Literature DB >> 22361901

A closer look revisited: are we subjects or are we donors?

Rebecca Fisher1.   

Abstract

The author offers personal reflections on the implications of the article "Managing Incidental Findings & Research Results in Genomic Research Involving Biobanks & Archived Datasets" in terms of how the article addresses serious knowledge disparities and differing expectations between participants and researchers.Genet Med 2012:14(4):458-460.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2012        PMID： 22361901     DOI： 10.1038/gim.2012.6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN： 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  4 in total

1.  Incidental variants are critical for genomics.

Authors:  Leslie G Biesecker
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Informed consent for next-generation nucleotide sequencing studies: Aiding communication between participants and investigators.

Authors:  Rhonda G Kost; Stephen M Poppel; Barry S Coller
Journal:  J Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2017-02-07

3.  Self-guided management of exome and whole-genome sequencing results: changing the results return model.

Authors:  Joon-Ho Yu; Seema M Jamal; Holly K Tabor; Michael J Bamshad
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 4.  Practical, ethical and regulatory considerations for the evolving medical and research genomics landscape.

Authors:  Gholson J Lyon; Jeremy P Segal
Journal:  Appl Transl Genom       Date:  2013-02-26
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.