Literature DB >> 22372472

Gliotoxin contamination in and pre- and postfermented corn, sorghum and wet brewer's grains silage in Sao Paulo and Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil.

L A M Keller1, K M Keller, M P Monge, C M Pereyra, V A Alonso, L R Cavaglieri, S M Chiacchiera, C A R Rosa.   

Abstract

AIMS: The aim of this study was to determine total fungal counts and the relative density of Aspergillus fumigatus and related species in silage samples intended for bovines before and after fermentation as well as to monitor the natural occurrence of gliotoxin in silage samples (pre- and postfermentation). METHODS AND METHODS: The survey was performed in farms located in São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro States in Brazil. In addition, the ability of A. fumigatus strains and related species strains to produce gliotoxin was also evaluated. A total of 300 samples were taken, immediately after opening of the silo (3-5 months) and during the ensiling period. Fungal counts were done by the surface-spread method. Gliotoxin production ability of isolates and natural contamination were determined by HPLC.
RESULTS: All postfermented samples had a total number of moulds exceeding 1 × 10(4) CFU g(-1), with Aspergillus sp. as the most prevalent genus. Frequency of strains, among A. fumigatus and related species, was able to produce gliotoxin was similar in pre- and postfermented samples, except for sorghum, which showed differences between both kinds of samples. The highest toxin levels were produced by strains isolated from postfermented samples. More than 50% of the samples showed gliotoxin contamination levels that exceeded concentrations known to induce immunosuppressive and apoptotic effects in cells.
CONCLUSIONS: The present data suggest that care should be taken because gliotoxin contamination in feedstuffs could affect productivity and also present a health risk for herds. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Gliotoxin was found at quite important concentrations levels in pre- and postfermented substrates and its presence could therefore probably affect the productivity and health of herds. Current conservation and management practices do not avoid contamination with A. fumigatus on silage. Therefore, farm workers should be adequately protected during its handling.
© 2012 The Authors. Journal of Applied Microbiology © 2012 The Society for Applied Microbiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22372472     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05273.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 1364-5072            Impact factor:   3.772


  5 in total

1.  Ensiling process and pomegranate peel extract as a natural additive in potential prevention of fungal and mycotoxin contamination in silage.

Authors:  Sudharsan Sadhasivam; Rula Marshi; Omer Barda; Varda Zakin; Malka Britzi; Abraham Gamliel; Edward Sionov
Journal:  Toxicol Rep       Date:  2022-07-25

2.  Microbiome of rehydrated corn and sorghum grain silages treated with microbial inoculants in different fermentation periods.

Authors:  Mariele Cristina Nascimento Agarussi; Odilon Gomes Pereira; Felipe Evangelista Pimentel; Camila Ferreira Azevedo; Vanessa Paula da Silva; Fabyano Fonseca E Silva
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Effects of Storage Duration and Temperature on the Chemical Composition, Microorganism Density, and In vitro Rumen Fermentation of Wet Brewers Grains.

Authors:  B Wang; Y Luo; K H Myung; J X Liu
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.509

4.  Fusarium and Aspergillus mycotoxins contaminating wheat silage for dairy cattle feeding in Uruguay.

Authors:  Agustina Del Palacio; Lina Bettucci; Dinorah Pan
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 2.476

5.  Effect of inoculants and storage temperature on the microbial, chemical and mycotoxin composition of corn silage.

Authors:  Musen Wang; Shengyang Xu; Tianzheng Wang; Tingting Jia; Zhenzhen Xu; Xue Wang; Zhu Yu
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 2.509

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.