Literature DB >> 2236442

P300, probability, and interstimulus interval.

J Polich1.   

Abstract

The relationship between target stimulus probability and interstimulus interval on the P300 (P3) component of the event-related potential was assessed in three experiments. In each study an auditory discrimination paradigm was employed wherein subjects indicated with a finger tap response the occurrence of a randomly presented 2000 Hz target tone embedded in a series of 1,000 Hz tones. Target stimuli were presented with a probability of either .20 or .80 in different conditions which were combined factorially with different interstimulus intervals. Experiment 1 presented stimuli at 2.0, 2.5, or 3.0 second intervals; Experiment 2 presented stimuli at 2.0, 3.0, or 4.0 second intervals; Experiment 3 presented stimuli at 4.0, 6.0, or 10.0 second intervals. P3 amplitude was larger for the .20 relative to the .80 target probability conditions for the shorter interstimulus intervals but not for the longer intervals. P3 latency was consistently longer for the .20 relative to the .80 target probability conditions, with generally little effect observed for interstimulus interval changes. The results suggest that interstimulus interval affects component amplitude by determining the amount of processing resources available when the P3 is produced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2236442     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1990.tb02333.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  14 in total

1.  Olfactory ERPs in an odor/visual congruency task differentiate ApoE ε4 carriers from non-carriers.

Authors:  Joel Kowalewski; Claire Murphy
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 2.  Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b.

Authors:  John Polich
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  P300 as a measure of cognitive dysfunction from occupational and environmental insults.

Authors:  J B Pan; T Takeshita; K Morimoto
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.674

4.  Attentional Bias to Drug- and Stress-Related Pictorial Cues in Cocaine Addiction Comorbid with PTSD.

Authors:  Estate Sokhadze; Shraddha Singh; Christopher Stewart; Michael Hollifield; Ayman El-Baz; Allan Tasman
Journal:  J Neurother       Date:  2008-12-01

5.  Abnormal distracter processing in adults with attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Frank Marzinzik; Michael Wahl; Doris Krüger; Laura Gentschow; Michael Colla; Fabian Klostermann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  EEG biofeedback as a treatment for substance use disorders: review, rating of efficacy, and recommendations for further research.

Authors:  Tato M Sokhadze; Rex L Cannon; David L Trudeau
Journal:  Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback       Date:  2008-01-24

7.  Individuals at risk for Alzheimer's disease show differential patterns of ERP brain activation during odor identification.

Authors:  Charlie D Morgan; Claire Murphy
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.759

8.  Sequential Processing and the Matching-Stimulus Interval Effect in ERP Components: An Exploration of the Mechanism Using Multiple Regression.

Authors:  Genevieve Z Steiner; Robert J Barry; Craig J Gonsalvez
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Do Rare Stimuli Evoke Large P3s by Being Unexpected? A Comparison of Oddball Effects Between Standard-Oddball and Prediction-Oddball Tasks.

Authors:  Rolf Verleger; Kamila Śmigasiewicz
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2016-06-30

10.  Cognitive tasks during expectation affect the congruency ERP effects to facial expressions.

Authors:  Huiyan Lin; Claudia Schulz; Thomas Straube
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.