Literature DB >> 22369404

Role of composite endpoints as an outcome assessment tool in urogenital prolapse.

S Srikrishna1, D Robinson, L Cardozo.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Our aim was to assess the role of composite endpoints as outcome assessment tools in urogenital prolapse. Women undergoing surgery for urogenital prolapse were recruited and followed-up over 1 year. 'Cure' following surgery was defined as: (1)
OBJECTIVE: POP-Q ordinal = 0 (pelvic organ prolapse quantification system); (2) Subjective: PGI-I = 1 or 2 (patient global impression of improvement); (3) Composite endpoint of cure: POP-Q ordinal = zero and patient goal achievement = 60%. Our results showed 'Composite cure' of POP was in 88.7%, while objective and subjective cure were 85.3% and 95.5%, respectively. Defining 'success' or 'failures' based on PGI-I scores was most discriminatory. Quality of life (QoL) was similar in treatment success or failure groups, where cure was measured objectively or using the composite endpoint. Composite endpoints should accurately represent cure as they combine objective measures and patient goals. However, these were not demonstrated as valid methods in defining success of prolapse surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22369404     DOI: 10.3109/01443615.2011.653594

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0144-3615            Impact factor:   1.246


  5 in total

1.  Patient satisfaction and regret with decision differ between outcomes in the composite definition of success after reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Waseem Khoder; Emily Hom; Anna Guanzon; Sarah Rose; Douglass Hale; Michael Heit
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  International Urogynaecology Consultation chapter 1 committee 4: patients' perception of disease burden of pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Dudley Robinson; Lisa T Prodigalidad; Symphorosa Chan; Maurizio Serati; Svjetlana Lozo; Jerry Lowder; Chiara Ghetti; Kathie Hullfish; Suzanne Hagen; Chantal Dumoulin
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  International Urogynecology Consultation: Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROs) use in the evaluation of patients with pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Sara Cichowski; Magdalena Emilia Grzybowska; Gabriela E Halder; Sierra Jansen; Daniela Gold; Montserrat Espuña; Swati Jha; Ahmed Al-Badr; Abdelmageed Abdelrahman; Rebecca G Rogers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 1.932

4.  A composite outcome for neonatal cardiac surgery research.

Authors:  Ryan J Butts; Mark A Scheurer; Sinai C Zyblewski; Amy E Wahlquist; Paul J Nietert; Scott M Bradley; Andrew M Atz; Eric M Graham
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Goal attainment after treatment in patients with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Mamta M Mamik; Rebecca G Rogers; Clifford R Qualls; Yuko M Komesu
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 8.661

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.