Literature DB >> 22361503

Patients' experience of asthma control and clinical guidelines: perspectives from a qualitative study.

Katja Rudell1, Asha Hareendran, Nikki Bonner, Rob Arbuckle, Claire Burbridge, Linda Abetz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical guidelines consider the concept of 'asthma control' as the primary goal of asthma treatment. This study aimed to explore patients' views of concepts that are important for understanding and evaluating asthma control.
METHODS: Patients with mild to severe asthma in four countries completed the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) and discussed their experiences in focus groups. Clinicians evaluated patients' levels of asthma control based on Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines. Clinician- and questionnaire-based ratings of asthma control were compared. Thematic analysis was used to identify key concepts from focus group transcripts.
RESULTS: The sample consisted of 55 patients. Classification of asthma control, based on the ACQ, was consistent with clinician rating in 28 cases (51%). In focus groups, patients discussed concepts related to symptoms, asthma attacks (exacerbations), activity limitations, panic/fear, tiredness, sleep disturbances (nocturnal awakening and difficulty falling asleep), and rescue medication use when describing asthma control. Clinical guidelines also focus on symptoms, activity limitations, rescue medication use, and exacerbations but, in addition include lung function parameters. Guidelines do not take into account asthma-related panic/fear or tiredness and sleep disturbances beyond nocturnal awakening.
CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that patients' understanding of asthma control extends beyond the usual clinical manifestation of respiratory symptoms and lung function. This may have implications for clinical practice, for setting and achieving the goals of asthma control as well as for evaluation of treatments for asthma from the patients' perspective.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22361503     DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2011.08.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Respir Med        ISSN: 0954-6111            Impact factor:   3.415


  4 in total

1.  Patient and provider perspectives on uptake of a shared decision making intervention for asthma in primary care practices.

Authors:  Madelyn Welch; Thomas Ludden; Kathleen Mottus; Paul Bray; Lori Hendrickson; Jennifer Rees; Jacqueline Halladay; Hazel Tapp
Journal:  J Asthma       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 2.515

2.  'It's a powerful message': a qualitative study of Australian healthcare professionals' perceptions of asthma through the medium of drawings.

Authors:  Melissa Mei Yin Cheung; Bandana Saini; Lorraine Smith
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Guided asthma self-management or patient self-adjustment? Using patients' narratives to better understand adherence to asthma treatment.

Authors:  Biagina-Carla Farnesi; Francine M Ducharme; Lucie Blais; Johanne Collin; Kim L Lavoie; Simon L Bacon; Martha L McKinney; Sandra Peláez
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 2.711

4.  What types of dissemination of information occurred between researchers, providers and clinical staff while implementing an asthma shared decision-making intervention: a directed content analysis.

Authors:  Thomas Ludden; Lindsay Shade; Madelyn Welch; Jacqueline Halladay; Katrina E Donahue; Tamera Coyne-Beasley; Paul Bray; Hazel Tapp
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-03-08       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.