Literature DB >> 22361991

Is an occupational examination superior to an occupational health history alone for preplacement screening in health care settings?

Richard D Newcomb1, Robin G Molella, Prathibha Varkey, Glenn M Sturchio, Philip T Hagen, Stephen S Cha, William G Buchta.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether preplacement recommendations following an occupationally focused medical history is different from those following an occupational consultation.
METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 172 applicants to our institution.
RESULTS: Following provider review of occupational history survey alone, none of the applicants had restrictions recommended. In comparison, only 163 applicants (94.7%) were recommended to be hired without restrictions following provider review of the same patient's occupational history and examination (P = 0.0078).
CONCLUSION: A well-designed questionnaire is useful for screening applicants for preplacement examinations and assures sufficient detail to allow for a large proportion of individuals to proceed to employment without an occupational examination. However, in this study, a small but statistically significant portion (5%) of applicants required occupational examinations for appropriate work recommendations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22361991     DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e318246f1b7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1076-2752            Impact factor:   2.162


  1 in total

1.  Screening for depression in the occupational health setting.

Authors:  R D Newcomb; M W Steffen; L E Breeher; G M Sturchio; M H Murad; Z Wang; R G Molella
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 1.611

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.