OBJECTIVES: To determine whether preplacement recommendations following an occupationally focused medical history is different from those following an occupational consultation. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 172 applicants to our institution. RESULTS: Following provider review of occupational history survey alone, none of the applicants had restrictions recommended. In comparison, only 163 applicants (94.7%) were recommended to be hired without restrictions following provider review of the same patient's occupational history and examination (P = 0.0078). CONCLUSION: A well-designed questionnaire is useful for screening applicants for preplacement examinations and assures sufficient detail to allow for a large proportion of individuals to proceed to employment without an occupational examination. However, in this study, a small but statistically significant portion (5%) of applicants required occupational examinations for appropriate work recommendations.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether preplacement recommendations following an occupationally focused medical history is different from those following an occupational consultation. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 172 applicants to our institution. RESULTS: Following provider review of occupational history survey alone, none of the applicants had restrictions recommended. In comparison, only 163 applicants (94.7%) were recommended to be hired without restrictions following provider review of the same patient's occupational history and examination (P = 0.0078). CONCLUSION: A well-designed questionnaire is useful for screening applicants for preplacement examinations and assures sufficient detail to allow for a large proportion of individuals to proceed to employment without an occupational examination. However, in this study, a small but statistically significant portion (5%) of applicants required occupational examinations for appropriate work recommendations.
Authors: R D Newcomb; M W Steffen; L E Breeher; G M Sturchio; M H Murad; Z Wang; R G Molella Journal: Occup Med (Lond) Date: 2016-05-06 Impact factor: 1.611