Literature DB >> 22357999

CT-based determination of maximum ureteral stone area: a predictor of spontaneous passage.

Shadpour Demehri1, Michael L Steigner, Aaron D Sodickson, E Andres Houseman, Frank J Rybicki, Stuart G Silverman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that the maximum axial area of ureteral stones is a more accurate predictor of spontaneous passage than the maximum axial diameter.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study retrospectively reviewed 211 consecutive emergency department patients (mean age, 48.8 years; age range, 18-88 years) with acute flank pain due to ureteral stones diagnosed using unenhanced CT. Measurements of maximum atrial area were obtained using fixed (FTM) and variable (VTM) threshold methods. For the FTM, stones were segmented using an attenuation threshold of 130 HU. For the VTM, stones were segmented using an attenuation threshold determined by one half of individual stone attenuation. Measurements of maximum atrial diameter were obtained using soft-tissue and bone window settings. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to compare the accuracy of maximum atrial area with maximum atrial diameter measurements for predicting spontaneous passage.
RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients (27%) required urologic intervention. The areas under the ROC curve (AUC) of maximum atrial area using FTM (0.83, p = 0.013) and VTM (0.84, p = 0.004) were larger than the AUC (0.8, p = 0.4) for maximum atrial diameter using bone window settings or AUC (0.79) for maximum atrial iameter using soft-tissue window settings. For stones with maximum atrial diameter (in soft-tissue window settings) > 5 mm and ≤ 10 mm, the accuracy of maximum atrial area using VTM (AUC = 0.75) and FTM (AUC = 0.74) was superior to the accuracy of maximum atrial diameter in soft-tissue (AUC = 0.67) and bone (AUC = 0.69) window settings (p < 0.05) in predicting spontaneous passage.
CONCLUSION: Determination of the maximum axial area may improve the accuracy in predicting spontaneous passage of ureteral stones, particularly those between 5 and 10 mm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22357999     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.11.7276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  8 in total

1.  In-vitro comparison of different slice thicknesses and kernel settings for measurement of urinary stone size by computed tomography.

Authors:  Roland Umbach; Jochen-Klaus Müller; Gunnar Wendt-Nordahl; Thomas Knoll; Jan Peter Jessen
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 2.  Role of conservative management of stones.

Authors:  Kesavapillai Subramonian; Hector Sandoval Barba; Maitrey Darrad
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2020-11-01

3.  Does volume matter? Incorporating estimated stone volume in a nomogram to predict ureteral stone passage.

Authors:  Nassib Abou Heidar; Muhieddine Labban; David-Dan Nguyen; Adnan El-Achkar; Mazen Mansour; Naeem Bhojani; Rami Nasr
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Frequency and risk factors for antegrade ureteral stone migration after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Hector S Barba; Christian Isaac Villeda-Sandoval; Carlos E Mendez-Probst
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2020-08-29

5.  Prediction of spontaneous ureteral stone passage: Automated 3D-measurements perform equal to radiologists, and linear measurements equal to volumetric.

Authors:  Johan Jendeberg; Håkan Geijer; Muhammed Alshamari; Mats Lidén
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Size matters: The width and location of a ureteral stone accurately predict the chance of spontaneous passage.

Authors:  Johan Jendeberg; Håkan Geijer; Muhammed Alshamari; Bartosz Cierzniak; Mats Lidén
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Can serum procalcitonin levels be useful in predicting spontaneous ureteral stone passage?

Authors:  Nusret Can Cilesiz; Arif Ozkan; Arif Kalkanli; Ali Eroglu; Cem Tuğrul Gezmis; Berkan Simsek; Burak Arslan
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2020-04-19       Impact factor: 2.264

8.  Clinical and Radiological Predictors of Early Intervention in Acute Ureteral Colic.

Authors:  Faris Abushamma; Mahfouz Ktaifan; Abdoh Abdallah; Mohammad Alkarajeh; Mosab Maree; Ahmed Awadghanem; Ahmad Jaradat; Amir Aghbar; Sa'ed H Zyoud; Francis X Keeley
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2021-07-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.