Literature DB >> 2236478

Clinical judgment analysis.

J R Kirwan1, D M Chaput de Saintonge, C R Joyce.   

Abstract

Judgement is central to the practice of medicine and occurs between making clinical observations and taking clinical decisions. Clinical judgment analysis has developed as a method of making statistically firm models of doctors' judgments. Computed models reveal the differential importance attached to items of clinical, social, or other data which are determinants of clinical decisions. These models can both reveal the causes of conflicts of judgment and may help resolve them in a way that unaided discussion cannot. Revealing experts' models to students speeds learning of diagnostic skills. Clinical judgment analysis offers a method of probing the judgments not just of students and doctors but also of patients who have shown systematic differences in their perceptions of risk and benefit. The power and relevance of clinical trials can be improved by the consistent application of judgment policies generated from both the trialists and those who will use their results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2236478

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Med        ISSN: 0033-5622


  13 in total

1.  Comparative impact of guidelines, clinical data, and decision support on prescribing decisions: an interactive web experiment with simulated cases.

Authors:  Vitali Sintchenko; Enrico Coiera; Jonathan R Iredell; Gwendolyn L Gilbert
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-10-05       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Impact of feedback and peer review on prescribing.

Authors:  F M Haaijer-Ruskamp; P Denig
Journal:  Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1995-02

3.  How Nova Scotia general practitioners choose antibiotics for the empirical treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  J Pendergrast; T J Marrie
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  2000-11

Review 4.  Does good science make good medicine? Incorporating evidence into practice is complicated by the fact that clinical practice is as much art as science.

Authors:  N P Kenny
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-07-01       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Development of a direct weighting procedure for quality of life domains.

Authors:  J P Browne; C A O'Boyle; H M McGee; N J McDonald; C R Joyce
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Health services research.

Authors:  D M Chaput de Saintonge; R M Poses
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-03-20

7.  Decision making in asthma exacerbation: a clinical judgement analysis.

Authors:  John Jenkins; Mike Shields; Chris Patterson; Frank Kee
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2007-04-11       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  Physicians' tacit and stated policies for determining patient benefit and referral to cardiac rehabilitation.

Authors:  Jason W Beckstead; Mark V Pezzo; Theresa M Beckie; Farnaz Shahraki; Amanda C Kentner; Sherry L Grace
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Adoption of and adherence to the Hellenic Diabetes Association guidelines for the management of subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus by Greek physicians.

Authors:  Nikolaos G Bimpas; Vivian Auyeung; Anastasios Tentolouris; Evangelia Tzeravini; Ioanna Eleftheriadou; Nikolaos Tentolouris
Journal:  Hormones (Athens)       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 2.885

10.  Does smoking status affect the likelihood of consulting a doctor about respiratory symptoms? A pilot survey in Western Australia.

Authors:  Moyez Jiwa; Hayley Arnet; Georgia Halkett; Marthe Smith; Moira O'Connor; Julia Rhodes; Kate Poland; Max Bulsara
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 2.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.