PURPOSE: In light of the increased incidence of contact lens associated Acanthamoeba keratitis in recent years, this study analyzed longitudinal trends of its incidence among predominantly non-contact lens wearers in a high-volume referral center in South India. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of microbiology laboratory records at the Aravind Eye Hospital from 1988-2009 was performed. The Maximum Excess Events Test (MEET) was used to identify epidemics of Acanthamoeba keratitis. RESULTS: There were a total of 38,529 unique cases of infectious keratitis evaluated over this time period, of which 372 were culture-positive for Acanthamoeba. Only three cases (0.9%) of Acanthamoeba keratitis occurred among contact lens wearers. MEET identified unique Acanthamoeba keratitis epidemics in 1993 and 2002. CONCLUSION: Discrete epidemics of Acanthamoeba keratitis occurred among a rural, non-contact lens wearing, population in South India in 1993 and 2002.
PURPOSE: In light of the increased incidence of contact lens associated Acanthamoeba keratitis in recent years, this study analyzed longitudinal trends of its incidence among predominantly non-contact lens wearers in a high-volume referral center in South India. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of microbiology laboratory records at the Aravind Eye Hospital from 1988-2009 was performed. The Maximum Excess Events Test (MEET) was used to identify epidemics of Acanthamoeba keratitis. RESULTS: There were a total of 38,529 unique cases of infectious keratitis evaluated over this time period, of which 372 were culture-positive for Acanthamoeba. Only three cases (0.9%) of Acanthamoeba keratitis occurred among contact lens wearers. MEET identified unique Acanthamoeba keratitis epidemics in 1993 and 2002. CONCLUSION: Discrete epidemics of Acanthamoeba keratitis occurred among a rural, non-contact lens wearing, population in South India in 1993 and 2002.
Authors: M Srinivasan; C A Gonzales; C George; V Cevallos; J M Mascarenhas; B Asokan; J Wilkins; G Smolin; J P Whitcher Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 1997-11 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Simon Kilvington; Trevor Gray; John Dart; Nigel Morlet; John R Beeching; David G Frazer; Melville Matheson Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Jeena Mascarenhas; Prajna Lalitha; N Venkatesh Prajna; Muthiah Srinivasan; Manoranjan Das; Sean S D'Silva; Catherine E Oldenburg; Durga S Borkar; Elizabeth J Esterberg; Thomas M Lietman; Jeremy D Keenan Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2013-11-05 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Elena Pacella; Giuseppe La Torre; Maria De Giusti; Chiara Brillante; Anna Maria Lombardi; Gianpaolo Smaldone; Tommaso Lenzi; Fernanda Pacella Journal: Clin Ophthalmol Date: 2013-05-28