Literature DB >> 22364968

Noninferiority of closely monitored mechanical valves to bioprostheses overshadowed by early mortality benefit in younger patients.

Vinay Badhwar1, John C Ofenloch, Joshua D Rovin, Hugh M van Gelder, Jeffrey P Jacobs.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Confidence in bioprosthetic durability without anticoagulation has led to a contemporary trend of offering tissue valves to younger patients. Close monitoring of mechanical valve patients at lower international normalized ratio (INR) thresholds may reduce anticoagulation morbidity. We prospectively compared results of bioprostheses (BP) and a bileaflet mechanical prosthesis (MP) monitored at low INR thresholds.
METHODS: Patients received an isolated Carpentier-Edwards bovine or Medtronic porcine BP or the On-X MP. INR targets were 2.0 for MP recipients undergoing aortic valve replacement and 2.5 for mitral valve replacement, using point-of-care home monitoring. Operations consecutively performed between September 2003 and August 2007 were propensity matched using logistic regression by preoperative covariates of age, sex, valve position, New York Heart Association class, ejection fraction, atrial fibrillation, and creatinine.
RESULTS: Of 469 operations consecutively performed, 172 patients were matched for analysis. Mean age was 56.2±9.6 years (range, 24 to 72 years). Median follow-up was 4.0 years (total follow-up, 667.0 patient-years). No late bleeding events occurred. The thromboembolic complication rates per patient-year were 0.77% for MP and 0.78% for BP (p=0.67). There were 9 BP deaths vs 4 MP (2.35% vs 1.41%/patient-year; BP hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.13 to 2.15). Postoperative linearized mortality benefit of MP was observed as early as 5 years, reaching significance at 7.5 years (p=0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients aged 65 years or younger with MP and closely monitored anticoagulation display noninferiority to BP from bleeding and thromboembolic complications. MP valves begin to confer mortality benefit over BP as early as 7.5 years postoperatively. Because this predates the timeline of typical structural valve degeneration, equipoise is suggested when choosing a BP in a young patient with future expectations of valve-in-valve intervention.
Copyright © 2012 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22364968     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.12.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  7 in total

1.  Aortic biological valve prosthesis in patients younger than 65 years of age: transition to a flexible age limit?

Authors:  Lars Niclauss; Ludwig Karl von Segesser; Enrico Ferrari
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-01-03

2.  eComment. A novel lower age threshold for use of biological valves.

Authors:  Jamil Hajj-Chahine; Christophe Jayle; Paul Menu; Pierre Corbi
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-04

3.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of long-term outcomes in adults undergoing the Ross procedure.

Authors:  Campbell D Flynn; Joshua H De Bono; Benjamin Muston; Nivedita Rattan; David H Tian; Marco Larobina; Michael O'Keefe; Peter Skillington
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-07

4.  Repeat Pregnancy after Prior Aortic Valve-in-Valve Replacement: A Cautionary Tale.

Authors:  Kelly Rasmussen; Roxann Rokey; Stacey C Rolak; Chuyang Zhong; John H Braxton; Kazumasa Hashimoto
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2020-09-02

5.  Mid- to long-term outcome comparison of the Medtronic Hancock II and bi-leaflet mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age: a propensity-matched analysis.

Authors:  Yin Wang; Si Chen; Jiawei Shi; Geng Li; Nianguo Dong
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-12-15

6.  Late clinical outcomes after mechanical aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis: old versus new prostheses.

Authors:  Heemoon Lee; Kiick Sung; Wook Sung Kim; Dong Seop Jeong; Joong Hyun Ahn; Keumhee Chough Carriere; Pyo Won Park
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Durability of bioprosthetic aortic valves in patients under the age of 60 years - rationale and design of the international INDURE registry.

Authors:  Bart Meuris; Michael A Borger; Thierry Bourguignon; Matthias Siepe; Martin Grabenwöger; Günther Laufer; Konrad Binder; Gianluca Polvani; Pierluigi Stefano; Enrico Coscioni; Wouter van Leeuwen; Philippe Demers; Francois Dagenais; Sergio Canovas; Alexis Theron; Thierry Langanay; Jean-Christian Roussel; Olaf Wendler; Giovanni Mariscalco; Renzo Pessotto; Beate Botta; Peter Bramlage; Ruggero de Paulis
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 1.637

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.