Literature DB >> 22365418

The use of RapidArc volumetric-modulated arc therapy to deliver stereotactic radiosurgery and stereotactic body radiotherapy to intracranial and extracranial targets.

Dante E Roa1, Daniel C Schiffner, Juying Zhang, Salam N Dietrich, Jeffrey V Kuo, Jason Wong, Nilam S Ramsinghani, Muthana S A L Al-Ghazi.   

Abstract

Twenty-three targets in 16 patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) were analyzed in terms of dosimetric homogeneity, target conformity, organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing, monitor unit (MU) usage, and beam-on time per fraction using RapidArc volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) vs. multifield sliding-window intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Patients underwent computed tomography simulation with site-specific immobilization. Magnetic resonance imaging fusion and optical tracking were incorporated as clinically indicated. Treatment planning was performed using Eclipse v8.6 to generate sliding-window IMRT and 1-arc and 2-arc RapidArc plans. Dosimetric parameters used for target analysis were RTOG conformity index (CI(RTOG)), homogeneity index (HI(RTOG)), inverse Paddick Conformity Index (PCI), D(mean) and D5-D95. OAR sparing was analyzed in terms of D(max) and D(mean). Treatment delivery was evaluated based on measured beam-on times delivered on a Varian Trilogy linear accelerator and recorded MU values. Dosimetric conformity, homogeneity, and OAR sparing were comparable between IMRT, 1-arc RapidArc and 2-arc RapidArc plans. Mean beam-on times ± SD for IMRT and 1-arc and 2-arc treatments were 10.5 ± 7.3, 2.6 ± 1.6, and 3.0 ± 1.1 minutes, respectively. Mean MUs were 3041, 1774, and 1676 for IMRT, 1-, and 2-arc plans, respectively. Although dosimetric conformity, homogeneity, and OAR sparing were similar between these techniques, SRS and SBRT fractions treated with RapidArc were delivered with substantially less beam-on time and fewer MUs than IMRT. The rapid delivery of SRS and SBRT with RapidArc improved workflow on the linac with these otherwise time-consuming treatments and limited the potential for intrafraction organ and patient motion, which can cause significant dosimetric errors. These clinically important advantages make image-guided RapidArc useful in the delivery of SRS and SBRT to intracranial and extracranial targets. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22365418     DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2011.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Dosim        ISSN: 1873-4022            Impact factor:   1.482


  27 in total

1.  Simultaneous integrated vs. sequential boost in VMAT radiotherapy of high-grade gliomas.

Authors:  Mostafa Farzin; Michael Molls; Sabrina Astner; Ina-Christine Rondak; Markus Oechsner
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Stereotactic radiosurgery of glomus jugulare tumors: current concepts, recent advances and future perspectives.

Authors:  Omer Sager; Ferrat Dincoglan; Murat Beyzadeoglu
Journal:  CNS Oncol       Date:  2015

3.  Defining functional changes in the brain caused by targeted stereotaxic radiosurgery.

Authors:  Vipan K Parihar; Munjal M Acharya; Dante E Roa; Omar Bosch; Lori-Ann Christie; Charles L Limoli
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 1.241

4.  Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) make a difference in retro-orbital irradiation treatment of patients with bilateral Graves' ophthalmopathy. Comparative analysis of dosimetric parameters from different radiation techniques.

Authors:  Iñigo San-Miguel; Ruth Carmona; Luis Luque; Raquel Cabrera; Marta Lloret; Francisco Rutllan; Pedro Carlos Lara
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2016-05-07

Review 5.  Volumetric-modulated arc therapy with RapidArc(®): An evaluation of treatment delivery efficiency.

Authors:  Beatriz E Amendola; Marco Amendola; Naipy Perez; Alejandro Iglesias; Xiaodong Wu
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2013-08-17

6.  Single-Isocenter Multiple-Target Stereotactic Radiosurgery: Risk of Compromised Coverage.

Authors:  Justin Roper; Vorakarn Chanyavanich; Gregory Betzel; Jeffrey Switchenko; Anees Dhabaan
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 7.  Stereotactic radiosurgery alone for multiple brain metastases? A review of clinical and technical issues.

Authors:  Arjun Sahgal; Mark Ruschin; Lijun Ma; Wilko Verbakel; David Larson; Paul D Brown
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 12.300

8.  Radiotherapy infrastructure and human resources in Switzerland : Present status and projected computations for 2020.

Authors:  Niloy Ranjan Datta; Shaka Khan; Dietmar Marder; Daniel Zwahlen; Stephan Bodis
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 3.621

9.  Whole brain radiation therapy followed by intensity-modulated boosting treatment combined with concomitant temozolomide for brain metastases from non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Q Wang; Z Jiang; X Qi; S Lu; S Wang; C Leng; F Lu; H Liu; S Liang; J Shi
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.405

10.  Prescription to 50-75% isodose line may be optimum for linear accelerator based radiosurgery of cranial lesions.

Authors:  Bo Zhao; Jian-Yue Jin; Ning Wen; Yimei Huang; M Salim Siddiqui; Indrin J Chetty; Samuel Ryu
Journal:  J Radiosurg SBRT       Date:  2014
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.