BACKGROUND/ PURPOSE: This two-part study aimed to investigate compliance with the sepsis resuscitation bundle (SRB) and the barriers to its implementation for patients developing septic shock in the general medical wards. METHODS: In the first part, medical records of patients who were admitted to the intensive care unit from the general medical wards due to septic shock were reviewed. Compliance rates with the six SRB components were assessed. In the second part, responsible junior physicians (first-year and second-year residents) in the general wards and senior physicians (third-year residents and fellows) were randomly invited for questionnaire-based interviews. RESULTS: In the first part, during the 6-month study period, 40 patients were included. Overall compliance with the SRB within 6 h was only 2.5%, mainly due to femoral catheterization (42.5%) and the lack of measuring central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO₂). Delayed completion of SRB components contributed little to the low compliance rate. In the second part, based on the questionnaire results of 71 junior physicians and 64 senior physicians, the junior physicians were less familiar with the SRB guidelines, particularly regarding the meaning of ScvO₂ (p = 0.01) and management of low ScvO₂ (p = 0.04). Junior physicians were also more reluctant to measure the central venous pressure (CVP; p = 0.04) and the ScvO₂ (p = 0.01), and were also less confident with internal jugular vein or subclavian vein catheterization (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Compliance with the SRB for patients developing septic shock in the general medical wards is very low. Besides providing educational programs to improve awareness and acceptance of the SRB, measures to help in central venous catheterization and completion of SRB may be considered. Copyright Â
BACKGROUND/ PURPOSE: This two-part study aimed to investigate compliance with the sepsis resuscitation bundle (SRB) and the barriers to its implementation for patients developing septic shock in the general medical wards. METHODS: In the first part, medical records of patients who were admitted to the intensive care unit from the general medical wards due to septic shock were reviewed. Compliance rates with the six SRB components were assessed. In the second part, responsible junior physicians (first-year and second-year residents) in the general wards and senior physicians (third-year residents and fellows) were randomly invited for questionnaire-based interviews. RESULTS: In the first part, during the 6-month study period, 40 patients were included. Overall compliance with the SRB within 6 h was only 2.5%, mainly due to femoral catheterization (42.5%) and the lack of measuring central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO₂). Delayed completion of SRB components contributed little to the low compliance rate. In the second part, based on the questionnaire results of 71 junior physicians and 64 senior physicians, the junior physicians were less familiar with the SRB guidelines, particularly regarding the meaning of ScvO₂ (p = 0.01) and management of low ScvO₂ (p = 0.04). Junior physicians were also more reluctant to measure the central venous pressure (CVP; p = 0.04) and the ScvO₂ (p = 0.01), and were also less confident with internal jugular vein or subclavian vein catheterization (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Compliance with the SRB for patients developing septic shock in the general medical wards is very low. Besides providing educational programs to improve awareness and acceptance of the SRB, measures to help in central venous catheterization and completion of SRB may be considered. Copyright Â