Literature DB >> 22363039

Concept analysis of good death in terminally ill patients.

Clara Granda-Cameron1, Arlene Houldin.   

Abstract

The purpose of this concept analysis of good death was to examine the attributes of a good death and explore the changes of the concept over time and its impact on terminally ill patients. The method used for this analysis was the Rodgers' evolutionary method. A literature search was completed using Medline Ovid and Journal Storage (JSTOR).The findings describe the evolution of the good death concept over time from the prehistoric era followed by premodern, modern, and postmodern times. In addition, information is presented about surrogate terms, attributes, antecedents, and consequences associated with good death followed by analysis and discussion of the findings. General attributes of a good death include pain and symptom management, awareness of death, patient's dignity, family presence, family support, and communication among patient, family, and health care providers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22363039     DOI: 10.1177/1049909111434976

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care        ISSN: 1049-9091            Impact factor:   2.500


  12 in total

Review 1.  Defining a Good Death (Successful Dying): Literature Review and a Call for Research and Public Dialogue.

Authors:  Emily A Meier; Jarred V Gallegos; Lori P Montross Thomas; Colin A Depp; Scott A Irwin; Dilip V Jeste
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 4.105

2.  Priorities of a "good death" according to cancer patients, their family caregivers, physicians, and the general population: a nationwide survey.

Authors:  Young Ho Yun; Kyoung-Nam Kim; Jin-Ah Sim; EunKyo Kang; Jihye Lee; Jiyeon Choo; Shin Hye Yoo; Miso Kim; Young Ae Kim; Beo Deul Kang; Hyun-Jeong Shim; Eun-Kee Song; Jung Hun Kang; Jung Hye Kwon; Jung Lim Lee; Soon Nam Lee; Chi Hoon Maeng; Eun Joo Kang; Young Rok Do; Yoon Seok Choi; Kyung Hae Jung
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-04-22       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  A good death from the perspective of palliative cancer patients.

Authors:  Lisa Kastbom; Anna Milberg; Marit Karlsson
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-11-12       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Dying within dying: Ethical dilemmas of treating terminally ill patients with acute life-threatening illnesses.

Authors:  Shahla Siddiqui
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-05

Review 5.  Still Searching: A Meta-Synthesis of a Good Death from the Bereaved Family Member Perspective.

Authors:  Kelly E Tenzek; Rachel Depner
Journal:  Behav Sci (Basel)       Date:  2017-04-25

6.  Parenteral Lidocaine for Complex Cancer Pain in the Home or Inpatient Hospice Setting: A Review and Synthesis of the Evidence.

Authors:  Poh Heng Chong; Zhi Zheng Yeo
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 2.947

7.  What are the personal last wishes of people with a life-limiting illness? Findings from a longitudinal observational study in specialist palliative care.

Authors:  Anneke Ullrich; Wiebke Hollburg; Holger Schulz; Sven Goldbach; Annette Rommel; Marten Müller; Denise Kirsch; Katrin Kopplin-Foertsch; Julia Messerer; Louise König; Frank Schulz-Kindermann; Carsten Bokemeyer; Karin Oechsle
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 3.234

8.  Pain talk in hospice care: a conversation analysis.

Authors:  Yijin Wu
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 3.234

9.  Voices that matter: end-of-life care in two acute hospitals from the perspective of bereaved relatives.

Authors:  Sarah Donnelly; Geraldine Prizeman; Diarmuid Ó Coimín; Bettina Korn; Geralyn Hynes
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 3.234

10.  Comparison of attitudes towards five end-of-life care interventions (active pain control, withdrawal of futile life-sustaining treatment, passive euthanasia, active euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide): a multicentred cross-sectional survey of Korean patients with cancer, their family caregivers, physicians and the general Korean population.

Authors:  Young Ho Yun; Kyoung-Nam Kim; Jin-Ah Sim; Shin Hye Yoo; Miso Kim; Young Ae Kim; Beo Deul Kang; Hyun-Jeong Shim; Eun-Kee Song; Jung Hun Kang; Jung Hye Kwon; Jung Lim Lee; Eun Mi Nam; Chi Hoon Maeng; Eun Joo Kang; Young Rok Do; Yoon Seok Choi; Kyung Hae Jung
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.