PURPOSE: To investigate the cost-effectiveness of a novel home-based screening system for amblyopia and amblyogenic risk factors. DESIGN: Evaluation of diagnostic test or technology. PARTICIPANTS: Two thousand four hundred forty-two preschoolers 3 to 6 years of age from 10 kindergartens randomly selected from Guangzhou participated in the study in 2009. METHODS: Preschoolers were assessed for amblyopia and amblyogenic risk factors by their parents using the home-based screening system and were re-evaluated by professionals who conducted a comprehensive eye examination. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and the cost-benefit of the home-based screening system were calculated by comparing the results from the home-assessed model and those from the professional evaluation. RESULTS: Three thousand three hundred children were invited to participate in the study, and 2308 (1216 boys and 1092 girls) completed all of the procedures. Twenty-four amblyopes were found by professional examinations. Fifteen of these amblyopes had not been diagnosed previously, and 12 of them were detected by the home-assessment model. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 80.0%, 94.1%, 8.2%, and 99.9%, respectively. Professional examinations cost an average of US $1131.00 per case of amblyopia detected, whereas the cost was only US $266.00 per case for the home-based method. For amblyogenic factors, 50, 87, and 96 children were classified into grade I, II, or III according to the professional examinations. The corresponding numbers in the home-based system were 23, 29, and 15, respectively. Accordingly, the true positive rates were 46.0%, 33.3%, and 15.6% for each grade. CONCLUSIONS: The home-based amblyopia screening system was found to be a simple, effective, and cost-beneficial method for amblyopia screening and amblyogenic risk factors. The approach offers a practical option for developing areas with large populations. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
PURPOSE: To investigate the cost-effectiveness of a novel home-based screening system for amblyopia and amblyogenic risk factors. DESIGN: Evaluation of diagnostic test or technology. PARTICIPANTS: Two thousand four hundred forty-two preschoolers 3 to 6 years of age from 10 kindergartens randomly selected from Guangzhou participated in the study in 2009. METHODS: Preschoolers were assessed for amblyopia and amblyogenic risk factors by their parents using the home-based screening system and were re-evaluated by professionals who conducted a comprehensive eye examination. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and the cost-benefit of the home-based screening system were calculated by comparing the results from the home-assessed model and those from the professional evaluation. RESULTS: Three thousand three hundred children were invited to participate in the study, and 2308 (1216 boys and 1092 girls) completed all of the procedures. Twenty-four amblyopes were found by professional examinations. Fifteen of these amblyopes had not been diagnosed previously, and 12 of them were detected by the home-assessment model. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 80.0%, 94.1%, 8.2%, and 99.9%, respectively. Professional examinations cost an average of US $1131.00 per case of amblyopia detected, whereas the cost was only US $266.00 per case for the home-based method. For amblyogenic factors, 50, 87, and 96 children were classified into grade I, II, or III according to the professional examinations. The corresponding numbers in the home-based system were 23, 29, and 15, respectively. Accordingly, the true positive rates were 46.0%, 33.3%, and 15.6% for each grade. CONCLUSIONS: The home-based amblyopia screening system was found to be a simple, effective, and cost-beneficial method for amblyopia screening and amblyogenic risk factors. The approach offers a practical option for developing areas with large populations. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Authors: Tomohiko Yamada; Sarah R Hatt; David A Leske; Pamela S Moke; Nick L Parrucci; J Jeffrey Reese; James B Ruben; Jonathan M Holmes Journal: J AAPOS Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 1.220