Literature DB >> 22364682

Comparison of dental esthetic perceptions of young adolescents and their parents.

Golnaz Kavand1, Barbara Broffitt, Steven M Levy, John J Warren.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare dental esthetic perceptions of adolescents at age 13 with those of parents and to assess associations with dental fluorosis.
METHODS: Adolescents aged 13 underwent dental examinations for fluorosis on maxillary anterior teeth using the Fluorosis Risk Index. Adolescents and parents completed questionnaires concerning satisfaction with adolescents' dental appearance. McNemar and Bowker tests of symmetry were used for comparisons of esthetics ratings between parents and adolescents. Comparison of satisfaction between subjects with fluorosis and subjects with no fluorosis was made using Cochran-Armitage Trend and Fisher's Exact tests.
RESULTS: From 376 adolescents included in the study, 26 percent had definitive fluorosis, mostly at a mild level. Fifteen percent of adolescents were dissatisfied with dental appearance, and concerns were mainly about color (45 percent) and alignment (35 percent). Adolescents were less satisfied with overall dental appearance (P < 0.001) and color (P = 0.048) and more concerned about tooth shape (P = 0.002) than were their parents. Fluorosis status (yes/no) was not significantly associated with adolescents' perceptions (P > 0.05). Parents of subjects with fluorosis were more dissatisfied with dental appearance (P = 0.014) and color (P < 0.001) than other parents. The number of maxillary anterior zones exhibiting fluorosis was negatively associated with adolescent (P = 0.03) and parent (P = 0.002) satisfaction.
CONCLUSION: Adolescents generally had less satisfaction with dental appearance and color, and were more concerned with tooth shape than were parents. For both parents and adolescents, decreased satisfaction was associated with the number of zones with definitive fluorosis.
© 2012 American Association of Public Health Dentistry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22364682      PMCID: PMC3370263          DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2011.00306.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health Dent        ISSN: 0022-4006            Impact factor:   1.821


  27 in total

1.  Development of a questionnaire to measure perceptions of, and concerns derived from, dental fluorosis.

Authors:  E Angeles Martínez-Mier; Gerardo Maupomé; Armando E Soto-Rojas; José L Ureña-Cirett; Barry P Katz; George K Stookey
Journal:  Community Dent Health       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.349

2.  A pilot study of esthetic perceptions of dental fluorosis vs. selected other dental conditions.

Authors:  C B McKnight; S M Levy; S E Cooper; J R Jakobsen
Journal:  ASDC J Dent Child       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug

3.  An assessment of teenagers' perceptions of dental fluorosis using digital simulation and web-based testing.

Authors:  Maura Edwards; Lorna M D Macpherson; David R Simmons; W Harper Gilmour; Kenneth W Stephen
Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.383

4.  Clinical appearance of dental fluorosis in permanent teeth in relation to histologic changes.

Authors:  A Thylstrup; O Fejerskov
Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 3.383

5.  Evaluation of subjective oral health status indicators.

Authors:  D Locker; Y Miller
Journal:  J Public Health Dent       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.821

6.  The influence of various fluoride exposures on the prevalence of esthetic problems resulting from dental fluorosis.

Authors:  D C Clark; J Berkowitz
Journal:  J Public Health Dent       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.821

7.  Effects of perceived attractiveness and academic success on early adolescent peer popularity.

Authors:  C J Boyatzis; P Baloff; C Durieux
Journal:  J Genet Psychol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.509

8.  Aesthetic concerns of children and parents in relation to different classifications of the Tooth Surface Index of Fluorosis.

Authors:  D C Clark; H J Hann; M F Williamson; J Berkowitz
Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.383

9.  A new method for assessing the prevalence of dental fluorosis--the Tooth Surface Index of Fluorosis.

Authors:  H S Horowitz; W S Driscoll; R J Meyers; S B Heifetz; A Kingman
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 3.634

10.  Evaluation of aesthetics for the different classifications of the Tooth Surface Index of Fluorosis.

Authors:  D C Clark
Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.383

View more
  5 in total

1.  Influence of Gender on the Patient's Assessment of Restorations on the Upper Anterior Teeth.

Authors:  Ela Kristek Zorić; Maja Žagar; Dubravka Knezović Zlatarić
Journal:  Acta Stomatol Croat       Date:  2014-03

2.  Self-Perception of Teeth Alignment and Colour in Adolescents: A Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Larissa Viana de Oliveira; Paulo Roberto Grafitti Colussi; Carla Cioato Piardi; Cassiano Kuchenbecker Rösing; Francisco Wilker Mustafa Gomes Muniz
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 2.607

3.  Perception of orofacial appearance among laypersons with diverse social and demographic status.

Authors:  Mohammed Nasser Alhajj; Zaihan Ariffin; Asja Celebić; Abdulaziz A Alkheraif; Abdullah G Amran; Ibrahim A Ismail
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Dental esthetic and the likelihood of finding a job in Saudi Arabia. A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Raghad Almedlej; Reem Aldosary; Rana Barakah; Abeer Alkhalifah; Abdallah Adlan; Abdulrahman D AlSaffan; Mohammad A Baseer
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2020-01-28

5.  Factors Involved in the Perception of Enamel Dyschromic Lesions-A Questionnaire-Based Study.

Authors:  Cristina Gasparik; Horațiu Alexandru Colosi; Bianca Elena Varvara; Alexandru Grațian Grecu; Alexandra Iulia Aghiorghiesei; Anca Ștefania Mesaroș; Amalia Mazilu Moldovan; Diana Dudea
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.