| Literature DB >> 22363601 |
Dan Takeuchi1, Anusak Kerdsin, Anupong Pienpringam, Phacharaphan Loetthong, Sutit Samerchea, Pakkinee Luangsuk, Kasean Khamisara, Nithita Wongwan, Prasanee Areeratana, Piphat Chiranairadul, Suwat Lertchayanti, Sininat Petcharat, Amara Yowang, Phanupong Chaiwongsaen, Tatsuya Nakayama, Yukihiro Akeda, Shigeyuki Hamada, Pathom Sawanpanyalert, Surang Dejsirilert, Kazunori Oishi.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Streptococcus suis infection in humans has received increasing worldwide recognition. METHODS ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22363601 PMCID: PMC3283636 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031265
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Location of the study site and distribution of human isolates.
(A) Location of Phayao Province in northern Thailand. (B) Distribution and sequence typing of 31 human isolates of Streptococcus suis in Phayao Province in 2010 (B). One symbol is one case. Closed symbols denote fatal cases, and open symbols denote nonfatal cases.
Figure 2Monthly distribution of human cases of Streptococcus suis infection in each district in Phayao Province in 2010.
Clinical characteristics of 31 human cases of Streptococcus suis infection in Phayao Province, 2010.
| Characteristics | All reported cases | Nonfatal case, n = 26; 83.9% | Fatal case, n = 5; 16.1% |
|
| Demographic | ||||
| Male, no. of cases (%), n = 31 | 20 (64.5) | 18 (69.2) | 2 (40) | 0.317 |
| Age, median (range), n = 31 | 53 (26–74) | 52 (26–74) | 64 (36–72) | 0.115 |
| Risk behavior, no. of cases (%) | ||||
| Recent consumption of raw pork products, n = 31 | 22 (71.0) | 20 (76.9) | 2 (40) | 0.131 |
| Recent contact with pigs or raw pork products, n = 31 | 2 (6.5) | 2 (7.7) | 0 (0) | 1 |
| Days from the consumption of raw pork products to the onset of illness median (range), n = 22 | 2 (0–11) | 2 (0–11) | 1.5 (1–2) | 0.623 |
| Days from the onset of illness to the admission median (range), n = 31 | 2 (0–14) | 2 (0–7) | 4 (0–14) | 0.176 |
*n = 20,
**n = 2.
Clinical, epidemiological and microbiological features of 31 human cases of Streptococcus suis infection in Phayao Province, 2010.
| No. | Age | Sex | District | Contact with pigs or raw pork products | Consumption of raw pork products | Day of onset | Outcome | Serotype | Pulsotype | MLST | Possible cluster | ||||
| Consumption | Date | Place | Type of product | ST complex | ST | ||||||||||
| 1 | 41 | M | Muang Phayao | No | Yes | 2 Apr | Home | Loo | 5 Apr | Alive | 2 | A3 | 1 | 1 | PC I |
| 2 | 46 | M | Muang Phayao | No | Yes | 15 Apr | Restaurant A | Loo | 17 Apr | Alive | 2 | A | 1 | 1 | PC I |
| 3 | 72 | M | Muang Phayao | No | Yes | 20 Apr | Restaurant B | Loo | 22 Apr | Dead | 2 | A | 1 | 1 | PC I |
| 4 | 63 | F | Muang Phayao | No | No | - | 28 Apr | Dead | 14 | J | 1 | 105 | |||
| 5 | 51 | M | Muang Phayao | No | No | - | 15 May | Alive | 14 | J | 1 | 105 | |||
