Literature DB >> 22363543

Two novel mutations in the EYS gene are possible major causes of autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa in the Japanese population.

Katsuhiro Hosono1, Chie Ishigami, Masayo Takahashi, Dong Ho Park, Yasuhiko Hirami, Hiroshi Nakanishi, Shinji Ueno, Tadashi Yokoi, Akiko Hikoya, Taichi Fujita, Yang Zhao, Sachiko Nishina, Jae Pil Shin, In Taek Kim, Shuichi Yamamoto, Noriyuki Azuma, Hiroko Terasaki, Miho Sato, Mineo Kondo, Shinsei Minoshima, Yoshihiro Hotta.   

Abstract

Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) is a highly heterogeneous genetic disease including autosomal recessive (ar), autosomal dominant (ad), and X-linked inheritance. Recently, arRP has been associated with mutations in EYS (Eyes shut homolog), which is a major causative gene for this disease. This study was conducted to determine the spectrum and frequency of EYS mutations in 100 Japanese arRP patients. To determine the prevalence of EYS mutations, all EYS exons were screened for mutations by polymerase chain reaction amplification, and sequence analysis was performed. We detected 67 sequence alterations in EYS, of which 21 were novel. Of these, 7 were very likely pathogenic mutations, 6 were possible pathogenic mutations, and 54 were predicted non-pathogenic sequence alterations. The minimum observed prevalence of distinct EYS mutations in our study was 18% (18/100, comprising 9 patients with 2 very likely pathogenic mutations and the remaining 9 with only one such mutation). Among these mutations, 2 novel truncating mutations, c.4957_4958insA (p.S1653KfsX2) and c.8868C>A (p.Y2956X), were identified in 16 patients and accounted for 57.1% (20/35 alleles) of the mutated alleles. Although these 2 truncating mutations were not detected in Japanese patients with adRP or Leber's congenital amaurosis, we detected them in Korean arRP patients. Similar to Japanese arRP results, the c.4957_4958insA mutation was more frequently detected than the c.8868C>A mutation. The 18% estimated prevalence of very likely pathogenic mutations in our study suggests a major involvement of EYS in the pathogenesis of arRP in the Japanese population. Mutation spectrum of EYS in 100 Japanese patients, including 13 distinct very likely and possible pathogenic mutations, was largely different from the previously reported spectrum in patients from non-Asian populations. Screening for c.4957_4958insA and c.8868C>A mutations in the EYS gene may therefore be very effective for the genetic testing and counseling of RP patients in Japan.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22363543      PMCID: PMC3281914          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Retinitis pigmentosa (RP [MIM 268000]) is a highly heterogeneous genetic disease characterized by night blindness and visual field constriction leading to severe visual impairment. The disease appears with different modes of inheritance including autosomal recessive (ar), autosomal dominant (ad), and X-linked, and currently over half of cases are isolated in Japan. To date, 53 causative genes and 7 loci of RP have been identified (http://www.sph.uth.tmc.edu/Retnet/), including the eyes shut homolog (EYS) gene encoding an ortholog of Drosophila spacemaker (spam), a protein essential for photoreceptor morphology. EYS spans over 2 Mb, making it one of the largest known genes expressed in the human eye [1], [2]. EYS gene mutations, primarily truncating and some missense mutations, have been detected in arRP families of different ancestral origin and have reported to account for 5–16% of arRP [3]–[6]. Most gene mutations (e.g., RHO, PRPH2, PRPF31, RP1, and IMPDH1) have been found in Japanese patients with adRP, with few reports describing mutations in arRP [7], [8]. Therefore, the genes causing arRP in most Japanese families have yet to be identified. In this study, we screened all EYS gene exons in 100 unrelated Japanese RP patients. We found 2 novel truncating EYS gene mutations that were surprisingly related to 16% of Japanese arRP patients, but were not detected in Japanese patients with either adRP or Leber's congenital amaurosis (LCA [MIM204000], the earliest onset and most severe form of hereditary retinal dystrophy with several clinical features overlapping with those of RP). Additionally, these mutations were also detected in 9% of Korean arRP patients.

Methods

Patients and clinical evaluation

We screened all EYS gene exons in 100 unrelated Japanese RP patients with no systemic manifestations, excluding families with obvious autosomal dominant inheritance. Some pedigrees showed a pattern compatible with the recessive mode of inheritance; the other patients were considered isolated cases. In addition, 200 unrelated and non-RP Japanese individuals were screened as controls to evaluate the frequency of the mutations found in the patient samples. We also screened a part of EYS gene exons 26 and 44 in 19 unrelated Japanese adRP patients, 28 unrelated Japanese LCA patients, and 32 unrelated Korean arRP patients. The 19 Japanese adRP patients had already been screened for some principal adRP-causing genes, but the pathogenic mutations have not yet been detected. Examples of the screening list for adRP-causing genes and targeted exons include exon 3 and 4 in RP1; exon 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 in RHO; exon 1, 2, and 3 in PRPH2; exon 2, 3, and 4 in CRX; exon 11 in PRPF3; exon 10, 11, and 12 in IMPDH1; exon 2 in NRL; exon 43 in PRPF8; exon 1 and 2 in ROM1; exon 5 and 6 in RP9; exon 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, and 12 in PRPF31; exon 11 and 15 in SEMA4A; exon 1 in CA4; exon 3 in GUCA1B; exon 3 in SP4; and exon 3 in TOPORS. Japanese RP patients were examined either at the Department of Ophthalmology, Hamamatsu University Hospital in Hamamatsu (by YH), Department of Ophthalmology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital in Kobe (by MT), or Department of Ophthalmology, Nagoya University Hospital in Nagoya (by MK). Patients' origin varied widely, from the Tokyo to Osaka areas in Japan. Japanese LCA patients were examined at the Department of Ophthalmology and Laboratory of Cell Biology, National Center for Child Health and Development in Tokyo (by NA). LCA patients' origin varied widely, from all over Japan except the Okinawa islands. Meanwhile, Korean RP patients were examined at the Department of Ophthalmology, Kyungpook National University Hospital in Daegu (by ITK). The Korean patients' origin varied widely, from Daegu to Yeongju and Pohang areas in Gyeongsangbuk-do, Korea. A full ophthalmic examination was performed. Clinical diagnosis for RP was based on visual field, fundus examination, and electroretinogram findings, and clinical diagnosis for LCA was based on fundus examination and electroretinogram findings.

