| Literature DB >> 22357172 |
Sharon K Sagiv1, Sally W Thurston, David C Bellinger, Larisa M Altshul, Susan A Korrick.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We previously reported associations between organochlorines and behaviors related to attention deficit hyperactivity disorder among boys and girls at 8 years of age using a teacher's rating scale for a birth cohort in New Bedford, Massachusetts (USA).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22357172 PMCID: PMC3385436 DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1104372
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Health Perspect ISSN: 0091-6765 Impact factor: 9.031
Summary statistics for cord serum organochlorines and CPT and WISC-III outcomes for children with both exposure and outcome measures born in New Bedford, 1993–1998.
| Exposure or outcome measure | n | Mean ± SD | Median (range) | IQR | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exposure statistics | ||||||||
| ΣPCB4 (ng/g) | 584 | 0.25 ± 0.26 | 0.19 (0.01–2.59) | 0.19 | ||||
| PCB TEQ (pg/g lipid) | 584 | 1.41 ± 1.97 | 0.89 (0.00–26.56) | 1.00 | ||||
| p,p´-DDE (ng/g) | 584 | 0.50 ± 1.03 | 0.31 (0.00–14.93) | 0.27 | ||||
| Outcome statistics | ||||||||
| CPT (n = 578) | ||||||||
| Mean reaction time (msec) | 578 | 646.7 ± 65.0 | 645.4 (487.8–861.7) | |||||
| Reaction time variability (msec) | 578 | 127.7 ± 31.7 | 125.9 (53.2–393.9) | |||||
| Total errors of omission | 578 | 2.3 ± 2.7 | 1.0 (0.0–17.0) | |||||
| Total errors of commission | 578 | 2.4 ± 2.2 | 2.0 (0.0–14.0) | |||||
| WISC-III, age-standardized scores (n = 584) | ||||||||
| Processing Speed | 584 | 104.5 ± 14.8 | 104.0 (58.0–146.0) | |||||
| Freedom from Distractibility | 583 | 98.1 ± 13.1 | 98.0 (50.0–134.0) |
Associations between ΣPCB4, PCB TEQ, and p,p´-DDE and CPT and WISC-III outcomes for all children and by sex for 8-year-old children born in New Bedford, 1993–1998 [IQRa (95% CI)].
| Unadjusted model (all children) | Adjusted modelb | Sex interaction p-valuec | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome measure | All children | Females | Males | |||||||
| CPT | n = 578 | n = 512 | n = 254 | n = 258 | ||||||
| Reaction time (β) | ||||||||||
| ΣPCB4 | –3.2 (–7.0, 0.6) | –3.1 (–7.3, 1.0) | –5.8 (–10.5, –1.0) | 3.5 (–3.6, 10.5) | 0.02 | |||||
| PCB TEQ | –2.8 (–5.4, –0.1) | –2.1 (–4.9, 0.7) | –3.4 (–6.5, –0.4) | 3.0 (–2.6, 8.6) | 0.04 | |||||
| p,p´-DDE | –0.7 (–2.0, 0.7) | –0.6 (–1.9, 0.8) | –1.5 (–3.0, 0.1) | 1.8 (–0.7, 4.2) | 0.03 | |||||
| Reaction time variability (β) | ||||||||||
| ΣPCB4 | –0.5 (–2.3, 1.4) | 0.3 (–1.6, 2.2) | –0.7 (–2.9, 1.4) | 2.9 (–0.3, 6.2) | 0.05 | |||||
| PCB TEQ | –0.4 (–1.7, 0.9) | 0.4 (–0.9, 1.7) | –0.4 (–1.8, 1.0) | 3.3 (0.7, 5.8) | 0.01 | |||||
| p,p´-DDE | –0.2 (–0.9, 0.4) | –0.1 (–0.7, 0.6) | –0.4 (–1.1, 0.3) | 0.8 (–0.4, 1.9) | 0.09 | |||||
| Errors of omission (rate ratio) | ||||||||||
| ΣPCB4 | 1.00 (0.93, 1.07) | 1.01 (0.93, 1.10) | 0.95 (0.86, 1.05) | 1.11 (0.98, 1.27) | 0.04 | |||||
| PCB TEQ | 1.00 (0.95, 1.06) | 1.02 (0.97, 1.08) | 0.98 (0.92, 1.05) | 1.12 (1.01, 1.25) | 0.03 | |||||
| p,p´-DDE | 1.00 (0.97, 1.03) | 1.00 (0.97, 1.03) | 0.97 (0.94, 1.01) | 1.05 (0.99, 1.10) | 0.02 | |||||
| Errors of commission (rate ratio) | ||||||||||
| ΣPCB4 | 1.00 (0.95, 1.06) | 1.01 (0.95, 1.07) | 1.00 (0.93, 1.08) | 1.03 (0.93, 1.13) | 0.68 | |||||
| PCB TEQ | 1.00 (0.97, 1.04) | 1.02 (0.98, 1.06) | 1.01 (0.97, 1.06) | 1.04 (0.96, 1.12) | 0.63 | |||||
| p,p´-DDE | 1.00 (0.98, 1.02) | 1.01 (0.99, 1.03) | 1.00 (0.98, 1.02) | 1.02 (0.99, 1.06) | 0.23 | |||||
| WISC-III | n = 584 | n = 535 | n = 264 | n = 271 | ||||||
| Processing Speed (β) | ||||||||||
| ΣPCB4 | 0.3 (–0.6, 1.2) | –0.5 (–1.5, 0.4) | 0.0 (–1.0, 1.1) | –2.0 (–3.5, –0.4) | 0.03 | |||||
| PCB TEQ | 0.3 (–0.3, 0.9) | –0.1 (–0.7, 0.5) | 0.2 (–0.4, 0.9) | –1.4 (–2.7, –0.2) | 0.02 | |||||
