OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of a home-based intensive exercise program to improve physical health of frail elderly patients scheduled for elective total hip arthroplasty (THA). DESIGN: Single-blind pilot randomized controlled trial. SETTING:Patients' homes and a general hospital in The Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: Frail patients (N=30) older than 65 years. INTERVENTION: A preoperative, home-based program supervised by an experienced physical therapist to train functional activities and walking capacity. The control group received usual care consisting of 1 session of instructions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Feasibility was determined on the basis of adherence to treatment, patient satisfaction, adverse events, walking distance (measured with a pedometer), and intensity of exercise (evaluated with the Borg scale). Preliminary pre- and postoperative effectiveness was determined by the Timed Up & Go (TUG) test, 6-minute walk test (6MWT), Chair Rise Time, and self-reported measures of functions, activities, and participation. RESULTS: Patient satisfaction and adherence to the training were good (median=5 on a 5-point Likert scale) and no serious adverse events occurred. The Borg score during training was 14 (range, 13-16). Preoperative clinical relevant differences on the TUG test (2.9 s; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.9 to 6.6) and significant differences on the 6MWT (41 m; 95% CI, 8 to 74) were found between groups. CONCLUSIONS:Intensive preoperative training at home is feasible for frail elderly patients waiting for THA and produces relevant changes in functional health. A larger multicenter randomized controlled trial is in progress to investigate the (cost-)effectiveness of preoperative training.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of a home-based intensive exercise program to improve physical health of frail elderly patients scheduled for elective total hip arthroplasty (THA). DESIGN: Single-blind pilot randomized controlled trial. SETTING:Patients' homes and a general hospital in The Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: Frail patients (N=30) older than 65 years. INTERVENTION: A preoperative, home-based program supervised by an experienced physical therapist to train functional activities and walking capacity. The control group received usual care consisting of 1 session of instructions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Feasibility was determined on the basis of adherence to treatment, patient satisfaction, adverse events, walking distance (measured with a pedometer), and intensity of exercise (evaluated with the Borg scale). Preliminary pre- and postoperative effectiveness was determined by the Timed Up & Go (TUG) test, 6-minute walk test (6MWT), Chair Rise Time, and self-reported measures of functions, activities, and participation. RESULTS:Patient satisfaction and adherence to the training were good (median=5 on a 5-point Likert scale) and no serious adverse events occurred. The Borg score during training was 14 (range, 13-16). Preoperative clinical relevant differences on the TUG test (2.9 s; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.9 to 6.6) and significant differences on the 6MWT (41 m; 95% CI, 8 to 74) were found between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Intensive preoperative training at home is feasible for frail elderly patients waiting for THA and produces relevant changes in functional health. A larger multicenter randomized controlled trial is in progress to investigate the (cost-)effectiveness of preoperative training.
Authors: R Likar; W Jaksch; T Aigmüller; M Brunner; T Cohnert; J Dieber; W Eisner; S Geyrhofer; G Grögl; F Herbst; R Hetterle; F Javorsky; H G Kress; O Kwasny; S Madersbacher; H Mächler; R Mittermair; J Osterbrink; B Stöckl; M Sulzbacher; B Taxer; B Todoroff; A Tuchmann; A Wicker; A Sandner-Kiesling Journal: Schmerz Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 1.107
Authors: G van der Sluis; R A Goldbohm; R Bimmel; F Galindo Garre; J Elings; T J Hoogeboom; N L U van Meeteren Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2015-04-16 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Thomas J Hoogeboom; Jaap J Dronkers; Erik H J Hulzebos; Nico L U van Meeteren Journal: Curr Opin Anaesthesiol Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 2.706
Authors: Sietske Poortinga; Inge van den Akker-Scheek; Sjoerd K Bulstra; Roy E Stewart; Martin Stevens Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-12-23 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Giuseppe Barone; Raffaele Zinno; Erika Pinelli; Francesco Benvenuti; Laura Bragonzoni Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-23 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Rachel Perry; Lauren J Scott; Alison Richards; Anne M Haase; Jelena Savović; Andrew R Ness; Charlotte Atkinson; Jessica Harris; Lucy Culliford; Sanjoy Shah; Maria Pufulete Journal: Syst Rev Date: 2016-05-23
Authors: Rachael Powell; Neil W Scott; Anne Manyande; Julie Bruce; Claus Vögele; Lucie M T Byrne-Davis; Mary Unsworth; Christian Osmer; Marie Johnston Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2016-05-26