Ethics statements

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board for Human Genetic and Genome Research at the 6 participating institutions (Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, RIKEN Center for Developmental Biology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, National Center for Child Health and Development, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, and Kyungpook National University Hospital), and its procedures conformed to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants before molecular genetic studies.

Mutation analysis

Genomic DNA in Japanese samples was extracted from the peripheral lymphocytes using standard procedures. In Korean samples, whole blood samples were collected on FTA cards (GE Healthcare). Blood samples were spotted onto the cards and air-dried for 1 h at room temperature. For polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification, a 1.2-mm disk was punched from a dried blood spot using a Harris micro-punch tool (GE Healthcare) and processed according to the manufacturer's instructions. PCR was performed using the KOD -Plus- ver. 2 PCR kit (Toyobo) with the primer sets described in Table S1 for 35 cycles of 98°C for 10 s, 60°C for 30 s, and 68°C for 1 min in an automated thermal cycler (GeneAmp PCR System 9700; Applied Biosystems). PCR products were purified with Wizard SV Gel and PCR Clean-up System (Promega) or treated with Exonuclease I and Antarctic Phosphatase (New England Biolabs). Direct sequencing was performed using the BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit on an ABI3100 autosequencer (Applied Biosystems). For Japanese arRP patients, all 44 exons, including 3 non-coding exons (exons 1–3) that cover the 5′ untranslated region and 41 coding exons (exons 4–44), were analyzed in both sense and antisense directions. For Japanese adRP and LCA patients, and Korean arRP patients, parts of exons 26 and 44 were analyzed (Table S1).

Assessment of pathogenicity

A sequence variant was considered pathogenic if it represented a truncating mutation (nonsense or frameshift), large-scale deletion mutation, or missense mutation affecting a conserved amino acid residue and did not appear in control samples (number of alleles studied ≤400) and/or in a public SNP database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/SNP/). Particularly, missense mutations were considered pathogenic if found together with a second variant, especially if it was truncating. As reference data, we employed 4 computational algorithms to evaluate the pathogenicity of missense mutations: SIFT (http://sift.jcvi.org/www/SIFT_seq_submit2.html), PolyPhen2 (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2/), PMut (http://mmb.pcb.ub.es/PMut/), and SNAP (http://rostlab.org/services/snap/).

Results

Mutation analysis of EYS in 100 unrelated Japanese patients revealed 7 very likely pathogenic mutations in 18 patients (18%). Of these 18 patients, a second mutant allele could not be detected in 9 patients. The very likely pathogenic mutations consisted of 3 truncating mutations, 1 deletion mutation, 2 missense mutations, and 1 previously described mutation (Fig. 1, Table 1, and Table 2). In addition, we also identified 6 possible pathogenic mutations in 8 separate patients (Table 1 and Table 2).
Figure 1

Electropherograms of the 6 likely pathogenic EYS mutations.

Partial sequence of the EYS gene showing the normal control sequences (A-1 through F-1), heterozygous mutation sequences (A-2 through F-2), and homozygous mutation sequences (A-3 and C-3). Deduced amino acids are indicated under the sequence trace. The mutation location is indicated either by an arrow (for a nucleotide change) or a horizontal line (to show 2 nucleotides between which the insertion occurred). (A) c.4957_4958insA; p.S1653KfsX2 (Exon 26), (B) c.6557G>A; p.G2186E (Exon 32), (C) c.8868C>A; p.Y2956X (Exon 44), (D) c.8351T>G; p.L2784R (Exon 44), (E) c.7793G>A; p.G2598D (Exon 40), (F) c.2522_2523insA; p.Y841X (Exon 16).

Table 1

Mutation spectrum of the EYS gene in Japanese families.

Family IDNucleotide changePredicted effectDomaina Location in geneType of changeReference
Families with very likely pathogenic mutations and both alleles affected
RP3Hb c.4957_4958insA/c.4957_4958insAp.S1653KfsX2/p.S1653KfsX2Close to coiled-coil/Close to coiled-coilExon 26/Exon 26HomozygousThis study
RP48Kb c.4957_4958insA/c.4957_4958insAp.S1653KfsX2/p.S1653KfsX2Close to coiled-coil/Close to coiled-coilExon 26/Exon 26HomozygousThis study
RP54Kc.4957_4958insA/c.4957_4958insAp.S1653KfsX2/p.S1653KfsX2Close to coiled-coil/Close to coiled-coilExon 26/Exon 26HomozygousThis study
RP44Kc.4957_4958insA/c.6557G>Ap.S1653KfsX2/p.G2186EClose to coiled-coil/Laminin GExon 26/Exon 32Heterozygous/HeterozygousThis study/Abd El-Aziz et al., 2010; Littink et al., 2010; This study
RP56Kb c.4957_4958insA/c.8351T>Gp.S1653KfsX2/p.L2784RClose to coiled-coil/Laminin GExon 26/Exon 44Compound HeterozygousThis study
RP87Nc.4957_4958insA/c.7793G>Ap.S1653KfsX2/p.G2598DClose to coiled-coil/Close to Laminin GExon 26/Exon 40Heterozygous/HeterozygousThis study
RP81Kb c.2522_2523insA/c.6557G>Ap.Y841X/p.G2186EEGF/Laminin GExon 16/Exon 32Compound HeterozygousThis study/Abd El-Aziz et al., 2010; Littink et al., 2010; This study
RP21Hdeletion exon32/deletion exon32p.D2142_S2191delinsG/p.D2142_S2191delinsGLaminin G/Laminin GExon 32/Exon 32HomozygousThis study
RP35Kc.8868C>A/c.8868C>Ap.Y2956X/p.Y2956XEGF/EGFExon 44/Exon 44HomozygousThis study
Families with single very likely pathogenic mutations
RP1Hc.4957_4958insAp.S1653KfsX2Close to coiled-coilExon 26HeterozygousThis study
RP6Hc.4957_4958insAp.S1653KfsX2Close to coiled-coilExon 26HeterozygousThis study
RP12Hc.4957_4958insAp.S1653KfsX2Close to coiled-coilExon 26HeterozygousThis study
RP51Kc.4957_4958insAp.S1653KfsX2Close to coiled-coilExon 26HeterozygousThis study
RP96Hc.4957_4958insAp.S1653KfsX2Close to coiled-coilExon 26HeterozygousThis study
RP100Nc.4957_4958insAp.S1653KfsX2Close to coiled-coilExon 26HeterozygousThis study
RP8Hc.8868C>Ap.Y2956XEGFExon 44HeterozygousThis study
RP25Hc.8868C>Ap.Y2956XEGFExon 44HeterozygousThis study
RP80Kb c.8868C>Ap.Y2956XEGFExon 44HeterozygousThis study
Families with single possible pathogenic mutations
RP4Hc.9272T>Cp.I3091TLaminin GExon 44HeterozygousThis study
RP9Hc.8875C>Ap.L2959MEGFExon 44HeterozygousThis study
RP49Kc.9272T>Cp.I3091TLaminin GExon 44HeterozygousThis study
RP53Kc.5884A>Gp.T1962ALaminin GExon 28HeterozygousThis study
RP55Kc.9272T>Cp.I3091TLaminin GExon 44HeterozygousThis study
RP74Kc.5404C>Tp.L1802FClose to Laminin GExon 26HeterozygousThis study
RP79Kc.77G>Ap.R26QClose to signal peptide cleavage siteExon 4HeterozygousThis study
RP83Kc.2923T>Cp.C975REGFExon 19HeterozygousThis study

