Literature DB >> 22372577

Roscovitine treatment improves synchronization of donor cell cycle in G0/G1 stage and in vitro development of handmade cloned buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) embryos.

Naresh L Selokar1, Monika Saini, Mushariffa Muzaffer, G Krishnakanth, Ambika P Saha, Manmohan S Chauhan, Radheysham Manik, Prabhat Palta, Pavneesh Madan, Suresh K Singla.   

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of serum-starvation, total confluence, and roscovitine treatment on cell-cycle synchronization of buffalo ear skin fibroblasts to the G0/G1 stage and on the developmental competence of cloned embryos. Serum starvation of total confluence cultures for 24 h had a higher (p<0.05) proportion of cells at G0/G1 stage (94.4%) compared with serum starved cyclic and nonstarved confluent cultures (76.8 and 86.0%, respectively), whereas differences between cyclic cells with or without serum starvation were not significant. The proportion of cells at G0/G1 was higher (p<0.05) with 20 and 30 μM roscovitine treatment than that with 10 μM (94.4, 96.4, and 86.6%, respectively), which was similar to that for total confluence (86.0%). MTT assay showed that cell viability decreased as dose of roscovitine increased. The blastocyst rate was significantly higher (p<0.05) when nuclear transfer embryos were reconstructed using donors cells from total confluence, confluence serum starved, and roscovitine-treated (20 and 30 μM) groups (48.8, 48.9, 57.9, and 62.9%, respectively) compared to nontreated cyclic cells (20.2%). However, the cleavage rate and total cell number of cloned embryos were similar for all the groups. The number of ICM cells was improved by 30 μM roscovitine treatment (45.25 ± 2.34). The cryosurvival rate of blastocysts derived from cells synchronized with 20 or 30 μM roscovitine was higher compared to that for total confluence group (33.6, 37.8 vs. 23.8%). In conclusion, treatment with 30 μM roscovitine is optimal for harvesting G0/G1 stage cells for producing high quality cloned buffalo embryos, and that it is better than serum-starvation or total confluence for cell synchronization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22372577     DOI: 10.1089/cell.2011.0076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Reprogram        ISSN: 2152-4971            Impact factor:   1.987


  9 in total

1.  A comparative study on efficiency of adult fibroblasts and amniotic fluid-derived stem cells as donor cells for production of hand-made cloned buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) embryos.

Authors:  Sadeesh Em; Meena Kataria; Fozia Shah; P S Yadav
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2014-12-13       Impact factor: 2.058

2.  Buffalo embryos produced by handmade cloning from oocytes selected using brilliant cresyl blue staining have better developmental competence and quality and are closer to embryos produced by in vitro fertilization in terms of their epigenetic status and gene expression pattern.

Authors:  Sushil K Mohapatra; Anjit Sandhu; Venkata S Neerukattu; Karn P Singh; Naresh L Selokar; Suresh K Singla; Manmohan S Chauhan; Radhey S Manik; Prabhat Palta
Journal:  Cell Reprogram       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.987

3.  Downregulation of DNA methyltransferase 1 in zona-free cloned buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) embryos by small interefering RNA improves in vitro development but does not alter DNA methylation level.

Authors:  Naresh L Selokar; Monika Saini; Himanshu Agrawal; Prabhat Palta; Manmohan S Chauhan; Radheysham Manik; Suresh K Singla
Journal:  Cell Reprogram       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.987

4.  Production of a Cloned Buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) Calf from Somatic Cells Isolated from Urine.

Authors:  Pankaj K Madheshiya; Amol A Sahare; Basanti Jyotsana; Karn P Singh; Monika Saini; Anuj K Raja; Sakshi Kaith; Suresh K Singla; Manmohan S Chauhan; Radhey S Manik; Prabhat Palta
Journal:  Cell Reprogram       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.987

5.  Hope for restoration of dead valuable bulls through cloning using donor somatic cells isolated from cryopreserved semen.

Authors:  Naresh L Selokar; Monika Saini; Prabhat Palta; Manmohan S Chauhan; Radheysham Manik; Suresh K Singla
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Comprehensive Molecular Analysis Identified an SRSF Family-Based Score for Prognosis and Therapy Efficiency Prediction in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Jingsheng Yuan; Zijian Liu; Zhenru Wu; Jiayin Yang; Tao Lv
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 6.575

7.  Establishment of Trophectoderm Cell Lines from Buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) Embryos of Different Sources and Examination of In Vitro Developmental Competence, Quality, Epigenetic Status and Gene Expression in Cloned Embryos Derived from Them.

Authors:  Sushil Kumar Mohapatra; Anjit Sandhu; Karn Pratap Singh; Suresh Kumar Singla; Manmohan Singh Chauhan; Radheysham Manik; Prabhat Palta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Successful cloning of a superior buffalo bull.

Authors:  Naresh L Selokar; Papori Sharma; Monika Saini; Suman Sheoran; Rasika Rajendran; Dharmendra Kumar; Rakesh Kumar Sharma; Rajender K Motiani; Pradeep Kumar; A Jerome; Sudhir Khanna; Prem Singh Yadav
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Global MicroRNA Expression Profiling of Buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) Embryos at Different Developmental Stages Produced by Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer and In-Vitro Fertilization Using RNA Sequencing.

Authors:  Pallavi Goel; Shivani Malpotra; Songyukta Shyam; Deepak Kumar; Manoj Kumar Singh; Prabhat Palta
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 4.096

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.