sublobar "limited" resection respiratory function preservation debate: learning to speak the same language.

Authors:  Vasileios Kouritas; Richard Milton
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-04

2.  eComment. The definition of neuroendocrine tumour and sublobar resection.

Authors:  Servet Bolukbas; Michael Eberlein; Joachim Schirren
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-06

3.  Lobectomy vs. segmentectomy for NSCLC (T<2 cm).

Authors:  Nestor Villamizar; Scott J Swanson
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-03

4.  Lobar and sub-lobar lung resection in octogenarians with early stage non-small cell lung cancer: factors affecting surgical outcomes and long-term results.

Authors:  Andrea Dell'Amore; Marco Monteverde; Nicola Martucci; Stefano Sanna; Guido Caroli; Giampiero Dolci; Davide Dell'Amore; Gaetano Rocco
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-11-18

5.  Sublobar resection versus lobectomy in patients aged ≤35 years with stage IA non-small cell lung cancer: a SEER database analysis.

Authors:  Chang Gu; Rui Wang; Xufeng Pan; Qingyuan Huang; Yangyang Zhang; Jun Yang; Jianxin Shi
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 4.553

6.  Surgical outcome of wide wedge resection in poor-risk patients with clinical-N0 non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Hiroaki Tsunezuka; Daishiro Kato; Satoru Okada; Tatsuo Furuya; Junichi Shimada; Masayoshi Inoue
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-07-26

7.  Wedge resection, segmentectomy or lobectomy: the correct choice considering the risk of lobar lymph node involvement.

Authors:  Marco Chiappetta; Elisa Meacci; Dania Nachira; Leonardo Petracca Ciavarella; Stefano Margaritora
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Sublobar resection is associated with better perioperative outcomes in elderly patients with clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Zhenrong Zhang; Hongxiang Feng; Heng Zhao; Jian Hu; Lunxu Liu; Yang Liu; Xiaofei Li; Lin Xu; Yin Li; Xike Lu; Xiangning Fu; Haiying Yang; Deruo Liu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Comparison of survival outcomes between sublobar resection and lobectomies in early-stage lung adenocarcinoma by propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Eunjue Yi; Sukki Cho; Kwhanmien Kim; Sanghoon Jheon
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-03-03

10.  Sublobar resections in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Murat Şahin; Mustafa Bülent Yenigün; Gökhan Kocaman; Elif Duman; Mehmet Ali Sakallı; Murat Özkan; Cabir Yüksel; Ayten Kayı Cangır; Hakan Kutlay; Murat Akal; Serkan Enön
Journal:  Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 0.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.