Nucleotide numbering reflects cDNA numbering with +1 corresponding to the A of the ATG translation initiation codon in the reference sequence FM209056, according to the nomenclature recommended by the Human Genome Variation Society (www.hgvs.org/mutnomen). The initiation codon is codon 1. None of these 13 mutations were found in the Japanese controls.

EYS has a signal peptide, a putative coiled-coil, 29 EGF, and 5 Laminin G domains. See Fig. 3.

Segregation analysis has been performed. See Fig. 2.

In RP56K and RP81K, 2 pathogenic alleles were considered to be on different chromosomes (compound heterozygous). See Fig. 2.

Table 2

Summary of the very likely and possible pathogenic mutations identified in 100 Japanese arRP patients.

Allele frequencyComputational predictionc
Nucleotide changePredicted effectLocation in geneDomaina Conservation in hu/o/m/ho/d/op/p/c/z/drb ControlPatientFamily IDReferenceSpeciesSIFTPolyPhen2 (HumDiv)PMutSNAP
Very likely pathogenic mutations Insertion c.2522_2523insAp.Y841XExon 16EGFnot applicable0/4001/200RP81KThis studyJapanese
c.4957_4958insAp.S1653KfsX2Exon 26Close to coiled-coilnot applicable0/40015/200RP1H, RP3H, RP6H, RP12H, RP48K, RP51K, RP54K, RP44K, RP56K, RP87N, RP96H, RP100NThis studyJapanese
Nonsense c.8868C>Ap.Y2956XExon 44EGFnot applicable0/4005/200RP8H, RP25H, RP35K, RP80KThis studyJapanese
Deletion Deletion exon 32p.D2142_S2191delinsGExon 32Laminin Gnot applicable0/200d 2/200RP21HThis studyJapanese
Missense c.6557G>Ap.G2186EExon 32Laminin GG/G/G/G/G/-/-/-/-/-0/4002/200RP44K, RP81KAbd El-Aziz et al., 2010; Littink et al., 2010; This studyChinese, South Korean/American, JapaneseProbably damagingPathologicalNon-neutral
c.7793G>Ap.G2598DExon 40Close to Laminin GG/G/G/-/-/-/-/G/I/T0/4001/200RP87NThis studyJapaneseProbably damagingNon-neutral
c.8351T>Gp.L2784RExon 44Laminin GL/L/L/L/L/L/L/L/L/G0/4001/200RP56KThis studyJapaneseProbably damagingNon-neutral
Possible pathogenic mutations Missense c.77G>Ap.R26QExon 4Close to signal peptide cleavage siteR/R/R/K/K/-/-/-/-/-0/4001/200RP79KThis studyJapaneseAffected protein functionPathological
c.2923T>Cp.C975RExon 19EGFC/C/C/-/-/-/-/-/-/-0/4001/200RP83KThis studyJapanesePossibly damagingPathologicalNon-neutral
c.5404C>Tp.L1802FExon 26Close to Laminin GL/L/L/-/-/-/-/-/-/-0/4001/200RP74KThis studyJapanesePossibly damaging
c.5884A>Gp.T1962AExon 28Laminin GT/T/T/T/-/-/-/-/-/-0/4001/200RP53KThis studyJapanesePossibly damaging
c.8875C>Ap.L2959MExon 44EGFL/L/L/L/L/L/A/V/-/S0/4001/200RP9HThis studyJapanesePossibly damaging
c.9272T>Cp.I3091TExon 44Laminin GI/I/I/I/I/I/I/I/I/L0/4003/200RP4H, RP49K, RP55KThis studyJapaneseAffected protein functionProbably damaging

EYS contains a signal peptide, a putative coiled-coil, 29 EGF, and 5 laminin G domains. See Fig. 3.

hu/o/m/ho/d/op/p/c/z/dr denotes Human/Orangutan/Marmoset/Horse/Dog/Opossum/Platypus/Chicken/Zebrafish/Drosophila EYS orthologs, respectively. The hyphen (-) indicates that genomic sequence of corresponding region in the species was reported to be unknown [5].

SIFT, PolyPhen2 (only the HumDiv data are shown), PMut, and SNAP were used as reference data to evaluate the pathogenicity of the missense mutations. c.77G>A, c.2923T>C, c.7793G>A, c.8351T>G, and c.9272T>C were predicted to be pathogenic by a number of different computational prediction programs. In addition, the c.6557G>A mutation, which had been previously reported as disease causing, was classified as pathogenic by the PolyPhen2, PMut, and SNAP programs.

Homozygous exon 32 deletion mutation was not detected in 200 controls.

Electropherograms of the 6 likely pathogenic EYS mutations.

Partial sequence of the EYS gene showing the normal control sequences (A-1 through F-1), heterozygous mutation sequences (A-2 through F-2), and homozygous mutation sequences (A-3 and C-3). Deduced amino acids are indicated under the sequence trace. The mutation location is indicated either by an arrow (for a nucleotide change) or a horizontal line (to show 2 nucleotides between which the insertion occurred). (A) c.4957_4958insA; p.S1653KfsX2 (Exon 26), (B) c.6557G>A; p.G2186E (Exon 32), (C) c.8868C>A; p.Y2956X (Exon 44), (D) c.8351T>G; p.L2784R (Exon 44), (E) c.7793G>A; p.G2598D (Exon 40), (F) c.2522_2523insA; p.Y841X (Exon 16). Nucleotide numbering reflects cDNA numbering with +1 corresponding to the A of the ATG translation initiation codon in the reference sequence FM209056, according to the nomenclature recommended by the Human Genome Variation Society (www.hgvs.org/mutnomen). The initiation codon is codon 1. None of these 13 mutations were found in the Japanese controls. EYS has a signal peptide, a putative coiled-coil, 29 EGF, and 5 Laminin G domains. See Fig. 3.
Figure 3

Predicted domain structure and distribution of identified EYS mutations.