| p,p´-DDE | 0.0 (–0.4, 0.3) | –0.2 (–0.5, 0.1) | 0.0 (–0.4, 0.3) | –0.4 (–1.0, 0.1) | 0.22 | |||||
| Freedom from Distractibility (β)d | ||||||||||
| ΣPCB4 | 0.2 (–0.6, 0.9) | –0.1 (–0.9, 0.7) | –0.1 (–1.0, 0.8) | –0.2 (–1.6, 1.2) | 0.91 | |||||
| PCB TEQ | 0.0 (–0.5, 0.6) | 0.0 (–0.6, 0.5) | 0.0 (–0.6, 0.6) | –0.2 (–1.4, 0.9) | 0.68 | |||||
| p,p´-DDE | –0.1 (–0.4, 0.2) | –0.1 (–0.3, 0.2) | –0.2 (–0.5, 0.2) | 0.1 (–0.4, 0.6) | 0.40 | |||||
| Sex-specific estimates are from a single model (total n = x). aBeta (linear regression model) or rate ratio (negative binomial regression model) for an IQR (ΣPCB4 = 0.19 ng/g, PCB TEQ = 1.00 pg/g lipid, p,p´-DDE = 0.27 ng/g) increase in exposure. bCPT models were adjusted for child’s age at examination, sex, and birth year; maternal age at birth and prenatal smoking; and maternal and paternal education. WISC-III models were adjusted for child’s age at examination and sex and maternal age at birth, prenatal smoking, intelligence, and education; a higher WISC-III score indicates better performance. cSex interaction p-value is based on a likelihood ratio test. dFor Freedom from Distractibility, unadjusted n = 583. | ||||||||||
Figure 1Unadjusted scatterplots and adjusted negative binomial regression lines of the association between cord serum levels of ΣPCB4 and errors of omission on the CPT by sex for 8-year-old children born in New Bedford, 1993–1998, adjusted for child’s age at examination, sex, and birth year; maternal age at birth and prenatal smoking; and maternal and paternal education. Adjusted rate ratios: females, 0.95 (95% CI: 0.86, 1.05); males, 1.11 (95% CI: 0.98, 1.27).
Association between ΣPCB4 (ng/g) and CPT measures of attention and impulse control by block period for all children and by sex for 8-year-old children born in New Bedford, 1993–1998: adjusted modela [IQRb (95% CI)].
| Outcome measure | All children (n = 512) | Females (n = 254) | Males (n = 258) | Sex interaction p-valuec | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reaction time (β) | ||||||||
| Block 2 | –4.1 (–8.8, 0.7) | –6.5 (–11.9, –1.1) | 2.0 (–6.0, 10.1) | 0.07 | ||||
| Block 3 | –2.5 (–7.2, 2.2) | –5.4 (–10.7, 0.0) | 4.5 (–3.5, 12.4) | 0.03 | ||||
| Block 4 | –2.7 (–7.3, 2.0) | –5.3 (–10.7, 0.0) | 3.9 (–4.0, 11.8) | 0.05 | ||||
| Reaction time variability (β) | ||||||||
| Block 2 | –0.3 (–3.0, 2.3) | –1.3 (–4.3, 1.7) | 2.0 (–2.5, 6.5) | 0.21 | ||||
| Block 3 | 1.1 (–1.7, 3.8) | 0.3 (–2.8, 3.5) | 2.9 (–1.8, 7.5) | 0.36 | ||||
| Block 4 | 0.0 (–2.8, 2.8) | –1.4 (–4.7, 1.8) | 3.6 (–1.2, 8.4) | 0.07 | ||||
| Errors of omission (rate ratio) | ||||||||
| Block 2 | 1.00 (0.90, 1.12) | 0.95 (0.82, 1.10) | 1.08 (0.91, 1.27) | 0.23 | ||||
| Block 3 | 1.04 (0.94, 1.14) | 0.98 (0.87, 1.10) | 1.15 (0.99, 1.33) | 0.07 | ||||
| Block 4 | 0.98 (0.88, 1.09) | 0.90 (0.78, 1.05) | 1.08 (0.93, 1.26) | 0.07 | ||||
| Errors of commission (rate ratio) | ||||||||
| Block 2 | 1.00 (0.92, 1.07) | 1.03 (0.94, 1.12) | 0.94 (0.83, 1.06) | 0.21 | ||||
| Block 3 | 0.97 (0.87, 1.08) | 0.85 (0.72, 1.01) | 1.10 (0.95, 1.27) | 0.01 | ||||
| Block 4 | 1.05 (0.96, 1.14) | 1.05 (0.94, 1.16) | 1.05 (0.91, 1.20) | 0.98 | ||||
| Sex-specific estimates are from a single model (total n = x). aAdjusted for child’s age at examination, sex, and birth year; maternal age at birth and prenatal smoking; and maternal and paternal education. bBeta or rate ratio for an IQR increase in exposure. cSex interaction p-value is based on a likelihood ratio test. | ||||||||
Figure 2Unadjusted scatterplots and adjusted linear regression lines of the association between cord serum levels of ΣPCB4 and processing speed on the WISC-III by sex for 8-year-old children born in New Bedford, 1993–1998, adjusted for child’s age at examination and sex, maternal age at birth and prenatal smoking, and maternal intelligence and maternal education. Adjusted β-values: females, 0.0 (95% CI: –1.0, 1.1); males, –2.0 (95% CI: –3.5, –0.4).