Literature DB >> 22365484

The Active Straight Leg Raise test in lumbopelvic pain during pregnancy.

Jan M A Mens1, Yvonne H Huis In 't Veld, Annelies Pool-Goudzwaard.   

Abstract

Although many properties of the Active Straight Leg Raise (ASLR) test as a diagnostic test in lumbopelvic pain (LPP) are well documented, various elements are lacking. A cross-sectional study was performed to compute sensitivity and specificity, to assess the advantages and disadvantages of various cutoff points, to analyze the relation between the ASLR test and the Posterior Pelvic Pain Provocation (PPPP) test, and to investigate the relation with confounders. Data of 110 women with LPP and 72 without LPP were available. The advantages and disadvantages of four cutoff points of ASLR, and combinations of the ASLR and PPPP, were investigated by comparing sensitivity, specificity and area under the curves (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC). The influence of the site of pain was analyzed by means of AUC. The relation with confounders was measured using Pearson correlation coefficients. Results show that for diagnostic use the best cutoff for the ASLR test in pregnancy is between score 0 and 1. Specificity of the ASLR test is good (88%). Sensitivity for all types of LPP during pregnancy is moderate (54%), and is larger in case of more pain and disability. When combined with the PPPP test, sensitivity of the ASLR test is larger (68%). Isolated symphyseal pain, isolated low back pain and isolated coccyx pain are not diagnosed by these two tests. The ASLR test is not influenced by age, number of previous deliveries, BMI, cause of LPP (pregnancy-related or not), the existence of urinary incontinence and/or level of fatigue.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22365484     DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2012.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Man Ther        ISSN: 1356-689X


  7 in total

1.  Fatigability of the Lumbopelvic Stabilizing Muscles in Women 8 and 26 Weeks Postpartum.

Authors:  Rita E Deering; Jonathon Senefeld; Tatyana Pashibin; Donald A Neumann; Meredith Cruz; Sandra K Hunter
Journal:  J Womens Health Phys Therap       Date:  2018 Sep-Dec

Review 2.  Interventions for preventing and treating low-back and pelvic pain during pregnancy.

Authors:  Sarah D Liddle; Victoria Pennick
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-09-30

Review 3.  Pelvic Girdle Pain during or after Pregnancy: a review of recent evidence and a clinical care path proposal.

Authors:  E H Verstraete; G Vanderstraeten; W Parewijck
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2013

4.  The transverse abdominal muscle is excessively active during active straight leg raising in pregnancy-related posterior pelvic girdle pain: an observational study.

Authors:  Jan M A Mens; Annelies Pool-Goudzwaard
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Prevalence of pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain and associated factors in Australia: a cross-sectional study protocol.

Authors:  Dragana Ceprnja; Lucinda Chipchase; Amitabh Gupta
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Protocol for the development of a core outcome set for pelvic girdle pain, including methods for measuring the outcomes: the PGP-COS study.

Authors:  Francesca Wuytack; Annelie Gutke; Britt Stuge; Siv Mørkved; Christina Olsson; Hilde Stendal Robinson; Nina K Vøllestad; Birgitta Öberg; Lena Nilsson Wikmar; Juan Jose Saldaña Mena; Valerie Smith
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 4.615

7.  The Efficacy of Lumbar Support on Pain, Disability, and Motor Control in Women With Postpartum Pelvic Girdle Pain: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Fahimeh-Sadat Jafarian; Mahmonir Jafari-Harandi; Gillian Yeowell; Ebrahim Sadeghi-Demneh
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2022-07-20
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.