| Literature DB >> 22368382 |
Swati Singh, Sanchita Gupta, Ashutosh Mani, Anoop Chaturvedi.
Abstract
Humulus lupulus is commonly known as hops, a member of the family moraceae. Currently many projects are underway leading to the accumulation of voluminous genomic and expressed sequence tag sequences in public databases. The genetically characterized domains in these databases are limited due to non-availability of reliable molecular markers. The large data of EST sequences are available in hops. The simple sequence repeat markers extracted from EST data are used as molecular markers for genetic characterization, in the present study. 25,495 EST sequences were examined and assembled to get full-length sequences. Maximum frequency distribution was shown by mononucleotide SSR motifs i.e. 60.44% in contig and 62.16% in singleton where as minimum frequency are observed for hexanucleotide SSR in contig (0.09%) and pentanucleotide SSR in singletons (0.12%). Maximum trinucleotide motifs code for Glutamic acid (GAA) while AT/TA were the most frequent repeat of dinucleotide SSRs. Flanking primer pairs were designed in-silico for the SSR containing sequences. Functional categorization of SSRs containing sequences was done through gene ontology terms like biological process, cellular component and molecular function.Entities:
Keywords: Humulus lupulus; expressed sequence tag; molecular markers; simple sequence repeats
Year: 2012 PMID: 22368382 PMCID: PMC3283882 DOI: 10.6026/97320630008114
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioinformation ISSN: 0973-2063
Figure 1(A) Percentage distribution of different SSRs; (B) Percentage distribution of mononucleotide SSRs; (C) Percentage distribution of drinucleotide; (D) Percentage distribution of rinucleotide SSRs; (E) Percentage distribution of hexanucleotide SSRs
Figure 2(a) Percentage distribution of different SSRs; (b) Percentage distribution of mononucleotide SSRs; (c) Percentage distribution of drinucleotide SSRs; (d) Percentage distribution of trinucleotide SSRs; (e) Percentage distribution of tetranucleotide SSRs; (f) Percentage distribution of pentanucleotide SSRs; (g) Percentage distribution of hexanucleotide SSRs.
Figure 3Frequency of distribution of contig triplet codon (A) Repetition of contig sequence codon; (B) Repetition of singlet sequence codon.
Figure 4(a) Percentage distribution of amino acids of contig sequences; (b) percentage distribution of amino acids of singlet sequences.
Figure 5(a) Percentage frequency of polar & non-polar amino acids; (b) Percentage frequency of hydrop hilic & hydrophobic amino acids; (C) Percentage frequency of aromatic & aliphatic amino acids
Figure 6a) Percentage frequency of polar & non-polar amino acids; b) Percentage frequency of hydrophilic & hydrophilic amino acids; c) Percentage frequency of aromatic & aliphatic amino acids.