| Literature DB >> 22359537 |
Jean Kyung Paik1, Ji Young Kim, Oh Yoen Kim, Yonghee Lee, Tae-Sook Jeong, Gary Sweeney, Yangsoo Jang, Jong Ho Lee.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the association of lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A(2) (Lp-PLA(2)) activity in circulation and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) with inflammatory and oxidative stress markers in nonobese women and according to menopausal status. Lp-PLA(2) activity, a marker for cardiovascular risk is associated with inflammation and oxidative stress. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22359537 PMCID: PMC3281008 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029675
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Clinical characteristics of the study participants according to menopausal status.
| Premenopausal women (n = 96) | Postmenopausal women (n = 80) | P0 | P1 | |||||
| Age (yr) | 39.7 | ± | 9.25 | 53.0 | ± | 4.05 | <0.001 | - |
| Years since menopause | - | 3.49 | ± | 3.87 | - | - | ||
| Body Mass Index (kg/m2) | 21.9 | ± | 2.84 | 22.8 | ± | 2.27 | 0.024 | - |
| Cigarette smoker, n (%) | 1 (1.0) | 2 (2.5) | 0.592 | - | ||||
| Alcohol drinker, n (%) | 62 (64.6) | 37 (46.3) | 0.022 | - | ||||
| Waist hip ratio | 0.84 | ± | 0.05 | 0.88 | ± | 0.05 | <0.001 | 0.042 |
| Systolic BP (mmHg) | 109.3 | ± | 14.2 | 118.6 | ± | 12.0 | <0.001 | 0.614 |
| Diastolic BP (mmHg) | 74.2 | ± | 10.6 | 76.0 | ± | 8.75 | 0.238 | 0.592 |
| Triglyceride (mg/dL) | 90.7 | ± | 41.6 | 98.2 | ± | 45.4 | 0.489 | 0.340 |
| Total-cholesterol (mg/dL) | 182.6 | ± | 26.4 | 210.3 | ± | 32.7 | <0.001 | 0.004 |
| LDL-cholesterol (mg/dL) | 109.1 | ± | 23.4 | 132.5 | ± | 28.6 | <0.001 | 0.006 |
| HDL-cholesterol (mg/dL) | 55.4 | ± | 12.8 | 58.1 | ± | 14.1 | 0.185 | 0.145 |
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 85.5 | ± | 7.98 | 92.1 | ± | 12.3 | <0.001 | 0.016 |
| Free fatty acid (uEq/L) | 407.1 | ± | 191.8 | 409.5 | ± | 158.2 | 0.488 | 0.548 |
| hs-CRP (mg/dL) | 0.51 | ± | 0.75 | 0.36 | ± | 0.92 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Serum FSH (IU/L) | 10.6 | ± | 17.9 | 75.2 | ± | 28.9 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Serum 17ß-estradiol (pg/mL) | 134.6 | ± | 126.9 | 18.2 | ± | 24.8 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| White blood cells (×109/L) | 4.94 | ± | 1.01 | 4.98 | ± | 1.15 | 0.785 | 0.948 |
Means ± SD. Tested by independent t-test or general linear model with the adjustment.
tested by log-transformed P0: unadjusted, P1: adjusted for age, BMI, and alcohol consumption.
Oxidative stress markers, cytokines, and Lp-PLA2 activity according to menopausal status.
| Premenopausal women (n = 96) | Postmenopausal women (n = 80) | P0 | P1 | |||||
| Plasma oxidized LDL(U/L) | 40.9 | ± | 11.4 | 56.7 | ± | 23.8 | <0.001 | 0.031 |
| Urinary 8-epi-PGF2α (pg/mg creatinine) | 1079.1 | ± | 281.6 | 1199.8 | ± | 461.5 | 0.179 | 0.400 |
| Serum IL-6 (pg/mL) | 1.94 | ± | 1.28 | 4.53 | ± | 5.27 | <0.001 | 0.005 |
| Serum TNF-α (pg/mL) | 5.88 | ± | 7.03 | 6.64 | ± | 10.6 | 0.795 | 0.213 |
| Serum IL-1ß (pg/mL) | 0.70 | ± | 1.17 | 0.77 | ± | 1.53 | 0.929 | 0.961 |
| Lp-PLA2 activity (nmol/mL/min) | 28.3 | ± | 9.42 | 30.6 | ± | 7.77 | 0.084 | 0.447 |
| Nonstimulated PBMC | ||||||||
| IL-6 (pg/mL) | 786.1 | ± | 3107.9 | 1409.0 | ± | 6504.8 | <0.001 | 0.027 |
| TNF-α (pg/mL) | 169.3 | ± | 803.4 | 626.9 | ± | 2044.3 | <0.001 | 0.008 |
| IL-1ß (pg/mL) | 14.4 | ± | 42.4 | 119.7 | ± | 351.2 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Lp-PLA2 activity (nmol/mL/min) | 2.01 | ± | 0.55 | 2.11 | ± | 0.61 | 0.265 | 0.621 |
Mean ± SD. Tested by independent t-test or general linear model with the adjustment.