SMART (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/) and Pfam (http://pfam.sanger.ac.uk/) were used to search protein functional domains. A coiled-coil domain identified by Barragán et al. (2010) between the EGF-like domain and laminin G domain was also indicated. Novel very likely pathogenic mutations, novel possible pathogenic mutations, and a previously described mutation are shown in bold, normal, and italic type, respectively. Six out of 9 missense mutations were found in the EGF or laminin G domains. Furthermore, 7 were located in the latter half of the protein between the putative coiled-coil region and C-terminus.

Segregation analysis has been performed. See Fig. 2.
Figure 2

Pedigrees of the families that was available for mutation analysis.

Below the individuals, genotypes are presented for either p.S1653KfsX2 (M1), p.L2784R (M2), p.Y2956X (M3), p.Y841X (M4), or p.G2186E (M5) detected to segregate with RP. M1/M1 represents homozygous mutation. M1/+ indicates heterozygous carriers, +/+ indicates individuals carrying 2 wild-type alleles, whereas M1/M2 represents individuals presenting both mutations as compound heterozygous. Square boxes indicate men, circles denote women, and affected individuals are pointed out by a black symbol. Slashed symbols indicate deceased individuals. The probands are indicated with an arrow. NA denotes unavailable DNA samples.

In RP56K and RP81K, 2 pathogenic alleles were considered to be on different chromosomes (compound heterozygous). See Fig. 2. EYS contains a signal peptide, a putative coiled-coil, 29 EGF, and 5 laminin G domains. See Fig. 3. hu/o/m/ho/d/op/p/c/z/dr denotes Human/Orangutan/Marmoset/Horse/Dog/Opossum/Platypus/Chicken/Zebrafish/Drosophila EYS orthologs, respectively. The hyphen (-) indicates that genomic sequence of corresponding region in the species was reported to be unknown [5]. SIFT, PolyPhen2 (only the HumDiv data are shown), PMut, and SNAP were used as reference data to evaluate the pathogenicity of the missense mutations. c.77G>A, c.2923T>C, c.7793G>A, c.8351T>G, and c.9272T>C were predicted to be pathogenic by a number of different computational prediction programs. In addition, the c.6557G>A mutation, which had been previously reported as disease causing, was classified as pathogenic by the PolyPhen2, PMut, and SNAP programs. Homozygous exon 32 deletion mutation was not detected in 200 controls. A novel truncating insertion, c.4957_4958insA, was detected in 12 patients and accounted for 15 of the 35 mutated alleles detected (42.9%) (Table 1 and Table 2). Three patients were homozygous for the c.4957_4958insA mutation, and the other 9 patients were heterozygous. Of the latter, 3 patients showed the second mutation while 6 did not. This insertion creates a frameshift mutation that predicts a premature stop at codon 1654 (p.S1653KfsX2). A novel truncating nonsense mutation c.8868C>A (p.Y2956X) was identified in 4 patients and accounted for 5 of the 35 mutated alleles detected (14.3%). Thus, these 2 novel truncating mutations were identified in 16 separate patients, resulting in a very high frequency of the 2 mutations in Japanese arRP patients.

Families with very likely pathogenic mutations and both alleles affected

Nine of the 18 patients bearing very likely pathogenic mutations appeared to have both alleles affected, suggesting that they received one mutated allele from each unaffected parent (Table 1 and Table 2). In 4 patients (RP3H, RP48K, RP56K, and RP81K), segregation analysis was performed, and the 2 pathogenic alleles were considered to be on different chromosomes (Fig. 2). In RP3H, proband (II-6) was homozygous for c.4957_4958insA. The mutation co-segregated with the phenotype: the unaffected brother (II-4) demonstrated wild-type alleles, while the affected brother (II-5) was homozygous for the mutation. In RP48K, proband (II-1) was homozygous for c.4957_4958insA. The unaffected brother (II-2) was heterozygous for the mutation. In RP56K, proband (II-1) was compound heterozygous for c.4957_4958insA and missense mutation c.8351T>G (p.L2784R). The mutation co-segregated with the phenotype: the affected brother (II-2) also showed both mutations, while the unaffected brother (II-3) was heterozygous for c.4957_4958insA. In RP81K, proband (II-5) was compound heterozygous for truncating insertion c.2522_2523insA (p.Y841X) and missense mutation c.6557G>A (p.G2186E). This insertion results in premature termination of the encoded protein at codon 841 (p.Y841X). Missense mutation c.6557G>A has been previously reported as disease causing in one Korean/American and one Chinese patient [3], [6]. The unaffected mother (I-2) was heterozygous for c.2522_2523insA, while the unaffected sister (II-6) was heterozygous for c.6557G>A.

Pedigrees of the families that was available for mutation analysis.

Below the individuals, genotypes are presented for either p.S1653KfsX2 (M1), p.L2784R (M2), p.Y2956X (M3), p.Y841X (M4), or p.G2186E (M5) detected to segregate with RP. M1/M1 represents homozygous mutation. M1/+ indicates heterozygous carriers, +/+ indicates individuals carrying 2 wild-type alleles, whereas M1/M2 represents individuals presenting both mutations as compound heterozygous. Square boxes indicate men, circles denote women, and affected individuals are pointed out by a black symbol. Slashed symbols indicate deceased individuals. The probands are indicated with an arrow. NA denotes unavailable DNA samples. For the other patients, segregation analysis could not be performed due to difficulties in collecting samples from the families of patients (Table 1). RP54K and RP35K were homozygous for truncating mutation c.4957_4958insA and c.8868C>A, respectively. RP21H was homozygous for deletion in exon 32, an in-frame deletion that results in the replacement of amino acids from D2142 to S2191 with G2142 (p.D2142_S2191delinsG) and disrupts the second laminin G domain (Fig. 3). RP44K and RP87N were heterozygous for truncating and missense mutations, c.4957_4958insA/c.6657G>A (p.G2186E) and c.4957_4958insA/c.7793T>G (p.G2598D), respectively. None of these 7 very likely pathogenic mutations were found in the Japanese controls.

