Juanita M Onyekwuluje1, Martin Steinau, David C Swan, Elizabeth R Unger. 1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Division of High-Consequence Pathogens and Pathology, Chronic Viral Diseases Branch, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA. JOnyekwuluje@cdc.gov
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV) 52 is one of the most frequent high risk HPV types found in cervical and anal infections. Reliable and well characterized methods for HPV 52 detection are therefore of great importance. Unfortunately one of the most widely used commercially available HPV typing assays, the Roche Linear Array (LA), detects type 52 only through its XR probe which cross-reacts with types 33, 35 and 58 and fails to give unambiguous detection of HPV 52. METHODS: To address this problem a real-time TaqMan PCR assay for HPV 52 targeting the E6/E7 region was developed and validated, which can be applied as robust duplex assay simultaneously detecting beta-globin as genomic control and reference or as highly sensitive single target detection assay. RESULTS: Optimized primer and probe concentrations produced linear PCR amplifications over seven logs of targets (10(1) - 10(7)). The detection limit for HPV 52 was reproducibly at 10 copies per reaction for the duplex assay format and 5 copies for the single-plex format. The assay was very type-specific and no amplification signal was observed with 10(7) copies of the related HPV33, 35, and 58 DNA. Of 89 samples that tested unambiguously positive for HPV 52 in the LA, 75 were confirmed in the duplex format and 88 in the single-plex format. An additional 100 samples negative for HPV 52 in LA were all negative in both HPV 52 real-time PCR assay formats. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate 92.6% and 99.5% accuracy relative to LA for the duplex and single-plex formats, respectively. In ongoing testing of 18,484 from various studies, 10.8% required the HPV52 TaqMan assay to unequivocally determine the status. Including the HPV 52 duplex assay provides the ability to monitor variations in the cell yield in various methods of sample collection and processing. This additional information is useful in QC monitoring of epidemiologic studies.
BACKGROUND:Human papillomavirus (HPV) 52 is one of the most frequent high risk HPV types found in cervical and anal infections. Reliable and well characterized methods for HPV 52 detection are therefore of great importance. Unfortunately one of the most widely used commercially available HPV typing assays, the Roche Linear Array (LA), detects type 52 only through its XR probe which cross-reacts with types 33, 35 and 58 and fails to give unambiguous detection of HPV 52. METHODS: To address this problem a real-time TaqMan PCR assay for HPV 52 targeting the E6/E7 region was developed and validated, which can be applied as robust duplex assay simultaneously detecting beta-globin as genomic control and reference or as highly sensitive single target detection assay. RESULTS: Optimized primer and probe concentrations produced linear PCR amplifications over seven logs of targets (10(1) - 10(7)). The detection limit for HPV 52 was reproducibly at 10 copies per reaction for the duplex assay format and 5 copies for the single-plex format. The assay was very type-specific and no amplification signal was observed with 10(7) copies of the related HPV33, 35, and 58 DNA. Of 89 samples that tested unambiguously positive for HPV 52 in the LA, 75 were confirmed in the duplex format and 88 in the single-plex format. An additional 100 samples negative for HPV 52 in LA were all negative in both HPV 52 real-time PCR assay formats. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate 92.6% and 99.5% accuracy relative to LA for the duplex and single-plex formats, respectively. In ongoing testing of 18,484 from various studies, 10.8% required the HPV52 TaqMan assay to unequivocally determine the status. Including the HPV 52 duplex assay provides the ability to monitor variations in the cell yield in various methods of sample collection and processing. This additional information is useful in QC monitoring of epidemiologic studies.
Authors: Divya A Patel; Laura S Rozek; Justin A Colacino; Adrienne Van Zomeren-Dohm; Mack T Ruffin; Elizabeth R Unger; Dana C Dolinoy; David C Swan; Juanita Onyekwuluje; Cecilia R DeGraffinreid; Electra D Paskett Journal: J Virol Methods Date: 2012-06-01 Impact factor: 2.014
Authors: Rayleen M Lewis; Lauri E Markowitz; Julia W Gargano; Martin Steinau; Elizabeth R Unger Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2018-03-05 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Mona Saraiya; Elizabeth R Unger; Trevor D Thompson; Charles F Lynch; Brenda Y Hernandez; Christopher W Lyu; Martin Steinau; Meg Watson; Edward J Wilkinson; Claudia Hopenhayn; Glenn Copeland; Wendy Cozen; Edward S Peters; Youjie Huang; Maria Sibug Saber; Sean Altekruse; Marc T Goodman Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2015-04-29 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Sara E Oliver; Elizabeth R Unger; Rayleen Lewis; Darius McDaniel; Julia W Gargano; Martin Steinau; Lauri E Markowitz Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Cecile D Lahiri; Minh Ly Nguyen; C Christina Mehta; Marina Mosunjac; Talaat Tadros; Elizabeth R Unger; Mangalathu S Rajeevan; Jendai Richards; Ighovwerha Ofotokun; Lisa Flowers Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2020-03-03 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Mona Saraiya; Vicki B Benard; April A Greek; Martin Steinau; Sonya Patel; L Stewart Massad; George F Sawaya; Elizabeth R Unger Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2014-05-06 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Elissa Meites; Carol Lin; Elizabeth R Unger; Martin Steinau; Sonya Patel; Lauri E Markowitz; Susan Hariri Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2013-03-13 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Keimari Mendez; Josefina Romaguera; Ana P Ortiz; Mariel López; Martin Steinau; Elizabeth R Unger Journal: Int J Gynaecol Obstet Date: 2013-11-01 Impact factor: 3.561
Authors: Susan Hariri; Elizabeth R Unger; Suzanne E Powell; Heidi M Bauer; Nancy M Bennett; Karen C Bloch; Linda M Niccolai; Sean Schafer; Martin Steinau; Lauri E Markowitz Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2012-10-08 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Elissa Meites; Pamina M Gorbach; Beau Gratzer; Gitika Panicker; Martin Steinau; Tom Collins; Adam Parrish; Cody Randel; Mark McGrath; Steven Carrasco; Janell Moore; Akbar Zaidi; Jim Braxton; Peter R Kerndt; Elizabeth R Unger; Richard A Crosby; Lauri E Markowitz Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2016-06-13 Impact factor: 5.226