| Literature DB >> 22373490 |
Hanxu Yan1, Taichi Kashiwaki2, Takeki Hamasaki2, Tomoya Kinjo1, Kiichiro Teruya3, Shigeru Kabayama4, Sanetaka Shirahata3.
Abstract
Entities:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22373490 PMCID: PMC3285010 DOI: 10.1186/1753-6561-5-S8-P69
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Proc ISSN: 1753-6561
Characteristics of the water samples.The characteristics of water samples were determined immediately after the preparation of ERW. ERW, electrolyzed reduced water; CW, activated charcoal-treated water. The pH values were shown as average ± standard deviation (N = 5). The values of DH, DO and Pt NPs were shown the minimum and maximum values after 5 independent measurements.
| MQ (NaOH) | TI-200 ERW | TI-9000 CW | TI-9000 ERW | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | 11.3 ± 0.1 | 11.6 ± 0.1 | 7.9 ± 0.1 | 9.6 ± 0.2 |
| Dissolved Hydrogen (mM) | 0 | 0.2– 0.45 | 0 | 0.1– 0.25 |
| Dissolved Oxygen (μM) | 0 | 3.1– 78.1 | 0 | 0– 21.9 |
| Pt NPs (nM) | 0 | 0.5– 12.8 | 0 | 0– 3.6 |
| Redox potential value (mV) | + 350 | -659 | - | - |
Figure 1Protective effect of ERW on H Cells were treated with water samples (ERW and control ultrapure water with same pH with ERW) and 200 μM H2O2 for 24 h. Cell viabilities were assayed by WST-8 method. N=3, * p < 0.05.