Literature DB >> 22371138

The axial stability of the femur after harvest of the medial femoral condyle corticocancellous flap: a biomechanical study of composite femur models.

Ryan D Katz1, Brent G Parks, James P Higgins.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Free bone or periosteal flaps from the medial femoral condyle are being employed for treatment of recalcitrant nonunions. When harvested in a corticocancellous fashion, these flaps have the potential to compromise the stability of the femur. This study is designed to test the axial stability of the femur after harvest of corticocancellous flaps using a standardized composite femur model.
METHODS: Corticocancellous defects of standardized width and depth (2 cm × 1 cm) were designed with increasing length (3-cm intervals extending from 3 to 24 cm) over the medial femoral condyle of five composite femur models. After harvest of each corticocancellous block, the femur was subjected to an axial force of 9100 N loaded and unloaded over one second using a Mini-Bionix load frame. During the application of force, load and deformation data were collected from the load cell and linear variable differential transducer. To determine changes in stiffness or deformation with increasing flap sizes, analysis of variance with repeated measures was used. If the main effect was found to be significant, a Tukey's test was used to determine differences between specific flap sizes.
RESULTS: There were no femur fractures in any femurs for any flap size. Deformation during load increased as the size of the flap increased (2.19 mm ± 0.062 mm for the 3-cm flap defect) to (2.33 mm ± 0.113 mm for the 24-cm flap defect). Post-hoc testing of deformation shows a statistically significant difference only between the 3-cm flap defect and the 15-cm flap defect (2.19 vs. 2.30 mm) (P = 0.002). The range of stiffness is between 4,339 and 4,697 N mm(-1) . Stiffness tends to decrease significantly (P < 0.001) with increasing flap size. Harvest of flap sizes greater or equal than 9 cm results in significantly lower stiffness compared to the 3-cm flap.
CONCLUSIONS: In this composite femur model, when stressed with supraphysiologic forces, the femur retains its axial stability even after harvest of large corticocancellous flaps from its medial aspect. Statistical significance detected in deformation and stiffness may not be clinically relevant if the femur does not fracture after flap harvest. Such was the case in this experiment. The possibility exists of safely harvesting large flaps from this donor site. Corticocancellous flaps from the medial aspect of the femur may serve as an alternative to standard flaps used in medium and large osseous reconstructions. The size of flap that can be safely raised without compromising the stability of the femur has not yet been delineated.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22371138     DOI: 10.1002/micr.20986

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microsurgery        ISSN: 0738-1085            Impact factor:   2.425


  7 in total

1.  New options for vascularized bone reconstruction in the upper extremity.

Authors:  Matthew T Houdek; Eric R Wagner; Cody C Wyles; George P Nanos; Steven L Moran
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  Vascular and Bone Regeneration of the Donor Site After Corticoperiosteal Flap From the Medial Femoral Condyle.

Authors:  Matteo Guzzini; Domenico Lupariello; Giuseppe Argento; Leopoldo Arioli; Andrea Ferretti
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2020-07-19

3.  Surgical Solution for Total Carpectomy due to Destructive Wrist Pan-Osteomyelitis Using a Free Femoral Condyle Osteocutaneous Flap for Wrist Arthrodesis.

Authors:  Francisco Guillermo Castillo-Vázquez; Ignacio Palafox-Carral; Ranulfo Romo-Rodríguez; Marisol Limón-Muñoz; Efraín Farías-Cisneros
Journal:  J Hand Microsurg       Date:  2021-09-29

4.  Medial Femoral Condyle Free Flap Reconstruction of Complex Foot and Ankle Pathology.

Authors:  John T Stranix; Merisa L Piper; Said C Azoury; Geoffrey Kozak; Oded Ben-Amotz; Keith L Wapner; L Scott Levin
Journal:  Foot Ankle Orthop       Date:  2019-11-07

5.  Immunohistochemical and molecular characterization of the human periosteum.

Authors:  Sönke Percy Frey; Hendrik Jansen; Stefanie Doht; Luis Filgueira; Rene Zellweger
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-05-02

6.  Treatment of a Femur Nonunion with Microsurgical Corticoperiosteal Pedicled Flap from the Medial Femoral Condyle.

Authors:  Matteo Guzzini; Cosma Calderaro; Marco Guidi; Carolina Civitenga; Germano Ferri; Andrea Ferretti
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2016-03-15

7.  Femoral Osteonecrosis after Medial Femoral Condyle Bone Graft Harvest.

Authors:  Jorge G Boretto; Gonzalo Altube; Gerardo L Gallucci; Hector R Narvaez; Pablo De Carli
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-06-19
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.