| Literature DB >> 22358057 |
Caroline G McPhee, F Jason Duncan, Kathleen A Silva, Lloyd E King, Harm Hogenesch, Derry C Roopenian, Helen B Everts, John P Sundberg.
Abstract
Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22358057 PMCID: PMC3352958 DOI: 10.1038/jid.2012.17
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Invest Dermatol ISSN: 0022-202X Impact factor: 8.551
Figure 1CXCL9 protein levels are significantly increased in mice with AA
An ELISA against CXCL9 was performed on dorsolumbar skin from mice receiving a graft from an AA mouse or their own skin rotated 180° (sham) 5, 10, 15, or 20 weeks post grafting. These values were natural log transformed and analyzed by univariate analysis of variance using a full factorial model in SPSS, v19. Bars indicate means +/− SE, n=8–10. * = Mice receiving the AA graft had significantly more CXCL9 (p < 0.001) than those mice receiving the sham graft at all time points shown. t5 = CXCL9 is significantly increased in week 20 AA mice compared to week 5 AA mice (p < 0.01).
Figure 2Transcripts of the CXCR3 axis as well as MHC class I associated molecules are significantly increased in mice with AA
(A) Gene expression analysis using Affymetrix microarrays of C3H/HeJ mice at 5, 10, and 20 weeks post engraftment compared with sham control as well as C3H/HeJ mice spontaneously developing AA. Values shown are significant by ANOVA analysis with q value < 0.05. Values are expressed as Log2. n = 3 for each group. (B) Gene expression analysis using quantitative RT PCR from mice shown in (A). Values shown are significant (p < 0.05) as determined by GPR analysis. Values are expressed as Log2. n = 3 for each group.