Literature DB >> 22361316

Risk factors for the development of retroprosthetic membranes with Boston keratoprosthesis type 1: multicenter study results.

Christopher J Rudnisky1, Michael W Belin, Amit Todani, Khalid Al-Arfaj, Jared D Ament, Brian J Zerbe, Joseph B Ciolino.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify possible risk factors for retroprosthetic membrane (RPM) development in a large, multicenter cohort of patients receiving a Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis.
DESIGN: Cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: The final analysis included 265 eyes of 265 patients who underwent implantation of a Boston keratoprosthesis type I device between January 2003 and July 2008 by 1 of 19 surgeons at 18 medical centers.
METHODS: Forms reporting preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters were prospectively collected and subsequently analyzed at a central data collection site. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the presence or absence of an RPM during the follow-up period.
RESULTS: The average age of patients was 63.3±19.1 years, 48.5% of the patients were female, and 52.5% of procedures were performed on the right eye. The mean follow-up time was 17.8±14.9 months. The majority (85.4%; n = 222) had undergone an average of 2.2±1.2 (range, 1-8) penetrating keratoplasties before keratoprosthesis implantation, and 38 eyes (14.6%) received a primary keratoprosthesis. The overall RPM formation rate was 31.7% (n = 84). The most significant risk factor for RPM development was infectious keratitis (as a surgical indication for keratoprosthesis surgery itself), resulting in a rate of RPM formation of 70.6%. As an independent risk factor, the hazard ratio (HR) of RPM development in these eyes was 3.20 (95% confidence interval, 1.66-6.17). Aniridia was also an independent risk factor for RPM development (HR, 3.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-8.89).
CONCLUSIONS: Formation of RPM is a common complication of keratoprosthesis surgery, occurring in approximately one-third of cases. Eyes at the highest risk of RPM development are those receiving corneal replacement for infectious keratitis and aniridia.
Copyright © 2012 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22361316      PMCID: PMC3343212          DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.11.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  11 in total

Review 1.  The Boston keratoprosthesis.

Authors:  Michael A Klufas; Kathryn A Colby
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol Clin       Date:  2010

2.  Keratoprosthesis: the Dohlman-Doane device.

Authors:  James V Aquavella; Ying Qian; Gregory J McCormick; Jayachandra Reddy Palakuru
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Results from the multicenter Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis Study.

Authors:  Brian L Zerbe; Michael W Belin; Joseph B Ciolino
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2006-07-26       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Retroprosthetic membranes in AlphaCor patients: risk factors and prevention.

Authors:  Celia R Hicks; Stephen Hamilton
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.651

5.  Glaucoma associated with keratoprosthesis.

Authors:  P A Netland; H Terada; C H Dohlman
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Keratoprosthesis: preoperative prognostic categories.

Authors:  F Yaghouti; M Nouri; J C Abad; W J Power; M G Doane; C H Dohlman
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.651

7.  Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis: the university of california davis experience.

Authors:  Jay C Bradley; Enrique Graue Hernandez; Ivan R Schwab; Mark J Mannis
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.651

8.  Characteristics of endophthalmitis in patients with the Boston keratoprosthesis.

Authors:  Robert E Fintelmann; Joseph I Maguire; Allen C Ho; Hall F Chew; Brandon D Ayres
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.651

9.  The Boston type I keratoprosthesis: improving outcomes and expanding indications.

Authors:  Anthony J Aldave; Khairidzan M Kamal; Rosalind C Vo; Fei Yu
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Boston keratoprosthesis outcomes and complications.

Authors:  Hall F Chew; Brandon D Ayres; Kristin M Hammersmith; Christopher J Rapuano; Peter R Laibson; Jonathan S Myers; Ya-Ping Jin; Elisabeth J Cohen
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.651

View more
  12 in total

1.  Artificial corneas versus donor corneas for repeat corneal transplants.

Authors:  Masako Chen; Sueko M Ng; Esen K Akpek; Sumayya Ahmad
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-05-13

2.  Anatomical survival and visual prognosis of Boston type I keratoprosthesis in challenging cases.

Authors:  Maria Fideliz de la Paz; Josef Stoiber; Valeria de Rezende Couto Nascimento; Juan Alvarez de Toledo; Orang Seyeddain; Wolfgang Hitzl; Günther Grabner; Rafael I Barraquer; Ralph Michael
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 3.  Artificial corneas versus donor corneas for repeat corneal transplants.

Authors:  Esen K Akpek; Majed Alkharashi; Frank S Hwang; Sueko M Ng; Kristina Lindsley
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-11-05

4.  Retention of the Boston keratoprosthesis type 1: multicenter study results.

Authors:  Joseph B Ciolino; Michael W Belin; Amit Todani; Khalid Al-Arfaj; Christopher J Rudnisky
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Donor Corneal Transplantation vs Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis in Patients with Previous Graft Failures: A Retrospective Single Center Study (An American Ophthalmological Society Thesis).

Authors:  Esen K Akpek; Sandra D Cassard; Karen Dunlap; Sarah Hahn; Pradeep Y Ramulu
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2015

Review 6.  Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis: Updated Perspectives.

Authors:  Manachai Nonpassopon; Muanploy Niparugs; Maria Soledad Cortina
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-04-29

Review 7.  Boston keratoprosthesis - Clinical outcomes with wider geographic use and expanding indications - A systematic review.

Authors:  Khalid Al Arfaj
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-02-10

Review 8.  Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis from patient selection through postoperative management: a review for the keratoprosthetic surgeon.

Authors:  Samantha L Williamson; M Soledad Cortina
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-03-14

9.  High MMP-9 Expression May Contribute to Retroprosthetic Membrane Formation after KPro Implantation in Rabbit Corneal Alkali Burn Model.

Authors:  Minghong Gao; Wei Sang; Fuying Liu; Hai Yu; Runhai Zhou; Michael Wellington Belin; Peter Zloty; Yingxin Chen
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 1.909

10.  Vision retention in early versus delayed glaucoma surgical intervention in patients with Boston Keratoprosthesis type 1.

Authors:  Mark Lin; Anand Bhatt; Asghar Haider; Grace Kim; Marjan Farid; Mason Schmutz; Sameh Mosaed
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.