| Literature DB >> 22371722 |
Krzysztof Kupisz1, Andrzej Stepulak, Małgorzata Zdunek, Janusz Klatka.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic significance of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) expression in laryngeal carcinoma in relation to clinicopathological features. Special emphasis was placed on examining the relationship of PCNA expression in the primary tumour and PCNA expression in corresponding lymph node metastases obtained from the same patients.Entities:
Keywords: larynx cancer; metastases; proliferating cell nuclear antigen
Year: 2010 PMID: 22371722 PMCID: PMC3278945 DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2010.13509
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Med Sci ISSN: 1734-1922 Impact factor: 3.318
Patient characteristics
| Characteristic | Number of patients |
|---|---|
| Total number | 60 |
| Median age (range) | 55 (34-77) |
| Male/female | 57/3 |
| Tumour grading: | |
| • well differentiated (G1) | 10 |
| • moderately differentiated (G2) | 37 |
| • poorly differentiated (G3) | 13 |
| NM classification: | |
| • T2 | 8 |
| • T3 | 34 |
| • T4 | 18 |
| • N0 | 32 |
| • N1 | 6 |
| • N2 | 15 |
| • N3 | 7 |
| Clinical stage: | |
| • II | 7 |
| • III | 23 |
| • IV | 30 |
Correlation between PCNA index and patho-logical parameters in patients with larynx cancer
| Factor | PCNA index (% positive cells) in primary tumours | Number of patients | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tumour grading: | |||
| • G1 | 31.63 ±11.06 | 10 | 0.006 |
| • G2 | 45.01 ±15.64 | 37 | |
| • G3 | 51.43 ±12.03 | 13 | |
| T stage: | |||
| • T2 | 36.88 ±23.66 | 8 | 0.33 |
| • T3 | 44.70 ±12.99 | 34 | (NS) |
| • T4 | 46.44 ±15.18 | 18 | |
| Presence of lymph node metastases: | |||
| • N0 | 38.84 ±15.54 | 32 | 0.003 |
| • N1-3 | 50.27 ±12.89 | 28 | |
| Clinical stage: | |||
| • II | 31.84 ±20.39 | 7 | 0.036 |
| • III | 42.95 ±13.64 | 23 | |
| • IV | 47.98 ±15.37 | 30 | |
| 5-year survival: | |||
| • alive | 39.23 ±16.06 | 26 | 0.025 |
| • died | 48.11 ±13.77 | 34 | |
Correlation between PCNA index in primary larynx tumour, treatment modality and 5-year survival period
| Treatment modality | PCNA index in primary larynx tumour | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patients survived 5 years | Patients died within 5 years | Statistical significance | |||
| TL ( | 383.7 ±38.73 | ( | 521.3 ±60.61 | ( | |
| TL+RD ( | 318.6 ±55.58 | ( | 571.2 ±65.59 | ( | |
| TL+ND ( | 432.2 ±63.43 | ( | 483.9 ±57.21 | ( | |
| TL+ND+RD ( | 481.8 ±129.1 | ( | 504.3 ±29.17 | ( | |
TL – total laryngectomy, RD – radiotherapy, ND – neck dissection, (Student’s t-test, ∗p < 0.05, ns – not significant)
Figure 1Correlation between PCNA index in primary larynx tumour, treatment modality and 5-year survival period
TL – total laryngectomy, RD – radiotherapy, ND – neck dissection, p < 0.05, Student's t-test