Literature DB >> 22362824

Long-term safety of pegvisomant in patients with acromegaly: comprehensive review of 1288 subjects in ACROSTUDY.

A J van der Lely1, Beverly M K Biller, Thierry Brue, Michael Buchfelder, Ezio Ghigo, Roy Gomez, Judith Hey-Hadavi, Frida Lundgren, Natasa Rajicic, Christian J Strasburger, Susan M Webb, Maria Koltowska-Häggström.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Pegvisomant is a GH receptor antagonist. The ACROSTUDY is a global safety surveillance study of long-term treatment of acromegaly with pegvisomant.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to monitor long-term safety and treatment outcomes.
DESIGN: ACROSTUDY is open to all patients with acromegaly who are treated with pegvisomant. We report an interim analysis of data captured from 1288 subjects enrolled before a database freeze of December 31, 2009.
SETTING: This was a global noninterventional surveillance study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Long-term monitoring of safety, including central magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reading and treatment outcomes, was measured.
RESULTS: Subjects (n = 1288) were treated with pegvisomant for a mean of 3.7 yr and followed up in ACROSTUDY for a mean of 2.1 yr. A total of 1147 adverse events (AE) were recorded in 477 subjects (37%), among which 192 AE in 124 subjects (9.6%) were considered to be related to pegvisomant. Serious AE were recorded in 159 subjects (12.3%), whereas pegvisomant-related Serious AE were recorded in 26 subjects (2%). No deaths (15 subjects; 1.2%) were attributed to pegvisomant use. The incidence of increase in pituitary tumor size in the subset with confirmed MRI increases on central reading represented 3.2% of the overall cohort with at least two available MRI (n = 936). Injection-site reactions were reported in 28 cases (2.2%). In 30 patients (2.5%), an elevated aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase of more than 3 times the upper level of normality was reported. There were no reports of liver failure. After 5 yr of pegvisomant treatment, 63.2% of subjects had normal IGF-I levels at a mean dose of 18 mg/d.
CONCLUSIONS: Data entered and evaluated in ACROSTUDY indicate that pegvisomant is an effective and safe medical treatment in patients with acromegaly. The reported low incidence of pituitary tumor size increase, liver enzyme elevations, and lipodystrophy at the injection site are reassuring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22362824     DOI: 10.1210/jc.2011-2508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  66 in total

1.  ACROSTUDY: the Italian experience.

Authors:  S Grottoli; P Maffei; F Bogazzi; S Cannavò; A Colao; E Ghigo; R Gomez; E Graziano; M Monterubbianesi; P Jonsson; L De Marinis
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 3.633

2.  How to improve effectiveness of pegvisomant treatment in acromegalic patients.

Authors:  M Ragonese; S Grottoli; P Maffei; A Alibrandi; M R Ambrosio; G Arnaldi; A Bianchi; S Puglisi; M C Zatelli; L De Marinis; E Ghigo; A Giustina; F Maffezzoni; C Martini; L Trementino; S Cannavo
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 3.  Update on prognostic factors in acromegaly: Is a risk score possible?

Authors:  E Fernandez-Rodriguez; F F Casanueva; I Bernabeu
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 4.  Pegvisomant: a growth hormone receptor antagonist used in the treatment of acromegaly.

Authors:  Nicholas A Tritos; Beverly M K Biller
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 5.  Expert consensus document: A consensus on the medical treatment of acromegaly.

Authors:  Andrea Giustina; Philippe Chanson; David Kleinberg; Marcello D Bronstein; David R Clemmons; Anne Klibanski; Aart J van der Lely; Christian J Strasburger; Steven W Lamberts; Ken K Y Ho; Felipe F Casanueva; Shlomo Melmed
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 43.330

6.  Does pegvisomant treatment expertise improve control of resistant acromegaly? The Italian ACROSTUDY experience.

Authors:  S Cannavo; F Bogazzi; A Colao; L De Marinis; P Maffei; R Gomez; E Graziano; M Monterubbianesi; S Grottoli
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 4.256

7.  Effectiveness and safety of pegvisomant: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational longitudinal studies.

Authors:  Letícia P Leonart; Fernanda S Tonin; Vinicius L Ferreira; Fernando Fernandez-Llimos; Roberto Pontarolo
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2018-08-25       Impact factor: 3.633

8.  Safety and efficacy of repeat radiosurgery for acromegaly: an International Multi-Institutional Study.

Authors:  Clayton E Alonso; Adomas Bunevicius; Daniel M Trifiletti; James Larner; Cheng-Chia Lee; Fu-Yuan Pai; Roman Liscak; Mikulas Kosak; Hideyuki Kano; Nathaniel D Sisterson; David Mathieu; L Dade Lunsford; Jason P Sheehan
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 9.  New therapeutic agents for acromegaly.

Authors:  Shlomo Melmed
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 43.330

Review 10.  Pituitary gigantism: update on molecular biology and management.

Authors:  Maya B Lodish; Giampaolo Trivellin; Constantine A Stratakis
Journal:  Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.243

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.