OBJECTIVE: Recognizing the need for a consensus tool to measure social class in health sciences, in 1995 the Spanish Society of Epidemiology (Sociedad Española de Epidemiología [SEE]) made a proposal for such a measure. The aim of this article was to explore the bibliometric impact of the SEE's proposal. METHODS: Articles citing the SEE's report and those citing articles published as a result of the report were identified using Google Scholar and Scopus. The information extracted from these articles consisted of year, nationality and impact factor of the journal, self-citation, information source, subject area, city of the first author, type of publication, study design, use of social class as a variable, number of social class categories, and the use of education or occupation to determine social class. RESULTS: The number of citations progressively increased. Citations also showed heterogeneity in the subject. Generally, citations were found in original articles and articles with a cross sectional design, were published in journals with impact factor and were by researchers working in Barcelona or Madrid. CONCLUSIONS: The SEE's proposal has proved to be an increasingly useful tool, applicable in different contexts. As suggested by the SEE, this proposal may need to be updated.
OBJECTIVE: Recognizing the need for a consensus tool to measure social class in health sciences, in 1995 the Spanish Society of Epidemiology (Sociedad Española de Epidemiología [SEE]) made a proposal for such a measure. The aim of this article was to explore the bibliometric impact of the SEE's proposal. METHODS: Articles citing the SEE's report and those citing articles published as a result of the report were identified using Google Scholar and Scopus. The information extracted from these articles consisted of year, nationality and impact factor of the journal, self-citation, information source, subject area, city of the first author, type of publication, study design, use of social class as a variable, number of social class categories, and the use of education or occupation to determine social class. RESULTS: The number of citations progressively increased. Citations also showed heterogeneity in the subject. Generally, citations were found in original articles and articles with a cross sectional design, were published in journals with impact factor and were by researchers working in Barcelona or Madrid. CONCLUSIONS: The SEE's proposal has proved to be an increasingly useful tool, applicable in different contexts. As suggested by the SEE, this proposal may need to be updated.
Authors: Andrés Cabrera-León; Miguel Ángel Cantero-Braojos; Llenalia Garcia-Fernandez; Juan Antonio Guerra de Hoyos Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-11-12 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Elena Arroyo; Andrés Cabrera-León; Gemma Renart; Carme Saurina; Laura Serra Saurina; Antonio Daponte; Marc Saez Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-01-22 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Mairena Sánchez-López; María Jesús Pardo-Guijarro; David Gutiérrez-Díaz Del Campo; Pedro Silva; Maria Martínez-Andrés; Roberto Gulías-González; Ana Díez-Fernández; Pablo Franquelo-Morales; Vicente Martínez-Vizcaíno Journal: Trials Date: 2015-10-12 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Alberto José Cerrillo-Urbina; Antonio García-Hermoso; Vicente Martínez-Vizcaíno; María Jesús Pardo-Guijarro; Abel Ruiz-Hermosa; Mairena Sánchez-López Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2018-03-15 Impact factor: 2.125