tested by log-transformed. P0: unadjusted, P1: adjusted for age, BMI and alcohol consumption.
Correlations among oxidative stress markers, cytokines, and Lp-PLA2 activity in the circulation and in PBMCs according to menopausal status.
| Premenopausal women (n = 96) | Postmenopausal women (n = 80) | |||||||||||
| Plasmaox-LDL | Plasma Lp-PLA2 activity | Nonstimulated PBMC Lp-PLA2 | Plasma ox-LDL | Plasma Lp-PLA2 activity | Nonstimulated PBMC Lp-PLA2 | |||||||
| r0 | r1 | r0 | r1 | r0 | r1 | r0 | r1 | r0 | r1 | r0 | r1 | |
| Plasma ox- LDL(U/L) | - | - | 0.244 | 0.247 | 0.022 | 0.006 | - | - | 0.390 | 0.394 | 0.215 | 0.154 |
| Serum IL-6 (pg/mL) | 0.042 | 0.051 | −0.150 | −0.154 | −0.020 | −0.032 | 0.171 | 0.143 | 0.022 | 0.016 | 0.019 | −0.017 |
| Serum TNF-α (pg/mL) | −0.037 | −0.016 | −0.178 | −0.202 | 0.101 | 0.068 | 0.090 | 0.031 | −0.022 | −0.018 | 0.030 | −0.008 |
| Serum IL-1ß (pg/mL) | −0.018 | −0.020 | 0.042 | 0.033 | 0.073 | 0.042 | −0.061 | −0.062 | −0.050 | −0.046 | −0.022 | −0.048 |
| Lp-PLA2 activity (nmol/mL/min) | 0.244 | 0.247 | - | - | 0.427 | 0.422 | 0.390 | 0.394 | - | - | 0.380 | 0.374 |
| Nonstimulated PBMCs | ||||||||||||
| IL-6 (pg/mL) | 0.058 | 0.042 | 0.326 | 0.318 | 0.363 | 0.353 | 0.230 | 0.222 | 0.051 | 0.073 | 0.127 | 0.121 |
| TNF-α (pg/mL) | 0.106 | 0.072 | 0.209 | 0.202 | 0.205 | 0.198 | 0.308 | 0.307 | 0.171 | 0.208 | 0.032 | 0.022 |
| IL-1ß (pg/mL) | 0.056 | 0.035 | 0.277 | 0.269 | 0.272 | 0.255 | 0.304 | 0.301 | 0.220 | 0.251 | 0.080 | 0.067 |
| Lp-PLA2 activity (nmol/mL/min) | 0.022 | 0.006 | 0.427 | 0.422 | - | - | 0.215 | 0.154 | 0.380 | 0.374 | - | - |
Pearson and partial correlation analysis, r0: unadjusted, r1: adjusted for age, BMI, and alcohol consumption,
*P<0.05,
**P<0.01,
***P<0.001,
tested by log-transformed.
Figure 1Relationship between Lp-PLA2 activity from PBMCs or plasma ox-LDL and plasma Lp-PLA2 activity according to plasma ox-LDL (below or above the median level of 48.715 U/L) in postmenopausal women.
§tested by log-transformed. Tested by Pearson correlation (r) or partial correlation analysis (r). r 0: correlation coefficient, unadjusted. r: correlation coefficient after adjusted for age, BMI, and alcohol consumption. r: correlation coefficient after adjusted for age, BMI, alcohol consumption, and LDL-cholesterol.
Figure 2Lp-PLA2 activity in plasma and supernatants from nonstimulated PBMC cultures and oxidative stress markers according to menopausal status and plasma ox-LDL levels (below or above the median level of 48.715 U/L).
Data are means ± SD. §tested by log-transformed. P0: unadjusted, tested by one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni method P1: adjusted for BMI and alcohol consumption, tested by general linear model (GLM) analysis. P2: adjusted for age, BMI, and alcohol consumption, tested by GLM analysis.