Literature DB >> 22361300

Analysis of 13 cases of venous compromise in 178 radial forearm free flaps for intraoral reconstruction.

Y Liu1, Y F Zhao, J T Huang, Y Wu, L Jiang, G D Wang, W Li, X Q Chen, R H Shi.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyse the causes of venous compromise and flap failure in radial forearm free flap (RFFF) surgery for intraoral reconstruction. One hundred seventy-eight RFFF reconstructions were reviewed retrospectively for intraoral defects. Of the 13 flaps with venous obstruction, 9 flaps were salvaged, and 4 were lost, with a salvage rate of 69.2%. Eleven venous occlusions occurred within the first 72h. The main reasons for venous failure were mechanical obstruction or technical errors due to inadequate pedicle length and geometry, inadequate venous drainage, compression and kinking of the vein. The main cause of failure for oropharynx reconstruction was unrecognized vascular events due to the lack of reliable monitoring for buried flap. Oozing of dusky blood from the flap margin may be directly related to venous congestion in the early postoperative period and a late indication of a change in skin colour. In conclusion, a thorough operative plan, including carefully selected drainage vein for the flap and recipient vessels, adequate pedicle length and geometry, precise surgical technique, avoidance of haematoma, and expert monitoring of buried flaps may improve the success rate of RFFF transfer in intraoral reconstruction. Copyright Â
© 2012 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22361300     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2012.01.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  6 in total

1.  Reconstruction of dorsal hand and finger defects with reverse radial fasciocutaneous forearm flaps.

Authors:  Mehmet Ali Acar; Ali Güleç; Bahattin Kerem Aydin; Ömer Faruk Erkoçak; Mehmet Elmadag; Faik Türkmen
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-10-02

2.  One Versus 2 Venous Anastomoses in Free Flap Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jennifer L K Matthews; Noor Alolabi; Forough Farrokhyar; Sophocles H Voineskos
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 0.947

3.  Outcomes of Single Anastomoses for Superficial and Deep-System Venous Drainage of Radial Forearm Free Flaps.

Authors:  Mauricio Alejandro Moreno; Luke T Small; James Reed Gardner; Alexandrea H Kim; Emre Vural; Jumin Sunde
Journal:  OTO Open       Date:  2021-04-26

Review 4.  Single Superficial versus Dual Systems Venous Anastomoses in Radial Forearm Free Flap: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Shuang Bai; Zhong-Fei Xu; Wei-Yi Duan; Fa-Yu Liu; Dong-Hui Huang; Chang-Fu Sun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Clinical Application of a Pedicled Forearm Flap in the Reconstruction After Oral Cancer Resection.

Authors:  Xiaoqiang Zhao; Youmei Zhang; Shuai Fu; Changbin Zhang; Ming Li; Yong Wu
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.046

6.  The efficacy of the Cook-Swartz implantable Doppler in the detection of free-flap compromise: a systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Riaz A Agha; Buket Gundogan; Alexander J Fowler; Thomas W H Bragg; Dennis P Orgill
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.