Literature DB >> 22360652

The potential of the internet.

Jamie J Coleman1, Sarah E McDowell.   

Abstract

The internet and the World Wide Web have changed the ways that we function. As technologies grow and adapt, there is a huge potential for the internet to affect drug research and development, as well as many other aspects of clinical pharmacology. We review some of the areas of interest to date and discuss some of the potential areas in which internet-based technology can be exploited. Information retrieval from the web by health-care professionals is common, and bringing evidence-based medicine to the bedside affects the care of patients. As a primary research tool the web can provide a vast array of information in generating new ideas or exploring previous research findings. This has facilitated systematic reviewing, for example. The content of the web has become a subject of research in its own right. The web is also widely used as a research facilitator, including enhancement of communication between collaborators, provision of online research tools (such as questionnaires, management of large scale multicentre trials, registration of clinical trials) and distribution of information. Problems include information overload, ignorance of early data that are not indexed in databases, difficulties in keeping web sites up to date and assessing the validity of information retrieved. Some web-based activities are viewed with suspicion, including analysis by pharmaceutical companies of drug information to facilitate direct-to-consumer advertising of novel pharmaceuticals. Use of these technologies will continue to expand in often unexpected ways. Clinical pharmacologists must embrace internet technology and include it as a key priority in their research agenda.
© 2012 The Authors. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology © 2012 The British Pharmacological Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22360652      PMCID: PMC3391527          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04245.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  24 in total

1.  Selected national pharmacovigilance websites: an analysis of contents.

Authors:  Charlotte I S Barker; John C C Talbot; Jeffrey K Aronson
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 2.  Informatics for neglected diseases collaborations.

Authors:  Frederic Bost; Robert T Jacobs; Paul Kowalczyk
Journal:  Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel       Date:  2010-05

3.  Innovations for the future of pharmacovigilance.

Authors:  June S Almenoff
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  How quickly do systematic reviews go out of date? A survival analysis.

Authors:  Kaveh G Shojania; Margaret Sampson; Mohammed T Ansari; Jun Ji; Steve Doucette; David Moher
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-07-16       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Provision of information on regulatory authorities' websites.

Authors:  A Vitry; J Lexchin; L Sasich; T Dupin-Spriet; T Reed; V Bertele; S Garattini; L Toop; E Hurley
Journal:  Intern Med J       Date:  2008-03-11       Impact factor: 2.048

6.  Drug related problems with Antiparkinsonian agents: consumer Internet reports versus published data.

Authors:  Sabrina Schröder; York Francis Zöllner; Marion Schaefer
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.890

7.  Drug discovery in the era of Facebook--new tools for scientific networking.

Authors:  David S Bailey; Edward D Zanders
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 7.851

8.  The automation of clinical trial serious adverse event reporting workflow.

Authors:  Jack W London; Karl J Smalley; Kyle Conner; J Bruce Smith
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2009-09-08       Impact factor: 2.486

9.  Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Indian Med Assoc       Date:  2009-06

10.  Identifying systematic reviews of the adverse effects of health care interventions.

Authors:  Su Golder; Heather M McIntosh; Yoon Loke
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2006-05-08       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of the use of online questionnaires of older adults.

Authors:  Meegan L Remillard; Kathleen M Mazor; Sarah L Cutrona; Jerry H Gurwitz; Jennifer Tjia
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 5.562

2.  Scientific and ethical features of English-language online tests for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Julie M Robillard; Judy Illes; Marcel Arcand; B Lynn Beattie; Sherri Hayden; Peter Lawrence; Joanna McGrenere; Peter B Reiner; Dana Wittenberg; Claudia Jacova
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (Amst)       Date:  2015-07-02

3.  Web-Based Study of Risk Factors for Pain Exacerbation in Osteoarthritis of the Knee (SPARK-Web): Design and Rationale.

Authors:  Joanna Makovey; Ben Metcalf; Yuqing Zhang; Jian Sheng Chen; Kim Bennell; Lyn March; David J Hunter
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2015-07-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.