Predicted domain structure and distribution of identified EYS mutations.

SMART (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/) and Pfam (http://pfam.sanger.ac.uk/) were used to search protein functional domains. A coiled-coil domain identified by Barragán et al. (2010) between the EGF-like domain and laminin G domain was also indicated. Novel very likely pathogenic mutations, novel possible pathogenic mutations, and a previously described mutation are shown in bold, normal, and italic type, respectively. Six out of 9 missense mutations were found in the EGF or laminin G domains. Furthermore, 7 were located in the latter half of the protein between the putative coiled-coil region and C-terminus.

Families with single novel very likely pathogenic mutations

The rest of the patients comprising the group with very likely pathogenic mutations presented only single truncating mutations (Table 1 and Table 2). RP1H, RP6H, RP12H, RP51H, RP96H, and RP100N were heterozygous for c.4957_4958insA. RP8H, RP25H, and RP80K were heterozygous for c.8868C>A. Segregation analysis was performed in patient RP80K. The unaffected father (I-1) demonstrated wild-type alleles, and the unaffected mother (I-2) was heterozygous for the mutation (Fig. 2). In RP96H, we found very likely pathogenic missense mutation c.8923T>C (p.F2975L), which was not detected in any of the 400 control alleles. However, as c.8923T>C has been described as rs79036642 in the dbSNP database, it was assigned to the group of possible non-pathogenic sequence alterations (Table 3).
Table 3

Summary of the possible non-pathogenic sequence alterations in the EYS gene identified in this study.

Gene exonNucleotide changePredicted effectConservation in hu/o/m/ho/d/op/p/c/z/dra Patient frequencyControl frequencySNP IDReference
Exon 1c.-500A>G13/200rs1490127Abd El-Aziz et al., 2010
Exon 4c.334G>Ap.V112IV/I/I/I/I/I/-/-/-/E1/2000/192rs112609906
c.359C>Tp.T120MT/T/T/T/T/A/-/-/-/I60/200rs12193967Audo et al., 2010; Abd El-Aziz et al., 2010
c.525_527delGGAp.176delEE/E/E/E/E/A/-/-/-/G1/2001/192This study
Intron 5c.863-23_863-22insTT53/200rs34154043Abd El-Aziz et al., 2010
c.863-23_863-22insTTT44/200This study
Exon 6c.1005G>Tp.E335DE/E/D/-/-/-/-/-/-/-3/200rs80095433
Exon 7c.1146T>Cp.N382NN/N/T/-/-/-/-/-/-/-97/200rs974110Audo et al., 2010; Abd El-Aziz et al., 2010
Intron 8c.1300-3C>T117/200rs1936439Audo et al., 2010; Abd El-Aziz et al., 2010
Exon 9c.1382G>Ap.C461YC/C/Y/-/-/-/-/-/-/-8/2004/192rs76754818Littink et al., 2010
Intron 9c.1599+96A>C200/200rs1502963Abd El-Aziz et al., 2010
Intron 10c.1600-38G>A12/200rs1502965Abd El-Aziz et al., 2010
Exon 11c.1712A>Gp.Q571RQ/Q/Q/-/-/-/-/-/-/-26/200rs61753610Audo I et al., 2010
Exon 12c.1809C>Tp.V603VV/V/V/-/-/-/-/-/-/-178/200rs9345601Audo et al., 2010; Abd El-Aziz et al., 2010
c.1891G>Ap.G631SG/S/E/C/C/-/-/-/-/-178/200rs9342464Audo et al., 2010; Abd El-Aziz et al., 2010
c.1922A>Tp.E641VE/E/E/E/E/-/-/-/-/-18/200rs17411795Audo et al., 2010; Abd El-Aziz et al., 2010
c.1985G>Tp.R662MR/R/R/S/S/-/-/-/-/-8/2003/96This study
Intron 12c.2023+6_2023+7insT175/200rs67504324
c.2024-14C>T3/200rs45628235
Intron 15c.2382-26C>G106/200rs9445437
Exon 16c.2490T>Cp.P830PP/P/P/P/P/P/P/Q/P/-2/2001/392This study
c.2528G>Ap.G843EG/G/G/G/G/G/G/G/A/G16/2009/192rs74419361
c.2555T>Cp.L852PL/P/P/-/S/P/S/P/-/E106/200rs9294631Audo et al., 2010; Abd El-Aziz et al., 2010
Intron 18c.2846+52_2846+53insTAAT120/200rs66504228Abd El-Aziz et al., 2010
c.2847-24C>T178/200rs7743515
Exon 19c.2980C>Gp.P994AP/P/P/-/-/-/-/-/-/-3/2002/192This study
Intron 22c.3444-5C>T69/200rs9445051Audo et al., 2010; Abd El-Aziz et al., 2010
Intron 23c.3568+60delA1/200This study
Exon 25c.3787A>Gp.I1263VI/V/V/V/V/-/-/-/-/I36/200rs17404123Audo et al., 2010; Abd El-Aziz et al., 2010
c.3809T>Gp.V1270GV/V/V/V/V/-/-/-/-/P1/2001/192This study
Intron 25c.3877+17_22delAGATA36/200Barragán I et al., 2010
Exon 26c.3906C>Tp.H1302HH/H/H/H/H/-/-/-/-/S10/200rs12663916Audo et al., 2010; Abd El-Aziz et al., 2010
c.3936A>Gp.T1312TT/A/T/A/A/-/-/-/-/S10/200rs12662610Audo et al., 2010; Abd El-Aziz et al., 2010
c.3973C>Gp.Q1325EQ/E/K/K/K/-/-/-/-/S12/200rs12663622Audo et al., 2010; Abd El-Aziz et al., 2010
c.4026C>Tp.S1342SS/S/S/S/S/-/-/-/-/A10/200rs12663619Audo et al., 2010; Abd El-Aziz et al., 2010
c.4081A>Gp.I1361VI/I/T/V/V/-/-/-/-/S12/200rs17403955Audo et al., 2010; Abd El-Aziz et al., 2010
c.4256T>Cp.L1419SL/S/S/S/S/L/S/V/Q/V137/200rs624851Audo et al., 2010; Abd El-Aziz et al., 2010
c.4352T>Cp.I1451TI/T/T/K/K/-/-/-/-/T13/200rs62415828Audo et al., 2010; Abd El-Aziz et al., 2010
c.4543C>Tp.R1515WR/R/R/R/R/-/-/-/-/H36/200rs62415827Audo et al., 2010; Abd El-Aziz et al., 2010
c.4549A>Gp.S1517GS/G/D/T/T/-/-/-/-/H36/200rs62415826Audo et al., 2010; Abd El-Aziz et al., 2010
c.4593G>Ap.E1531EE/E/E/E/E/-/-/-/-/Q36/200rs62415825Audo et al., 2010; Abd El-Aziz et al., 2010
c.5244A>Cp.L1748FL/L/L/L/L/-/-/-/-/F8/200rs57312007Audo I et al., 2010; Littink et al., 2010
c.5617C>Gp.L1873VL/L/L/P/P/-/-/-/-/I38/200rs16895517Audo I et al., 2010
Exon 27c.5705A>Tp.N1902IN/N/N/N/N/P/-/R/-/A90/200rs9353806Audo et al., 2010; Abd El-Aziz et al., 2010
Intron 28c.5928-35T>C118/200rs587278Abd El-Aziz et al., 2010
Intron 29c.6078+68A>G81/200rs36133910Abd El-Aziz et al., 2010
c.6079-4_6079-3delTC87/200rs35395170Audo I et al., 2010
Intron 34c.6834+61T>G60/200rs66502009Abd El-Aziz et al., 2010
Exon 35c.6977G>Ap.R2326QR/R/R/L/L/L/L/L/I/L95/200rs4710457Audo et al., 2010; Abd El-Aziz et al., 2010
Exon 37c.7394C>Gp.T2465ST/T/T/T/T/T/T/T/S/F8/2002/176This study
Exon 39c.7666A>Tp.S2556CS/S/S/S/S/N/S/H/E/E57/200rs66462731Audo et al., 2010; Abd El-Aziz et al., 2010; Barragán et al., 2010; Littink et al., 2010
Intron 41c.8071+84T>G53/200rs4710257Abd El-Aziz et al., 2010
Exon 44c.8923T>Cp.F2975LF/F/F/F/F/F/F/F/-/K1/2000/400rs79036642
c.9300A>Gp.L3100LL/L/L/L/L/L/L/L/V/I4/2002/192This study

