Literature DB >> 22369829

The use of neural networks in identifying risk factors for lymph node metastasis and recommending management of t1b esophageal cancer.

George Sgourakis1, Ines Gockel, Orestis Lyros, Sophocles Lanitis, Georgia Dedemadi, Ursula Polotzek, Constantine Karaliotas, Hauke Lang.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to establish a prediction model of lymph node status in T1b esophageal carcinoma and define the best squamous and adenocarcinoma predictors. The literature lacks a satisfactory level of evidence of T1b esophageal cancer management. We performed an analysis pooling the effects of outcomes of 2098 patients enrolled into 37 retrospective studies using "neural networks" as data mining techniques. The percentages for lymph node, lymphatic (L+), and vascular (V+) invasion in Sm1 esophageal cancers were 24, 46, and 20 per cent, respectively. The same parameters apply to Sm2 with 34, 63, and 38 per cent as opposed to Sm3 with 51, 69, and 47 per cent. The respective number of patients with well, moderate, and poor histologic differentiation totaled 267, 752, and 582. The rank order of the predictors of lymph node positivity was, respectively: Grade III, (L+), (V+), Sm3 invasion, Sm2 invasion, and Sm1 invasion. Histologic-type squamous and adenocarcinoma (ADC/SCC) was not included in the model. The best predictors for SCC lymph node positivity were sm3 invasion and (V+). As concerns ADC, the most important predictor was (L+). Submucosal esophageal cancer should be managed with surgical resection. However, this is subject to the histologic type and presence of specific predictors that could well alter the perspective of multimodality management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22369829

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  6 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic and surgical resection of T1a/T1b esophageal neoplasms: a systematic review.

Authors:  George Sgourakis; Ines Gockel; Hauke Lang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Prognostic significance of the pN classification supplemented by vascular invasion for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Chong-Mei Zhu; Yi-Hong Ling; Shao-Yan Xi; Rong-Zhen Luo; Jie-Wei Chen; Jing-Ping Yun; Dan Xie; Mu-Yan Cai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Lymph Node Metastases in Esophageal Carcinoma: An Endoscopist's View.

Authors:  Jin Woong Cho; Suck Chei Choi; Jae Young Jang; Sung Kwan Shin; Kee Don Choi; Jun Haeng Lee; Sang Gyun Kim; Jae Kyu Sung; Seong Woo Jeon; Il Ju Choi; Gwang Ha Kim; Sam Ryong Jee; Wan Sik Lee; Hwoon-Yong Jung
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2014-11-30

4.  Modulation of E-cadherin expression promotes migration ability of esophageal cancer cells.

Authors:  Shujun Li; Xuebo Qin; Song Chai; Changbao Qu; Xiaolu Wang; Helin Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  The possibility of endoscopic treatment of cN0 submucosal esophageal cancer: results from a surgical cohort.

Authors:  Bo Ye; Xiaobin Zhang; Yuchen Su; Shuguang Hao; Haohua Teng; Xufeng Guo; Yu Yang; Yifeng Sun; Teng Mao; Zhigang Li
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Radiofrequency ablation for early oesophageal squamous neoplasia: outcomes form United Kingdom registry.

Authors:  Rehan J Haidry; Mohammed A Butt; Jason Dunn; Matthew Banks; Abhinav Gupta; Howard Smart; Pradeep Bhandari; Lesley Ann Smith; Robert Willert; Grant Fullarton; Morris John; Massimo Di Pietro; Ian Penman; Marco Novelli; Laurence B Lovat
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-09-28       Impact factor: 5.742

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.