OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and predictive features of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/ computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) and CT in lymph node (LN) staging of T1 non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) manifesting as subsolid nodules. METHODS: From January 2005 to May 2011, 160 patients with pathologically proven T1 subsolid NSCLCs with LN staging were included in this study. Diagnostic accuracies of FDG-PET/CT and CT for LN staging were evaluated. Maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax) and CT features of primary tumours were evaluated to investigate predictive factors for LN metastasis. RESULTS: LN metastases were found in nine of the 160 patients (5.6%). No LN metastasis was present in patients with a solid proportion ≤50%. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of FDG-PET/CT for LN staging on a per-patient basis were 11.1%, 86.1% and 81.9%; those of CT were 11.1%, 96.7% and 91.9%. Among patients with a solid proportion >50%, there were significant differences in SUVmax, solid portion size, solid proportion and lesion location between patients with and without LN metastasis. Multivariate analysis revealed that higher SUVmax, a larger solid proportion and central location were independent predictors of LN metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: FDG-PET/CT adds little value to CT in the lymph node staging of T1 subsolid NSCLCs. KEY POINTS: Lymph node (LN) metastases are important in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). • Positron emission tomography (PET) helps to stage solid NSCLCs. • FDG-PET/CT adds little to the LN staging of T1 subsolid NSCLCs. • No LN metastasis in patients with a solid proportion ≤50%. • LN metastasis is more common in solid and/or centrally sited tumours.
OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and predictive features of F-18fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/ computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) and CT in lymph node (LN) staging of T1 non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) manifesting as subsolid nodules. METHODS: From January 2005 to May 2011, 160 patients with pathologically proven T1 subsolid NSCLCs with LN staging were included in this study. Diagnostic accuracies of FDG-PET/CT and CT for LN staging were evaluated. Maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax) and CT features of primary tumours were evaluated to investigate predictive factors for LN metastasis. RESULTS: LN metastases were found in nine of the 160 patients (5.6%). No LN metastasis was present in patients with a solid proportion ≤50%. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of FDG-PET/CT for LN staging on a per-patient basis were 11.1%, 86.1% and 81.9%; those of CT were 11.1%, 96.7% and 91.9%. Among patients with a solid proportion >50%, there were significant differences in SUVmax, solid portion size, solid proportion and lesion location between patients with and without LN metastasis. Multivariate analysis revealed that higher SUVmax, a larger solid proportion and central location were independent predictors of LN metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: FDG-PET/CT adds little value to CT in the lymph node staging of T1 subsolid NSCLCs. KEY POINTS: Lymph node (LN) metastases are important in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). • Positron emission tomography (PET) helps to stage solid NSCLCs. • FDG-PET/CT adds little to the LN staging of T1 subsolid NSCLCs. • No LN metastasis in patients with a solid proportion ≤50%. • LN metastasis is more common in solid and/or centrally sited tumours.
Authors: Didier Lardinois; Walter Weder; Thomas F Hany; Ehab M Kamel; Stephan Korom; Burkhardt Seifert; Gustav K von Schulthess; Hans C Steinert Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-06-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Eun Ju Chun; Hyun Ju Lee; Won Jun Kang; Kwang Gi Kim; Jin Mo Goo; Chang Min Park; Chang Hyun Lee Journal: Lung Cancer Date: 2009-01-19 Impact factor: 5.705
Authors: Hyun Ju Lee; Jin Mo Goo; Chang Hyun Lee; Chul-Gyu Yoo; Young Tae Kim; Jung-Gi Im Journal: Korean J Radiol Date: 2007 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 3.500
Authors: Kyoungjune Pak; Keunyoung Kim; Mi-Hyun Kim; Jung Seop Eom; Min Ki Lee; Jeong Su Cho; Yun Seong Kim; Bum Soo Kim; Seong Jang Kim; In Joo Kim Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-02-27 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jun Yeun Cho; Cho Sun Leem; Youlim Kim; Eun Sun Kim; Sang Hoon Lee; Yeon Joo Lee; Jong Sun Park; Young-Jae Cho; Jae Ho Lee; Choon-Taek Lee; Ho Il Yoon Journal: BMC Pulm Med Date: 2018-09-10 Impact factor: 3.317