Literature DB >> 22362868

What reaches the antenna? How to calibrate odor flux and ligand-receptor affinities.

Martin N Andersson1, Fredrik Schlyter, Sharon Rose Hill, Teun Dekker.   

Abstract

Physiological studies on olfaction frequently ignore the airborne quantities of stimuli reaching the sensory organ. We used a gas chromatography-calibrated photoionization detector to estimate quantities released from standard Pasteur pipette stimulus cartridges during repeated puffing of 27 compounds and verified how lack of quantification could obscure olfactory sensory neuron (OSN) affinities. Chemical structure of the stimulus, solvent, dose, storage condition, puff interval, and puff number all influenced airborne quantities. A model including boiling point and lipophilicity, but excluding vapor pressure, predicted airborne quantities from stimuli in paraffin oil on filter paper. We recorded OSN responses of Drosophila melanogaster, Ips typographus, and Culex quinquefasciatus, to known quantities of airborne stimuli. These demonstrate that inferred OSN tuning width, ligand affinity, and classification can be confounded and require stimulus quantification. Additionally, proper dose-response analysis shows that Drosophila AB3A OSNs are not promiscuous, but highly specific for ethyl hexanoate, with other earlier proposed ligands 10- to 10 000-fold less potent. Finally, we reanalyzed published Drosophila OSN data (DoOR) and demonstrate substantial shifts in affinities after compensation for quantity and puff number. We conclude that consistent experimental protocols are necessary for correct OSN classification and present some simple rules that make calibration, even retroactively, readily possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22362868     DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjs009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  19 in total

Review 1.  Evolution, developmental expression and function of odorant receptors in insects.

Authors:  Hua Yan; Shadi Jafari; Gregory Pask; Xiaofan Zhou; Danny Reinberg; Claude Desplan
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Controlling and measuring dynamic odorant stimuli in the laboratory.

Authors:  Srinivas Gorur-Shandilya; Carlotta Martelli; Mahmut Demir; Thierry Emonet
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Modulation of reproductive behaviors by non-host volatiles in the polyphagous Egyptian cotton leafworm, Spodoptera littoralis.

Authors:  Muhammad Binyameen; Altaf Hussain; Fatemeh Yousefi; Göran Birgersson; Fredrik Schlyter
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Structured Odorant Response Patterns across a Complete Olfactory Receptor Neuron Population.

Authors:  Guangwei Si; Jessleen K Kanwal; Yu Hu; Christopher J Tabone; Jacob Baron; Matthew Berck; Gaetan Vignoud; Aravinthan D T Samuel
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Functional diversity among sensory receptors in a Drosophila olfactory circuit.

Authors:  Dennis Mathew; Carlotta Martelli; Elizabeth Kelley-Swift; Christopher Brusalis; Marc Gershow; Aravinthan D T Samuel; Thierry Emonet; John R Carlson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Intensity invariant dynamics and odor-specific latencies in olfactory receptor neuron response.

Authors:  Carlotta Martelli; John R Carlson; Thierry Emonet
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Non-host volatile blend optimization for forest protection against the European spruce bark beetle, Ips typographus.

Authors:  C Rikard Unelius; Christian Schiebe; Björn Bohman; Martin N Andersson; Fredrik Schlyter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  DoOR 2.0--Comprehensive Mapping of Drosophila melanogaster Odorant Responses.

Authors:  Daniel Münch; C Giovanni Galizia
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  North American Lauraceae: terpenoid emissions, relative attraction and boring preferences of redbay ambrosia beetle, Xyleborus glabratus (coleoptera: curculionidae: scolytinae).

Authors:  Paul E Kendra; Wayne S Montgomery; Jerome Niogret; Grechen E Pruett; Albert E Mayfield; Martin MacKenzie; Mark A Deyrup; Gary R Bauchan; Randy C Ploetz; Nancy D Epsky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Differential Contributions of Olfactory Receptor Neurons in a Drosophila Olfactory Circuit.

Authors:  Gunnar Newquist; Alexandra Novenschi; Donovan Kohler; Dennis Mathew
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2016-07-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.