Literature DB >> 22362655

Using R and WinBUGS to fit a generalized partial credit model for developing and evaluating patient-reported outcomes assessments.

Yuelin Li1, Ray Baser.   

Abstract

The US Food and Drug Administration recently announced the final guidelines on the development and validation of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) assessments in drug labeling and clinical trials. This guidance paper may boost the demand for new PRO survey questionnaires. Henceforth, biostatisticians may encounter psychometric methods more frequently, particularly item response theory (IRT) models to guide the shortening of a PRO assessment instrument. This article aims to provide an introduction on the theory and practical analytic skills in fitting a generalized partial credit model (GPCM) in IRT. GPCM theory is explained first, with special attention to a clearer exposition of the formal mathematics than what is typically available in the psychometric literature. Then, a worked example is presented, using self-reported responses taken from the international personality item pool. The worked example contains step-by-step guides on using the statistical languages r and WinBUGS in fitting the GPCM. Finally, the Fisher information function of the GPCM model is derived and used to evaluate, as an illustrative example, the usefulness of assessment items by their information contents. This article aims to encourage biostatisticians to apply IRT models in the re-analysis of existing data and in future research.
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22362655      PMCID: PMC3926129          DOI: 10.1002/sim.4475

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  9 in total

1.  Validity: on meaningful interpretation of assessment data.

Authors:  Susan M Downing
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.251

2.  Using SAS PROC NLMIXED to fit item response theory models.

Authors:  Ching-Fan Sheu; Cheng-Te Chen; Ya-Hui Su; Wen-Chung Wang
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2005-05

3.  Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS).

Authors:  Bryce B Reeve; Ron D Hays; Jakob B Bjorner; Karon F Cook; Paul K Crane; Jeanne A Teresi; David Thissen; Dennis A Revicki; David J Weiss; Ronald K Hambleton; Honghu Liu; Richard Gershon; Steven P Reise; Jin-shei Lai; David Cella
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Developing tailored instruments: item banking and computerized adaptive assessment.

Authors:  Jakob Bue Bjorner; Chih-Hung Chang; David Thissen; Bryce B Reeve
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Hip psychometrics.

Authors:  Peter Baldwin; Joseph Bernstein; Howard Wainer
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008.

Authors:  David Cella; William Riley; Arthur Stone; Nan Rothrock; Bryce Reeve; Susan Yount; Dagmar Amtmann; Rita Bode; Daniel Buysse; Seung Choi; Karon Cook; Robert Devellis; Darren DeWalt; James F Fries; Richard Gershon; Elizabeth A Hahn; Jin-Shei Lai; Paul Pilkonis; Dennis Revicki; Matthias Rose; Kevin Weinfurt; Ron Hays
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  Minimum skills required by children to complete health-related quality of life instruments for asthma: comparison of measurement properties.

Authors:  E F Juniper; G H Guyatt; D H Feeny; L E Griffith; P J Ferrie
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 16.671

8.  Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance.

Authors: 
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 3.186

9.  Cluster-Rasch models for microarray gene expression data.

Authors:  H Li; F Hong
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2001-07-31       Impact factor: 13.583

  9 in total
  6 in total

1.  Using SAS PROC MCMC for Item Response Theory Models.

Authors:  Allison J Ames; Kelli Samonte
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 2.821

2.  Confirmatory Factor Analysis Alternative: Free, Accessible CBID Software.

Authors:  Marjorie Bott; Alex G Karanevich; Lili Garrard; Larry R Price; Dinesh Pal Mudaranthakam; Byron Gajewski
Journal:  West J Nurs Res       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 1.967

3.  Examining the Association between Patient-Reported Symptoms of Attention and Memory Dysfunction with Objective Cognitive Performance: A Latent Regression Rasch Model Approach.

Authors:  Yuelin Li; James C Root; Thomas M Atkinson; Tim A Ahles
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2016-04-24       Impact factor: 2.813

4.  Diagnostic Validity of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder - 7 (GAD-7) among Pregnant Women.

Authors:  Qiu-Yue Zhong; Bizu Gelaye; Alan M Zaslavsky; Jesse R Fann; Marta B Rondon; Sixto E Sánchez; Michelle A Williams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Measurement and control of bias in patient reported outcomes using multidimensional item response theory.

Authors:  N Maritza Dowling; Daniel M Bolt; Sien Deng; Chenxi Li
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 4.615

6.  Genes, Culture and Conservatism-A Psychometric-Genetic Approach.

Authors:  Inga Schwabe; Wilfried Jonker; Stéphanie M van den Berg
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 2.805

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.