Literature DB >> 22359338

On the inter-instrument and the inter-laboratory transferability of a tandem mass spectral reference library. 3. Focus on ion trap and upfront CID.

Herbert Oberacher1, Florian Pitterl, Eleni Siapi, Barry R Steele, Thomas Letzel, Sylvia Grosse, Bernhard Poschner, Franco Tagliaro, Rossella Gottardo, Silvi A Chacko, Jonathan L Josephs.   

Abstract

Mass spectral libraries represent versatile tools for the identification of small bioorganic molecules. Libraries based on electron impact spectra are rated robust and transferable. Tandem mass spectral libraries are often considered to work properly only on the instrument that has been used to build the library. An exception from that rule is the 'Wiley Registry of Tandem Mass Spectral Data, MSforID'. In various studies with data sets from different kinds of tandem mass spectrometric instruments, the outstanding sensitivity and robustness of this tandem mass spectral library search approach was demonstrated. The instrumental platforms tested, however, mainly included various tandem-in-space instruments. Herein, the results of a multicenter study with a focus on upfront and tandem-in-time fragmentation are presented. Five laboratories participated and provided fragment ion mass spectra from the following types of mass spectrometers: time-of-flight (TOF), quadrupole-hexapole-TOF, linear ion trap (LIT), 3-D ion trap and LIT-Orbitrap. A total number of 1231 fragment ion mass spectra were collected from 20 test compounds (amiloride, buphenin, cinchocaine, cyclizine, desipramine, dihydroergotamine, dyxirazine, dosulepin, ergotamine, ethambutol, etofylline, mefruside, metoclopramide, phenazone, phentermine, phenytoin, sulfamethoxazole, sulfamoxole, sulthiame and tetracycline) on seven electrospray ionization instruments using 18 different instrumental configurations for fragmentation. For 1222 spectra (99.3%), the correct compound was retrieved as the best matching compound. Classified matches (matches with 'relative average match probability' >40.0) were obtained for 1207 spectra (98.1%). This high percentage of correct identifications clearly supports the hypothesis that the tandem mass spectral library approach tested is a robust and universal identification tool.
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22359338     DOI: 10.1002/jms.2961

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mass Spectrom        ISSN: 1076-5174            Impact factor:   1.982


  7 in total

1.  Post-acquisition data processing for the screening of transformation products of different organic contaminants. Two-year monitoring of river water using LC-ESI-QTOF-MS and GCxGC-EI-TOF-MS.

Authors:  S Herrera López; M M Ulaszewska; M D Hernando; M J Martínez Bueno; M J Gómez; A R Fernández-Alba
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-06-22       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  Usage and limitations of liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) in clinical routine laboratories.

Authors:  Christoph Seger
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2012-11-06

3.  Analytical Validation of a Portable Mass Spectrometer Featuring Interchangeable, Ambient Ionization Sources for High Throughput Forensic Evidence Screening.

Authors:  Zachary E Lawton; Angelica Traub; William L Fatigante; Jose Mancias; Adam E O'Leary; Seth E Hall; Jamie R Wieland; Herbert Oberacher; Michael C Gizzi; Christopher C Mulligan
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 3.109

Review 4.  Identification of small molecules using accurate mass MS/MS search.

Authors:  Tobias Kind; Hiroshi Tsugawa; Tomas Cajka; Yan Ma; Zijuan Lai; Sajjan S Mehta; Gert Wohlgemuth; Dinesh Kumar Barupal; Megan R Showalter; Masanori Arita; Oliver Fiehn
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 10.946

Review 5.  The importance of mass spectrometric dereplication in fungal secondary metabolite analysis.

Authors:  Kristian F Nielsen; Thomas O Larsen
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Applying Tandem Mass Spectral Libraries for Solving the Critical Assessment of Small Molecule Identification (CASMI) LC/MS Challenge 2012.

Authors:  Herbert Oberacher
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2013-04-26

7.  How to perform spectrum-based LC-HR-MS screening for more than 1,000 NPS with HighResNPS consensus fragment ions.

Authors:  Anders Davidsen; Marie Mardal; Kristian Linnet; Petur Weihe Dalsgaard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.