Literature DB >> 22361976

Post-operative guidelines following hip arthroscopy.

Jaime Edelstein1, Anil Ranawat, Keelan R Enseki, Richard J Yun, Peter Draovitch.   

Abstract

Rehabilitation following hip arthroscopy can vary significantly. Existing programs have been developed as a collaborative effort between physicians and rehabilitation specialists. The evolution of protocol advancement has relied upon feedback from patients, therapists and observable outcomes. Although reports of the first femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) surgeries were reported in the 1930's, it was not until recently that more structured, physiologically based guidelines have been developed and executed. Four phases have been developed in this guideline based on functional and healing milestones achieved which allow the patient to progress to the next level of activity. The goal of Phase I, the protective phase, is to progressively regain 75% of full range of motion (ROM) and normalize gait while respecting the healing process. The primary goal of Phase II is for the patient to gain function and independence in daily activities without discomfort. Rehabilitation goals include uncompensated step up/down on an 8 inch box, as well as, adequate pelvic control during low demand exercises. Phase III goals strive to accomplish pain free, non-compensated recreational activities and higher demand work functions. Manual muscle testing (MMT) grading of 5/5 should be achieved for all hip girdle musculature and an ability to dynamically control body weight in space. Phase IV requires the patient be independent with home and gym programs and be asymptomatic and pain free following workouts. Return to running may be commenced at the 12 week mark, but the proceeding requirements must be achieved. Athletes undergoing the procedure may have an accelerated timetable, based on the underlying pathology. Recognizing the patient's pre-operative health status and post-operative physical demands will direct both the program design and the program timetable.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22361976      PMCID: PMC3535124          DOI: 10.1007/s12178-011-9107-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med        ISSN: 1935-9748


  27 in total

1.  Kinematic analysis of the hip and trunk during bilateral stance on firm, foam, and multiaxial support surfaces.

Authors:  J Troy Blackburn; Bryan L Riemann; Joseph B Myers; Scott M Lephart
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 2.  Rehabilitation following hip arthroscopy.

Authors:  Steve Stalzer; Michael Wahoff; Molly Scanlan
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.182

3.  Arthroscopic versus open osteoplasty of the head-neck junction: a cadaveric investigation.

Authors:  Patrick S Sussmann; Anil S Ranawat; Joseph Lipman; Dean G Lorich; Douglas E Padgett; Bryan T Kelly
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-10-29       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  Gluteal muscle activation during common therapeutic exercises.

Authors:  Lindsay J Distefano; J Troy Blackburn; Stephen W Marshall; Darin A Padua
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.751

5.  Continuous passive motion applied to whole joints stimulates chondrocyte biosynthesis of PRG4.

Authors:  G E Nugent-Derfus; T Takara; J K O'neill; S B Cahill; S Görtz; T Pong; H Inoue; N M Aneloski; W W Wang; K I Vega; T J Klein; N D Hsieh-Bonassera; W C Bae; J D Burke; W D Bugbee; R L Sah
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 6.576

Review 6.  Review of anatomy, evaluation, and treatment of musculoskeletal pelvic floor pain in women.

Authors:  Heidi Prather; Sheila Dugan; Colleen Fitzgerald; Devyani Hunt
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.298

7.  Arthroscopic femoroplasty in the management of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  J W Thomas Byrd; Kay S Jones
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Radiologic and intraoperative findings in revision hip arthroscopy.

Authors:  Benton E Heyworth; Michael K Shindle; James E Voos; Jonas R Rudzki; Bryan T Kelly
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 9.  The etiology of osteoarthritis of the hip: an integrated mechanical concept.

Authors:  Reinhold Ganz; Michael Leunig; Katharina Leunig-Ganz; William H Harris
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  The management of labral tears and femoroacetabular impingement of the hip in the young, active patient.

Authors:  Asheesh Bedi; Neal Chen; William Robertson; Bryan T Kelly
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.772

View more
  22 in total

1.  Guidelines and pitfalls for the rehabilitation following hip arthroscopy.

Authors:  Philip Malloy; Molly Malloy; Peter Draovitch
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2013-09

2.  Rehabilitation after labral repair and femoroacetabular decompression: criteria-based progression through the return to sport phase.

Authors:  Michael Wahoff; Steve Dischiavi; Jenna Hodge; Joseph D Pharez
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2014-11

3.  Using Mobile Tracking Technology to Visualize the Trajectory of Recovery After Hip Arthroscopy: a Case Report.

Authors:  Nabil Mehta; Claire Steiner; Kara G Fields; Danyal H Nawabi; Stephen L Lyman
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2017-04-17

4.  Pendulum Exercises After Hip Arthroscopy: A Video Technique.

Authors:  Ryan Sauber; George Saborio; Beth M Nickel; Benjamin R Kivlan; John J Christoforetti
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2016-08-15

5.  Hip arthroscopy with labral repair for femoroacetabular impingement: short-term outcomes.

Authors:  Christian Dippmann; Kristian Thorborg; Otto Kraemer; Søren Winge; Henrik Palm; Per Hölmich
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Rehabilitation following hip arthroscopy: an evolving process.

Authors:  Keelan R Enseki; David Kohlrieser
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2014-11

7.  A FOUR-PHASE PHYSICAL THERAPY REGIMEN FOR RETURNING ATHLETES TO SPORT FOLLOWING HIP ARTHROSCOPY FOR FEMOROACETABULAR IMPINGEMENT WITH ROUTINE CAPSULAR CLOSURE.

Authors:  Benjamin D Kuhns; Alexander E Weber; Brian Batko; Shane J Nho; Catherine Stegemann
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2017-08

8.  Sex Differences in Self-Reported Hip Function Up to 2 Years After Arthroscopic Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement.

Authors:  Roody Joseph; Xueliang Pan; Kathleen Cenkus; Lindsey Brown; Thomas Ellis; Stephanie Di Stasi
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  REHABILITATION AFTER HIP ARTHROSCOPY AND LABRAL REPAIR IN A HIGH SCHOOL FOOTBALL ATHLETE: A 3.6 YEAR FOLLOW-UP WITH INSIGHT INTO POTENTIAL RISK FACTORS.

Authors:  Scott W Cheatham; Morey J Kolber
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2015-08

10.  FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES OF HIP ARTHROSCOPY IN AN ACTIVE DUTY MILITARY POPULATION UTILIZING A CRITERION-BASED EARLY WEIGHT BEARING PROGRESSION.

Authors:  K Aaron Shaw; Jeremy M Jacobs; J Richard Evanson; Josh Pniewski; Michelle L Dickston; Terry Mueller; John A Bojescul
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2017-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.