| Literature DB >> 22363729 |
Diego C N Silva1, Cauêh N Jovino, Carlos A L Silva, Heloise P Fernandes, Milton M Filho, Sheyla C Lucena, Ana Maria D N Costa, Carlos L Cesar, Maria L Barjas-Castro, Beate S Santos, Adriana Fontes.
Abstract
During storage, red blood cells (RBCs) for transfusion purposes suffer progressive deterioration. Sialylated glycoproteins of the RBC membrane are responsible for a negatively charged surface which creates a repulsive electrical zeta potential. These charges help prevent the interaction between RBCs and other cells, and especially among each RBCs. Reports in the literature have stated that RBCs sialylated glycoproteins can be sensitive to enzymes released by leukocyte degranulation. Thus, the aim of this study was, by using an optical tweezers as a biomedical tool, to measure the zeta potential in standard RBCs units and in leukocyte reduced RBC units (collected in CPD-SAGM) during storage. Optical tweezers is a sensitive tool that uses light for measuring cell biophysical properties which are important for clinical and research purposes. This is the first study to analyze RBCs membrane charges during storage. In addition, we herein also measured the elasticity of RBCs also collected in CPD-SAGM. In conclusion, the zeta potential decreased 42% and cells were 134% less deformable at the end of storage. The zeta potential from leukodepleted units had a similar profile when compared to units stored without leukoreduction, indicating that leukocyte lyses were not responsible for the zeta potential decay. Flow cytometry measurements of reactive oxygen species suggested that this decay is due to membrane oxidative damages. These results show that measurements of zeta potentials provide new insights about RBCs storage lesion for transfusion purposes.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22363729 PMCID: PMC3283675 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031778
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Illustration of the chamber used for zeta potential measurements.
Figure 2Migration of RBCs.
(a) without any voltage (at rest); (b) moving in terminal velocity according to the applied voltage.
Figure 3Plots of velocity against voltage as examples used to obtain the zeta potential.
The higher the slope, the higher is the zeta potential. The correlation coefficients were better than 0.98. The barriers represent standard errors.
Temporal evaluation of the zeta potential (for non leukodepleted RBCs samples) during the storage period.
| Storage Time (Days) | Average Zeta Potential (mV) |
| Day 1 | −(14.5±0.7) |
| Day 8 | −(9.7±0.3) |
| Day 15 | −(10.3±0.3) |
| Day 22 | −(10.2±0.4) |
| Day 29 to Day 36 | −(8.5±0.4) |
*The average zeta potential from day 8 to day 22≅−(10.1±0.3) mV.
Temporal evaluation of the zeta potential (for leukodepleted RBCs samples) during the storage period.
| Storage Time (Days) | Average Zeta Potential (mV) |
| Day 1 | −(14.0±0.5) |
| Day 8 | −(9.5±0.6) |
| Day 15 | −(10.0±0.4) |
Figure 4Difference between RBCs elongations according to the applied velocity in the day 8 and day 36 of storage.
Figure 5Temporal evaluation of the apparent RBC elasticity during the storage period.
The barriers represent standard errors.