Fifty-four sequence alterations were identified in 100 patients. These alterations were predicted to be non-pathogenic for various reasons. Some have been reported as polymorphisms in previous reports. Newly identified alterations within the exons, except for c.334G>A and c.8923T>C, were also found in the control chromosome. The hyphen (-) indicates that genomic sequence of corresponding region in the species was reported to be unknown [5].

hu/o/m/ho/d/op/p/c/z/dr denotes Human/Orangutan/Marmoset/Horse/Dog/Opossum/Platypus/Chicken/Zebrafish/Drosophila EYS orthologs, respectively.

Fifty-four sequence alterations were identified in 100 patients. These alterations were predicted to be non-pathogenic for various reasons. Some have been reported as polymorphisms in previous reports. Newly identified alterations within the exons, except for c.334G>A and c.8923T>C, were also found in the control chromosome. The hyphen (-) indicates that genomic sequence of corresponding region in the species was reported to be unknown [5]. hu/o/m/ho/d/op/p/c/z/dr denotes Human/Orangutan/Marmoset/Horse/Dog/Opossum/Platypus/Chicken/Zebrafish/Drosophila EYS orthologs, respectively.

Families with single novel possible pathogenic mutations

A group of patients with possible pathogenic mutations had only single missense mutations (Table 1 and Table 2). We report 6 novel missense mutations in 8 different patients (Table 1 and Table 2), none of which were identified in the 400 Japanese control alleles. All amino acid residues affected by these mutations were compared with those encoded by orthologous genes of various vertebrates (orangutan, marmoset, horse, dog, opossum, platypus, chicken, and zebrafish) and Drosophila and found to be highly conserved across species (Table 2). The novel missense mutation c.2923T>C (p.C975R) was predicted to be pathogenic by 3 different computational prediction programs (PolyPhen2, PMut, and SNAP) (Table 2). RP4H, RP49K, and RP55K were heterozygous for the same missense mutation c.9272T>C (p.I3091T), which was predicted to be pathogenic by SIFT and PolyPhen2 programs (Table 2). In addition, 54 possible non-pathogenic sequence alterations were found, of which 9 were previously unreported (Table 3).

Screening of the 2 truncating mutations

We focused on 2 truncating mutations, c.4957_4958insA in exon 26 and c.8868C>A in exon 44, which were identified in 16 separate Japanese arRP patients in this study. The frequency of the 2 mutations was very high in this Japanese arRP cohort. However, we did not detect the 2 mutations in 19 Japanese adRP patients and 28 LCA patients who were recruited and screened to evaluate the frequency of the mutations. We also recruited 32 unrelated Korean arRP patients and screened for the 2 EYS gene mutations. The c.4957_4958insA mutation was detected in 2 patients and accounted for 3 of 64 Korean patient alleles (4.7%). One patient was homozygous and the other was heterozygous. The c.8868C>A mutation was identified in 1 patient and accounted for 1 of the 64 Korean patient alleles (1.6%).

Clinical findings

Nine Japanese patients with very likely pathogenic EYS gene mutations in both alleles, 9 Japanese patients with single very likely pathogenic changes, and a Korean patient with homozygous c.4957_4958insA mutation demonstrated classic RP with mostly night blindness as the initial symptom, followed by gradual constriction of the visual field. The fundus displayed bone spicules increasing in density with age and attenuated retinal vessels. Electroretinogram responses were not detectable, consistent with severe generalized rod-cone dysfunction. The remaining visual field determined using Goldmann kinetic perimetry with V-4 target ranged from approximately 10° to 60° of the central and inferior visual fields, respectively, in a 74-year-old woman (RP100N) to complete blindness in a 54-year-old man (RP21H). No remarkable clinical difference was observed between 9 patients with very likely pathogenic EYS gene mutations in both alleles and 9 patients with single very likely pathogenic changes.

