Literature DB >> 22359180

On scales of measurement in Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) and beyond: where Smitty went wrong.

Domenic V Cicchetti1.   

Abstract

The author examined critically three beliefs of S.S. Stevens pertaining to his quadripartite system of scales of measurement: (1) There are four scales of measurement in common usage (2) These scales and the scientific disciplines that use them can be incrementally graded for levels of reliability and validity or accuracy such that: Nominal scale variables produce the lowest levels of reliability and accuracy; with successively improving levels for Ordinal, Equal Interval, and Equal Ratio scales; and (3) The scale upon which a variable is measured determines the type of statistical test that one is permitted to apply. It was shown that each of the three beliefs is fundamentally flawed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 22359180     DOI: 10.1007/s10803-012-1486-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord        ISSN: 0162-3257


  10 in total

1.  Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences.

Authors:  C C Preston; A M Colman
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2000-03

2.  Assessing inter-rater reliability for rating scales: resolving some basic issues.

Authors:  D V Cicchetti
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 9.319

3.  Measuring agreement between two judges on the presence or absence of a trait.

Authors:  J L Fleiss
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Rating scales, scales of measurement, issues of reliability: resolving some critical issues for clinicians and researchers.

Authors:  Domenic Cicchetti; Richard Bronen; Susan Spencer; Sheryl Haut; Anne Berg; Patricia Oliver; Peter Tyrer
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.254

5.  On the Theory of Scales of Measurement.

Authors:  S S Stevens
Journal:  Science       Date:  1946-06-07       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit.

Authors:  J Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1968-10       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Coming to terms with the terms of risk.

Authors:  H C Kraemer; A E Kazdin; D R Offord; R C Kessler; P S Jensen; D J Kupfer
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1997-04

8.  Measurement, statistics, and the schemapiric view. Like the faces of Janus, science looks two ways--toward schematics and empirics.

Authors:  S S Stevens
Journal:  Science       Date:  1968-08-30       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  The intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of reliability.

Authors:  J J Bartko
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  1966-08

10.  Client voice quality and expressive style as indexes of productive psychotherapy.

Authors:  L N Rice; A K Wagstaff
Journal:  J Consult Psychol       Date:  1967-12
  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  A Monte Carlo-Based Bayesian Approach for Measuring Agreement in a Qualitative Scale.

Authors:  Fernando Calle-Alonso; Carlos Javier Pérez Sánchez
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2014-11-05
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.