OBJECTIVE: U.S. and Canadian data demonstrate decreasing inpatient days, increasing nonurgent emergency department (ED) visits, and short supply of child psychiatrists. Our study aims to determine whether aftercare reduces ED visits and/or readmission in adolescents with first psychiatric hospitalization. METHOD: We conducted a population-based cohort analysis using linked health administrative databases with accrual from April 1, 2002, to March 1, 2004. The study cohort included all 15- to 19-year-old adolescents with first psychiatric admission. Adolescents with and without aftercare in the month post-discharge were matched on their propensity to receive aftercare. Our primary outcome was time to first psychiatric ED visit or readmission. Secondary outcomes were time to first psychiatric ED visit and readmission, separately. RESULTS: We identified 4,472 adolescents with first-time psychiatric admission. Of these, 57% had aftercare in the month post-discharge. Propensity-score-based matching, which accounted for each individual's propensity for aftercare, produced a cohort of 3,004 adolescents. In matched analyses, relative to those with no aftercare in the month post-discharge, those with aftercare had increased likelihood of combined outcome (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.05-1.42), and readmission (HR = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.14-1.66), but not ED visits (HR = 1.14, 95% CI = 0.95-1.37). CONCLUSIONS: Our results are provocative: we found that aftercare in the month post-discharge increased the likelihood of readmission but not ED visit. Over and above confounding by severity and Canadian/U.S. systems differences, our results may indicate a relative lack of psychiatric services for youth. Our results point to the need for improved data capture of pediatric mental health service use. Copyright Â
OBJECTIVE: U.S. and Canadian data demonstrate decreasing inpatient days, increasing nonurgent emergency department (ED) visits, and short supply of child psychiatrists. Our study aims to determine whether aftercare reduces ED visits and/or readmission in adolescents with first psychiatric hospitalization. METHOD: We conducted a population-based cohort analysis using linked health administrative databases with accrual from April 1, 2002, to March 1, 2004. The study cohort included all 15- to 19-year-old adolescents with first psychiatric admission. Adolescents with and without aftercare in the month post-discharge were matched on their propensity to receive aftercare. Our primary outcome was time to first psychiatric ED visit or readmission. Secondary outcomes were time to first psychiatric ED visit and readmission, separately. RESULTS: We identified 4,472 adolescents with first-time psychiatric admission. Of these, 57% had aftercare in the month post-discharge. Propensity-score-based matching, which accounted for each individual's propensity for aftercare, produced a cohort of 3,004 adolescents. In matched analyses, relative to those with no aftercare in the month post-discharge, those with aftercare had increased likelihood of combined outcome (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.05-1.42), and readmission (HR = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.14-1.66), but not ED visits (HR = 1.14, 95% CI = 0.95-1.37). CONCLUSIONS: Our results are provocative: we found that aftercare in the month post-discharge increased the likelihood of readmission but not ED visit. Over and above confounding by severity and Canadian/U.S. systems differences, our results may indicate a relative lack of psychiatric services for youth. Our results point to the need for improved data capture of pediatric mental health service use. Copyright Â
Authors: Matthew S Phillips; Danielle L Steelesmith; John V Campo; Taniya Pradhan; Cynthia A Fontanella Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2019-06-03 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Stephanie Doupnik; Jonathan Rodean; Bonnie T Zima; Tumaini R Coker; Diana Worsley; Kris P Rehm; James C Gay; Matt Hall; Steve Marcus Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: Michelle Y Hamline; Rebecca L Speier; Paul Dai Vu; Daniel Tancredi; Alia R Broman; Lisa N Rasmussen; Brian P Tullius; Ulfat Shaikh; Su-Ting T Li Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2018-10-23 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Sima Gandhi; Maria Chiu; Kelvin Lam; John C Cairney; Astrid Guttmann; Paul Kurdyak Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 4.356
Authors: Victoria W Joyce; Christopher D King; Carol C Nash; Lauren A M Lebois; Kerry J Ressler; Ralph J Buonopane Journal: Adm Policy Ment Health Date: 2019-11
Authors: Thomas E Smith; Morgan Haselden; Tom Corbeil; Melanie M Wall; Fei Tang; Susan M Essock; Eric Frimpong; Matthew L Goldman; Franco Mascayano; Marleen Radigan; Matthew Schneider; Rui Wang; Lisa B Dixon; Mark Olfson Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2021-03-04 Impact factor: 3.084