Discussion

This study is the first to analyze mutations in the EYS gene among Japanese arRP patients. We detected 67 sequence alterations in the EYS gene, of which 21 were novel. Of these, 7 were very likely pathogenic mutations, 6 were possibly pathogenic mutations, and 54 were possible non-pathogenic sequence alterations (Table 1, Table 2, and Table 3). Considering only the very likely pathogenic mutations, the minimum observed prevalence of distinct EYS gene mutations in our study is 18% (18/100, 9 patients with 2 very likely pathogenic mutations and 9 with only one such mutations). Additionally, if the possible pathogenic mutations are included in the prevalence estimation, prevalence increases to 26% (26/100, with 17 of 26 patients presenting single mutations). The estimated prevalence in our study may be extremely high compared with those in the previous studies [3]–[6]. Until recently, mutations in 34 genes have been associated with arRP (http://www.sph.uth.tmc.edu/Retnet/). The most frequently mutated gene is USH2A, accounting for approximately 7% of arRP cases [9], [10], whereas most other genes contribute to only 1% to 2% of arRP cases [11]. The estimated prevalence of very likely and possible pathogenic mutations of the EYS gene in our study was 26%, suggesting its major involvement in the pathogenesis of arRP in the Japanese population. We found that 16% of Japanese arRP patients displayed at least one c.4957_4958insA or c.8868C>A mutation, which accounted for 57.1% (15+5/35) of the mutated alleles. Thus, these mutations seem to be frequent among Japanese arRP patients. Previous studies employing Indonesian, Pakistani, Chinese, Israeli, Spanish, French, British, Dutch, and Palestinian RP patient populations have not detected them [3]–[6], [12]–[15]. Since the Japanese were divided into small semi-closed population groups among which intercommunication was quite less until the mid-20th century, obvious or latent consanguineous marriages were carried out more frequently, leading to relatively high inbreeding levels in those populations. The frequency of the c.4957_4958insA and c.8868C>A mutations may result from a founder effect like that of the 2299delG USH2A gene mutation, which accounts for 44% of disease alleles in Danish and Norwegian patients with Usher syndrome type II [16]. We detected 13 different very likely and possible pathogenic mutations. Three were truncating mutations and accounted for 60% (21/35) of mutated alleles. Likewise, previous studies reported that most pathogenic mutations were truncated type (nonsense, deletion, insertion, or splicing) [3]–[6], [12]–[15]. Furthermore, c.6557G>A was the only mutation that was common between the Japanese and other populations. This mutation has been found in Korean/American and Chinese patients [3], [6]. These results indicate that the EYS gene mutation spectrum among Japanese patients largely differs from that among the previously mentioned non-Asian populations. The Japanese and Korean mutation spectrum may resemble each other, but an accurate comparison could not be made, because further EYS gene analysis of Korean RP patients is required to clarify this possibility. A second mutant allele could not be detected by direct sequencing in 17 of 26 patients in our study. Previous studies reported 7 of 10 [3] and 9 of 17 [5] patients with heterozygous EYS gene mutation, implying that this finding could be due to relatively large heterozygous deletions [15]. The second mutation in these families may also have been located within the gene regulatory elements or unknown exons including alternative splicing areas. Although rare, a single EYS mutation in combination with another mutation on a second gene could also explain this phenotype [3]. The c.4957_4958insA and c.8868C>A mutations were not detected in Japanese patients with adRP or with LCA. Abd El-Aziz et al. reported that EYS gene mutation screening did not reveal any pathogenic mutations in 95 British and Chinese adRP patients [3]. Bandah-Rosenfeld et al. reported that no mutation was found in 2 Oriental Jewish and Israeli Muslim LCA patients who had a large homozygous region harboring the EYS gene [12]. Although further analysis of all EYS gene exons is required, EYS gene mutations may not be detected in Japanese patients with adRP and LCA. The c.4957_4958insA and c.8868C>A mutations were also detected in Korean patients with arRP and accounted for 6.3% (4/64 alleles) of the disease alleles. Similar to Japanese arRP results, the c.4957_4958insA mutation was more frequently detected than the c.8868C>A mutation. The fact that both c.4957_4958insA and c.8868C>A mutations were also detected in Korean patients suggests the possibility that the mutations occurred in an ancient common ancestor and spread throughout East Asia. RP is a highly heterogeneous disease, with a reported prevalence rate of 1 in 4,000–8,000 people in Japan. Given the population of Japan, approximately a 100 million, the number of patients with RP can be estimated to be 12,500–25,000. The relative frequencies of RP inheritance patterns in Japanese patients were estimated as 25.2% for autosomal recessive, 16.9% for autosomal dominant, 1.6% for X-linked, and 56.3% for simplex, indicating that most Japanese RP patients represent arRP or isolated cases [17]. Autosomal recessive and simplex cases account over 80% of RP cases in Japan (approximately 10,000–20,000 people). Our results indicate that c.4957_4958insA and c.8868C>A mutations are possibly present in 1,600–3,200 Japanese patients with RP. These 2 novel mutations will be very useful for genetic diagnosis and counseling, and analysis of the mutated proteins may be helpful in the development of effective therapies for RP in Japan and Korea. In conclusion, mutation screening of the EYS gene in 100 Japanese patients revealed 13 different pathogenic mutations, confirming that the mutation spectrum in Japanese patients differs from the previously reported spectrum in patients of non-Asian populations. Among these 13 mutations, 2 truncating mutations, c.4957_4958insA and c.8868C>A, were detected in at least one mutated allele in 16% of Japanese arRP patients and may be the most frequent mutations causing RP in the Japanese populations. Screening for c.4957_4958insA and c.8868C>A mutations in the EYS gene is, therefore, very effective for the genetic testing and counseling of RP patients in Japan. Further analysis is necessary to obtain a more precise mutation spectrum and to identify other frequent mutations in other East Asian populations. PCR primer sequences for human . (DOC) Click here for additional data file.
  17 in total

1.  Mutations in the EYS gene account for approximately 5% of autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa and cause a fairly homogeneous phenotype.

Authors:  Karin W Littink; L Ingeborgh van den Born; Robert K Koenekoop; Rob W J Collin; Marijke N Zonneveld; Ellen A W Blokland; Hayat Khan; Thomas Theelen; Carel B Hoyng; Frans P M Cremers; Anneke I den Hollander; B Jeroen Klevering
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  EYS is a major gene for rod-cone dystrophies in France.

Authors:  Isabelle Audo; José-Alain Sahel; Saddek Mohand-Saïd; Marie-Elise Lancelot; Aline Antonio; Veselina Moskova-Doumanova; Emeline F Nandrot; Jordan Doumanov; Isabel Barragan; Guillermo Antinolo; Shomi S Bhattacharya; Christina Zeitz
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.878

3.  Copy-number variations in EYS: a significant event in the appearance of arRP.

Authors:  Juan I Pieras; Isabel Barragán; Salud Borrego; Isabelle Audo; María González-Del Pozo; Sara Bernal; Montserrat Baiget; Christina Zeitz; Shomi S Bhattacharya; Guillermo Antiñolo
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Missense mutation in the USH2A gene: association with recessive retinitis pigmentosa without hearing loss.

