Literature DB >> 22357080

Locked plating of periprosthetic femur fractures above total knee arthroplasty.

Zhiyong Hou1, Thomas R Bowen, Kaan Irgit, Kent Strohecker, Michelle E Matzko, James Widmaier, Wade R Smith.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fractures of the femur above a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are becoming increasingly common in the osteoporotic, aging populations of developed countries. Treatment of these fractures is complicated by the presence of a knee prosthesis, frequently limiting the bone available for distal fracture fixation. The recent application of minimally invasive surgical techniques and locked plate technology to this problem offers the promise of stable, fixed-angle fixation of small distal fracture fragments with limited surgical exposure. The purpose of this study is to report the clinical and radiographic outcomes of fracture fixation using this technique in patients with periprosthetic femur fractures above TKA.
METHODS: Fifty-three patients presenting with periprosthetic femur fractures above a TKA were treated with osteosynthesis. One patient was lost to follow-up resulting in 52 patients with complete data. Thirty-four patients were treated with plate fixation and 18 patients underwent retrograde intramedullary nail fixation (RIMN). Using a comprehensive electronic medical record, we recorded data regarding patient-related demographics, nature of the fractures, the operative treatment, and clinical and radiographic outcomes for all patients treated with osteosynthesis.
RESULTS: Successful fracture healing occurred in 75% of patients (39 of 52). Mean operating time was 91.6 ± 6.8 minutes in the RIMN group and 87.4 ± 6.4 minutes in the locked plating (LP) group (P = 0.46). Mean intraoperative blood loss was 182 ± 31.6 mL in the RIMN group and 177.5 ± 23.4 mL in the LP group (P = 0.91). The mean time to bone union was 3.7 ± 0.30 months in the RIMN group and 4.0 ± 0.27 months in the LP group (P = 0.95). The most common cause of treatment failure was patient death within 6 months (9 patients [17%]); three of 18 were treated with a nail and 6 of 34 with a plate (P = 1.0). In the LP group, three (9%) sustained fracture nonunions, three (9%) sustained fracture malunions, and two (6%) sustained surgical site infections. In the RIMN group, one (6%) failed to unite as a result of infection and two (11%) developed fracture malunions. There were no significant differences between patients treated with LP and those treated with RIMN.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite significant advances in surgical technique and implant design, the treatment of periprosthetic femur fractures above a TKA remains a challenge. LP using an indirect reduction technique is applicable to most patients and prosthetic designs and can provide similar favorable results as compared with treatment with a RIMN in periprosthetic femoral fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22357080     DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31822c050b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  23 in total

1.  Healing results of periprosthetic distal femur fractures treated with far cortical locking technology: a preliminary retrospective study.

Authors:  Zachary Ries; Kirk Hansen; Michael Bottlang; Steven Madey; Daniel Fitzpatrick; J L Marsh
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2013

Review 2.  [Treatment of periprosthetic and peri-implant fractures : modern plate osteosynthesis procedures].

Authors:  M J Raschke; R Stange; C Kösters
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 3.  [Treatment of periprosthetic and peri-implant fractures : modern plate osteosynthesis procedures].

Authors:  M J Raschke; R Stange; C Kösters
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Outcome of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip replacement treated with polyaxial locking plate.

Authors:  M F Hoffmann; S Lotzien; T A Schildhauer
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-09-06

5.  Early complications and reoperation rates are similar amongst open reduction internal fixation, intramedullary nail, and distal femoral replacement for periprosthetic distal femur fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  David A Quinzi; Gabriel Ramirez; Nathan B Kaplan; Thomas G Myers; Caroline P Thirukumaran; Benjamin F Ricciardi
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  Locked plate versus retrograde intramedullary nail for periprosthetic femur fractures above total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bo Li; Peng Gao; Guixing Qiu; Tao Li
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures above total knee arthroplasty: comparison of the locking and non-locking plating methods.

Authors:  Dae Kyung Bae; Sang Jun Song; Kyoung Ho Yoon; Tae Yong Kim
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 8.  Similar outcomes of locking compression plating and retrograde intramedullary nailing for periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures following total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Young-Soo Shin; Hyun-Jung Kim; Dae-Hee Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-02-20       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Periprosthetic fractures of the distal femur following total knee arthroplasty: even very distal fractures can be successfully treated using internal fixation.

Authors:  Wanlim Kim; Joo Ho Song; Jung-Jae Kim
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  The outcome and complications of the locked plating management for the periprosthetic distal femur fractures after a total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ashok S Gavaskar; Naveen Chowdary Tummala; Muthukumar Subramanian
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2013-05-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.