| 6 | 52 | M | Dok Khamtai | No | No | - | 24 Apr | Alive | 14 | J | 1 | 105 | |||
| 7 | 50 | M | Chiang Kham | No | Yes | 30 Apr | Home | Boiled intestine | 1 May | Alive | 14 | J | 1 | 105 | PC II |
| 8 | 56 | M | Chiang Kham | No | Yes | 8 May | Restaurant C | Loo | 10 May | Alive | 2 | A | 1 | 1 | PC II |
| 9 | 65 | M | Chiang Kham | No | Yes | 12 May | Restaurant C | Loo | 13 May | Alive | 2 | A2** | 1 | 1 | PC II |
| 10 | 49 | M | Chiang Kham | No | Yes | 12 May | Restaurant C | Loo | 16 May | Alive | 2 | A2** | 1 | 1 | PC II |
| 11 | 26 | F | Chiang Kham | No | Yes | 15 May | Restaurant C | Loo | 17 May | Alive | 2 | A2** | 1 | 1 | PC II |
| 12 | 53 | M | Chiang Kham | No | Yes | 12 May | Home | Lap | 14 May | Alive | 2 | A2 | 1 | 1 | PC II |
| 13 | 59 | M | Chun | No | Yes | 6 May | Home | Lap | 7 May | Alive | 2 | A2 | 1 | 1 | PC II |
| 14 | 57 | M | Chun | No | Yes | 12 May | Home | Fermented raw pork | 14 May | Alive | 14 | J | 1 | 105 | PC II |
| 15 | 54 | M | Chun | No | Yes | 10 May | Home | Fermented raw pork | 14 May | Alive | 14 | J | 1 | 105 | PC II |
| 16 | 45 | F | Pong | No | Yes | 3 May | Home | Fermented raw pork | 10 May | Alive | 14 | J | 1 | 105 | PC II |
| 17 | 72 | F | Dok Khamtai | No | No | - | 10 Jun | Alive | 2 | A1 | 1 | 1 | |||
| 18 | 42 | F | Dok Khamtai | No | Yes | 26 May | Home | Loo | 28 May | Alive | 2 | A1 | 1 | 1 | PC III |
| 19 | 41 | M | Dok Khamtai | No | Yes | 1 Jun | Restaurant D | Loo | 3 Jun | Alive | 2 | A1 | 1 | 1 | PC III |
| 20 | 50 | M | Chun | No | Yes | 1 Jun | Home | Loo | 12 Jun | Alive | 2 | A2 | 1 | 1 | PC III |
| 21 | 60 | F | Chun | Yes | No | - | 19 Jun | Alive | 2 | A2 | 1 | 1 | PC III | ||
| 22 | 52 | F | Muang Phayao | No | No | - | 15 Jun | Alive | 14 | J | 1 | 105 | |||
| 23 | 74 | F | Mae Chai | No | No | - | 20 Jun | Alive | 2 | H | 225 | 104 | |||
| 24 | 69 | F | Mae Chai | No | No | 20 Jul | Dead | 2 | A | 1 | 1 | ||||
| 25 | 66 | M | Dok Khamtai | No | Yes | 2 Jul | Home | Loo | 4 Jul | Alive | 2 | A5 | 1 | 1 | |
| 26 | 55 | M | Chun | No | Yes | 30 Jul | Home | Lap | 1 Aug | Alive | 2 | A2 | 1 | 1 | |
| 27 | 34 | M | Chiang Kham | Yes | Yes | 30 Aug | Home | Loo | 1 Sep | Alive | 2 | H | 225 | 104 | |
| 28 | 36 | M | Dok Khamtai | No | Yes | 11 Sep | Home | Loo | 12 Sep | Dead | 2 | K | 29 | 103 | |
| 29 | 47 | F | Pong | No | Yes | 20 Oct | Restaurant E | Loo | 21 Oct | Alive | 2 | A | 1 | 1 | |
| 30 | 64 | F | Muang Phayao | No | No | - | 23 Nov | Dead | 2 | A1 | 1 | 1 | |||
| 31 | 59 | M | Pong | No | Yes | 5 Dec | Home | Lap | 6 Dec | Alive | 2 | A2 | 1 | 1 | |
Three possible clusters in the district of Muang Phayao (PC I), the districts of Chiang Kham, Chun and Pong (PC II), and the districts of Dok Khantai and Chun (PC III) are shown.
*The pulsotype was designated as previously described [4]. A2**, Serotype 2 with pulsotype A2 was the causative pathogen of a cluster of three cases. MLST, multilocus sequence type; ST, sequence typing.