Authors:  C Rivolta; E A Sweklo; E L Berson; T P Dryja
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-04-20       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  A common ancestral origin of the frequent and widespread 2299delG USH2A mutation.

Authors:  B Dreyer; L Tranebjaerg; V Brox; T Rosenberg; C Möller; M Beneyto; M D Weston; W J Kimberling; C W Cremers; X Z Liu; O Nilssen
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-06-08       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Novel null mutations in the EYS gene are a frequent cause of autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa in the Israeli population.

Authors:  Dikla Bandah-Rozenfeld; Karin W Littink; Tamar Ben-Yosef; Tim M Strom; Itay Chowers; Rob W J Collin; Anneke I den Hollander; L Ingeborgh van den Born; Marijke N Zonneveld; Saul Merin; Eyal Banin; Frans P M Cremers; Dror Sharon
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Identification of a novel homozygous nonsense mutation in EYS in a Chinese family with autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Yukan Huang; Jing Zhang; Chang Li; Guohua Yang; Mugen Liu; Qing K Wang; Zhaohui Tang
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 2.103

8.  Identification of a 2 Mb human ortholog of Drosophila eyes shut/spacemaker that is mutated in patients with retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Rob W J Collin; Karin W Littink; B Jeroen Klevering; L Ingeborgh van den Born; Robert K Koenekoop; Marijke N Zonneveld; Ellen A W Blokland; Tim M Strom; Carel B Hoyng; Anneke I den Hollander; Frans P M Cremers
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Mutation spectrum of EYS in Spanish patients with autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Isabel Barragán; Salud Borrego; Juan Ignacio Pieras; María González-del Pozo; Javier Santoyo; Carmen Ayuso; Montserrat Baiget; José M Millan; Marcela Mena; Mai M Abd El-Aziz; Isabelle Audo; Christina Zeitz; Karin W Littink; Joaquín Dopazo; Shomi S Bhattacharya; Guillermo Antiñolo
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.878

10.  Missense mutations at homologous positions in the fourth and fifth laminin A G-like domains of eyes shut homolog cause autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Muhammad Imran Khan; Rob W J Collin; Kentar Arimadyo; Shazia Micheal; Maleeha Azam; Nadeem Qureshi; Sultana M H Faradz; Anneke I den Hollander; Raheel Qamar; Frans P M Cremers
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 2.367

View more
  46 in total

1.  Long-term clinical course of 2 Japanese patients with PRPF31-related retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Kentaro Kurata; Katsuhiro Hosono; Yoshihiro Hotta
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Digenic heterozygous mutations in EYS/LRP5 in a Chinese family with retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Feng-Juan Gao; Sheng-Hai Zhang; Jun-Yi Chen; Ge-Zhi Xu; Ji-Hong Wu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Development of a molecular diagnostic test for Retinitis Pigmentosa in the Japanese population.

Authors:  Akiko Maeda; Akiko Yoshida; Kanako Kawai; Yuki Arai; Ryutaro Akiba; Akira Inaba; Seiji Takagi; Ryoji Fujiki; Yasuhiko Hirami; Yasuo Kurimoto; Osamu Ohara; Masayo Takahashi
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  Clinical and genetic findings of a Japanese patient with RP1-related autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Kentaro Kurata; Katsuhiro Hosono; Yoshihiro Hotta
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Clinical characteristics of a Japanese patient with Bardet-Biedl syndrome caused by BBS10 mutations.

Authors:  Kentaro Kurata; Katsuhiro Hosono; Akiko Hikoya; Akihiko Kato; Hirotomo Saitsu; Shinsei Minoshima; Tsutomu Ogata; Yoshihiro Hotta
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 2.447

6.  Whole genome sequencing in patients with retinitis pigmentosa reveals pathogenic DNA structural changes and NEK2 as a new disease gene.

Authors:  Koji M Nishiguchi; Richard G Tearle; Yangfan P Liu; Edwin C Oh; Noriko Miyake; Paola Benaglio; Shyana Harper; Hanna Koskiniemi-Kuendig; Giulia Venturini; Dror Sharon; Robert K Koenekoop; Makoto Nakamura; Mineo Kondo; Shinji Ueno; Tetsuhiro R Yasuma; Jacques S Beckmann; Shiro Ikegawa; Naomichi Matsumoto; Hiroko Terasaki; Eliot L Berson; Nicholas Katsanis; Carlo Rivolta
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Simultaneous expression of two pathogenic genes in four Chinese patients affected with inherited retinal dystrophy.

Authors:  Xiao-Zhen Liu; Tian-Chang Tao; Hong Qi; Shan-Na Feng; Ning-Ning Chen; Lin Zhao; Zhi-Zhong Ma; Gen-Lin Li; Li-Ping Yang
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

8.  Autosomal recessive cone-rod dystrophy associated with compound heterozygous mutations in the EYS gene.

Authors:  Satoshi Katagiri; Masakazu Akahori; Takaaki Hayashi; Kazutoshi Yoshitake; Tamaki Gekka; Kazuho Ikeo; Hiroshi Tsuneoka; Takeshi Iwata
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Next-generation sequencing-based molecular diagnosis of a Chinese patient cohort with autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Qing Fu; Feng Wang; Hui Wang; Fei Xu; Jacques E Zaneveld; Huanan Ren; Vafa Keser; Irma Lopez; Han-Fang Tuan; Jason S Salvo; Xia Wang; Li Zhao; Keqing Wang; Yumei Li; Robert K Koenekoop; Rui Chen; Ruifang Sui
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  The first USH2A mutation analysis of Japanese autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa patients: a totally different mutation profile with the lack of frequent mutations found in Caucasian patients.

Authors:  Yang Zhao; Katsuhiro Hosono; Kimiko Suto; Chie Ishigami; Yuuki Arai; Akiko Hikoya; Yasuhiko Hirami; Masafumi Ohtsubo; Shinji Ueno; Hiroko Terasaki; Miho Sato; Hiroshi Nakanishi; Shiori Endo; Kunihiro Mizuta; Hiroyuki Mineta; Mineo Kondo; Masayo Takahashi; Shinsei Minoshima; Yoshihiro Hotta
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 3.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.