Literature DB >> 22364901

Outcomes using a bioprosthetic mesh at the time of permanent stoma creation in preventing a parastomal hernia: a value analysis.

Nicole A Figel1, Jack W Rostas, C Neal Ellis.   

Abstract

PURPOSE/
METHODS: A retrospective review of the medical records of all patients who had a prosthetic placed at the time of stoma creation for the prevention of a parastomal hernia was performed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of bioprosthetics.
RESULTS: A bioprosthetic was used in 16 patients to prevent the occurrence of a parastomal hernia. The median follow-up was 38 months. There were no mesh-related complications, and no parastomal hernias occurred. On value analysis, to be cost-effective, the percentage of patients who would have subsequently needed surgical repair of a parastomal hernia would have to be in excess of 39% or the bioprosthetic would have to cost less than $2,267 to $4,312.
CONCLUSIONS: These data show the safety and efficacy of using a bioprosthetic at the time of permanent stoma creation in preventing a parastomal hernia and defines the parameters for this approach to be cost-effective.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22364901     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.10.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  8 in total

Review 1.  Ostomy-Related Complications.

Authors:  Douglas R Murken; Joshua I S Bleier
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2019-04-02

Review 2.  Technical Considerations in Stoma Creation.

Authors:  Alia Whitehead; Peter A Cataldo
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-05-22

Review 3.  European Hernia Society guidelines on prevention and treatment of parastomal hernias.

Authors:  S A Antoniou; F Agresta; J M Garcia Alamino; D Berger; F Berrevoet; H-T Brandsma; K Bury; J Conze; D Cuccurullo; U A Dietz; R H Fortelny; C Frei-Lanter; B Hansson; F Helgstrand; A Hotouras; A Jänes; L F Kroese; J R Lambrecht; I Kyle-Leinhase; M López-Cano; L Maggiori; V Mandalà; M Miserez; A Montgomery; S Morales-Conde; M Prudhomme; T Rautio; N Smart; M Śmietański; M Szczepkowski; C Stabilini; F E Muysoms
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Parastomal Hernia: Avoidance and Treatment in the 21st Century.

Authors:  Sean C Glasgow; Sekhar Dharmarajan
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2016-09

Review 5.  Stoma Complications.

Authors:  Devi Mukkai Krishnamurty; Jeffrey Blatnik; Matthew Mutch
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-05-22

Review 6.  Avoidance and management of stomal complications.

Authors:  Michael Kwiatt; Michitaka Kawata
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2013-06

Review 7.  Prophylactic mesh use during primary stoma formation to prevent parastomal hernia.

Authors:  J B Cornille; S Pathak; I R Daniels; N J Smart
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 8.  Prevention of a Parastomal Hernia by Biological Mesh Reinforcement.

Authors:  René H Fortelny; Anna Hofmann; Christopher May; Ferdinand Köckerling
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2015-10-22
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.