Literature DB >> 22360410

Foaming and foam stability for mixed polymer-surfactant solutions: effects of surfactant type and polymer charge.

R Petkova1, S Tcholakova, N D Denkov.   

Abstract

Solutions of surfactant-polymer mixtures often exhibit different foaming properties, compared to the solutions of the individual components, due to the strong tendency for formation of polymer-surfactant complexes in the bulk and on the surface of the mixed solutions. A generally shared view in the literature is that electrostatic interactions govern the formation of these complexes, for example between anionic surfactants and cationic polymers. In this study we combine foam tests with model experiments to evaluate and explain the effect of several polymer-surfactant mixtures on the foaminess and foam stability of the respective solutions. Anionic, cationic, and nonionic surfactants (SDS, C(12)TAB, and C(12)EO(23)) were studied to clarify the role of surfactant charge. Highly hydrophilic cationic and nonionic polymers (polyvinylamine and polyvinylformamide, respectivey) were chosen to eliminate the (more trivial) effect of direct hydrophobic interactions between the surfactant tails and the hydrophobic regions on the polymer chains. Our experiments showed clearly that the presence of opposite charges is not a necessary condition for boosting the foaminess and foam stability in the surfactant-polymer mixtures studied. Clear foam boosting (synergistic) effects were observed in the mixtures of cationic surfactant and cationic polymer, cationic surfactant and nonionic polymer, and anionic surfactant and nonionic polymer. The mixtures of anionic surfactant and cationic polymer showed improved foam stability, however, the foaminess was strongly reduced, as compared to the surfactant solutions without polymer. No significant synergistic or antagonistic effects were observed for the mixture of nonionic surfactant (with low critical micelle concentration) and nonionic polymer. The results from the model experiments allowed us to explain the observed trends by the different adsorption dynamics and complex formation pattern in the systems studied.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22360410     DOI: 10.1021/la3003096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langmuir        ISSN: 0743-7463            Impact factor:   3.882


  6 in total

1.  Friction Dynamics of Foams under Nonlinear Motion.

Authors:  Kei Kikuchi; Akari Iwasawa; Mitsuki Omori; Hiroyuki Mayama; Yoshimune Nonomura
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-05-03

2.  Efficient self-emulsification via cooling-heating cycles.

Authors:  Slavka Tcholakova; Zhulieta Valkova; Diana Cholakova; Zahari Vinarov; Ivan Lesov; Nikolai Denkov; Stoyan K Smoukov
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  Structure of Polystyrenesulfonate/Surfactant Mixtures at Air-Water Interfaces and Their Role as Building Blocks for Macroscopic Foam.

Authors:  Felix Schulze-Zachau; Björn Braunschweig
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 3.882

Review 4.  Physiological and Pharmaceutical Considerations for Rectal Drug Formulations.

Authors:  Susan Hua
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 5.810

5.  A Novel Supercritical CO2 Foam System Stabilized With a Mixture of Zwitterionic Surfactant and Silica Nanoparticles for Enhanced Oil Recovery.

Authors:  Weitao Li; Falin Wei; Chunming Xiong; Jian Ouyang; Liming Shao; Mingli Dai; Pingde Liu; Dongxing Du
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 5.221

Review 6.  Spectral Properties of Foams and Emulsions.

Authors:  Andra Dinache; Mihail-Lucian Pascu; Adriana Smarandache
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 4.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.