Literature DB >> 22366592

Surgical cytoreduction in patients with metastatic uterine leiomyosarcoma at the time of initial diagnosis.

Mario M Leitao1, Oliver Zivanovic, Dennis S Chi, Martee L Hensley, Roisin O'Cearbhaill, Robert A Soslow, Richard R Barakat.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether cytoreduction is associated with improved outcome in patients newly diagnosed with metastatic uterine leiomyosarcoma (LMS).
METHODS: We retrospectively identified all patients treated at our institution for high-grade uterine LMS with extrauterine disease at the time of initial diagnosis from 7/1/82 to 7/31/07. Pattern of disease spread was classified as intraperitoneal (IP) or extraperitoneal (EP). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined from date of initial surgery using Kaplan-Meier estimates.
RESULTS: We identified 96 cases. Median age was 54 years (range, 23-81). IP disease was seen in 48 (50%) and EP in 48 (50%). A complete gross resection of all tumor was achieved in 41/84 (49%). Recurrence or progression was noted in 93 (97%); 81 (84%) have died. Median PFS and OS for the entire cohort was 9.7 months (range, 6.7-10.9) and 20.2 months (range, 15.5-24.8), respectively. All 8 non-surgical cases died within 30 months of diagnosis. Median PFS was 14.2 months (range, 11.4-16.9) for those with a complete gross resection versus 6.8 months (range, 4.1-9.5) for those with any residual disease (P=0.002). Median OS was 31.9 months (range, 3.3-60.4) versus 20.2 months (range, 11.8-28.6), respectively (P=0.04). On multivariate analysis, no residual disease was independently associated with PFS when adjusting for disease distribution (IP vs EP) and the use of chemotherapy but not OS.
CONCLUSIONS: Surgical cytoreduction of metastatic uterine LMS was independently associated with PFS but not OS in cases selected for surgery. The improvement in PFS must be weighed against the morbidity of surgery.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22366592     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.02.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  17 in total

Review 1.  Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) consensus review: uterine and ovarian leiomyosarcomas.

Authors:  Martee L Hensley; Brigitte A Barrette; Klaus Baumann; David Gaffney; Anne L Hamilton; Jae-Weon Kim; Johanna U Maenpaa; Patricia Pautier; Nadeem Ahmad Siddiqui; Anneke M Westermann; Isabelle Ray-Coquard
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.437

2.  Secondary surgical resection for patients with recurrent uterine leiomyosarcoma.

Authors:  Paulina Cybulska; Vasileios Sioulas; Theofano Orfanelli; Oliver Zivanovic; Jennifer J Mueller; Vance A Broach; Kara C Long Roche; Yukio Sonoda; Martee L Hensley; Roisin E O'Cearbhaill; Dennis S Chi; Kaled M Alektiar; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Mario M Leitao
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Improved clinical trial enrollments for uterine leiomyosarcoma patients after gynecologic oncology partnership with a sarcoma center.

Authors:  S E S Lange; J Liu; D R Adkins; M A Powell; B A Van Tine; D G Mutch
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 4.  Current and future options in the management and treatment of uterine sarcoma.

Authors:  Khalid El-Khalfaoui; Andreas du Bois; Florian Heitz; Christian Kurzeder; Jalid Sehouli; Philipp Harter
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 8.168

Review 5.  Soft Tissue and Uterine Leiomyosarcoma.

Authors:  Suzanne George; César Serrano; Martee L Hensley; Isabelle Ray-Coquard
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Uterine leiomyosarcoma management, outcome, and associated molecular biomarkers: a single institution's experience.

Authors:  Kristelle Lusby; Kari Brewer Savannah; Elizabeth G Demicco; Yiqun Zhang; Markus Ph Ghadimi; Eric D Young; Chiara Colombo; Ryan Lam; Tugce E Dogan; Jason L Hornick; Alexander J Lazar; Kelly K Hunt; Matthew L Anderson; Chad J Creighton; Dina Lev; Raphael E Pollock
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-01-20       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 7.  Options for Adjuvant Therapy for Uterine Leiomyosarcoma.

Authors:  Claire F Friedman; Martee L Hensley
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2018-02-08

Review 8.  The role of adjuvant therapy in uterine leiomyosarcoma.

Authors:  Jennifer A Ducie; Mario M Leitao
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 4.512

9.  Locally-advanced unresected uterine leiomyosarcoma with triple-modality treatment combining radiotherapy, chemotherapy and hyperthermia: A case report.

Authors:  Aya Shirafuji; Akiko Shinagawa; Tetsuji Kurokawa; Yoshio Yoshida
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 2.967

10.  Giant leiomyosarcoma: A case report.

Authors:  Taylan Senol; Ilker Kahramanoglu; Bahar Muezzinoglu; Izzet Yucesoy
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2015-12-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.