Literature DB >> 22360983

Predictable closure of the abdominoperineal resection defect: a novel two-team approach.

Peter B Arnold1, Christopher J Lahr, Marc E Mitchell, James L Griffith, Nancy Salloum, Micah R Walker, Sana L Bhatti, Alan J Powers, John B McCraw.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Primary closure of the perineum at the time of abdominoperineal resection (APR) is seldom successful. Several factors are known to adversely affect healing, including neoadjuvant chemoradiation, tension, contamination, and fluid collection. This study evaluates a 2-team approach for resection and routine perineal closure in a single stage. STUDY
DESIGN: After tumor resection, the abdominal and perineal closures are performed simultaneously by 2 separate teams. A competent closure of the perineal defect is achieved with bilateral V-to-Y inferior gluteal artery perforator fasciocutaneous flaps (BIGAP) mobilizing buttock skin, fat, and gluteal muscle fascia for inset into the defect. No muscle is elevated with the flaps and no attempt is made to obliterate the deepest aspects of the pelvic defect.
RESULTS: Beginning in August 2010, 18 consecutive patients who underwent APR for distal rectal (n = 14) and anal carcinoma (n = 4) were included in the study. All patients had received neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy. Primary healing was achieved in 16 of 18 patients with a completely tension-free closure. One patient required debridement and secondary closure. Another patient had an unresectable tumor, which invaded the flap closure. Minor healing problems were seen in 7 patients.
CONCLUSIONS: BIGAP flaps provide sufficient tissue to predictably provide primary closure of the perineal defect. Perineal wound healing morbidity is dramatically reduced compared with primary simple closure of this defect. Early results indicate that this method of perineal closure offers a straightforward and predictable method that is comparable in efficacy to other methods using pedicled flaps for perineal closure.
Copyright © 2012 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22360983     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.12.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  4 in total

1.  The application of incisional negative pressure wound therapy for perineal wounds: A systematic review.

Authors:  Caitlin Cahill; Amanda Fowler; Lara J Williams
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  The management of perineal wounds.

Authors:  Ramesh K Sharma; Atul Parashar
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2012-05

3.  Combined Gluteus and Pudendal Thigh Flap Reconstruction of Vaginal Defects following Robotic Abdominoperineal Resection.

Authors:  Kasandra R Dassoulas; Traci L Hedrick; Chris A Campbell
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2017-09-19

4.  Pelvic/Perineal Reconstruction: Time to Consider the Anterolateral Thigh Flap as a First-line Option?

Authors:  David Perrault; Cindy Kin; Derrick C Wan; Natalie Kirilcuk; Andrew Shelton; Arash Momeni
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-04-24
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.