Literature DB >> 22356953

Concurrent and face validity of a capsulorhexis simulation with respect to human patients.

P Pat Banerjee1, Deepak P Edward, Shun Liang, Charles S Bouchard, Paul J Bryar, Richard Ahuja, Phillip Dray, Daniel P Bailey.   

Abstract

A prototype version of the ImmersiveTouch® virtual reality simulator was applied to capsulorhexis, the creation of circular tear or "rhexis" in the lens capsule of the eye during cataract surgery. Virtual and live surgery scores by residents were compared. The same three metrics are used in each mode: circularity of the rhexis, duration of surgery (sec), and number of forceps grabs of the capsule per completed rhexis (fewer is better). The average simulator circularity score correlated closely with the average live score (P = 0.0002; N = 4), establishing "concurrent validity" for this metric. Individuals performed similarly to each other in both modes, as shown by the low standard deviations for average circularity (virtual 0.92 ± 0.04; live 0.88 ± 0.04). By contrast, the standard deviations are high for the other two metrics, capsulorhexis duration (virtual 96.91 ± 44.23 sec; live 94.42 ± 65.74 sec, N = 8) and number of forceps grabs (virtual 10.66 ± 4.81; live 10.31 ± 5.23, N = 8). Nevertheless, the simulator was able to demonstrate that the surgeons with wide variations in total duration and number of capsular grabs in 2 to 4 trials of simulated surgery also had similar variations in live surgery, so that the simulator retains some realism or "face validity."

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22356953

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform        ISSN: 0926-9630


  7 in total

Review 1.  Virtual reality training for cataract surgery operating performance in ophthalmology trainees.

Authors:  John C Lin; Zane Yu; Ingrid U Scott; Paul B Greenberg
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-12-21

2.  The use of a virtual reality surgical simulator for cataract surgical skill assessment with 6 months of intervening operating room experience.

Authors:  Shameema Sikder; Jia Luo; P Pat Banerjee; Cristian Luciano; Patrick Kania; Jonathan C Song; Eman S Kahtani; Deepak P Edward; Abdul-Elah Al Towerki
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-01-20

3.  Does Cataract Surgery Simulation Correlate with Real-life Experience?

Authors:  Ayşe Bozkurt Oflaz; Bengü Ekinci Köktekir; Süleyman Okudan
Journal:  Turk J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-06-29

4.  Essentials of setting up a wet lab for ophthalmic surgical training in COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Deepak Mishra; Karan Bhatia; Lalit Verma
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.848

5.  Effectiveness of simulation-based training for manual small incision cataract surgery among novice surgeons: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Akshay Gopinathan Nair; Chetan Ahiwalay; Ashish E Bacchav; Tejas Sheth; Van Charles Lansingh; S Swaroop Vedula; Venudhar Bhatt; Jagadesh C Reddy; Pravin K Vadavalli; Smita Praveen; Nikhilesh Anil Wairagade; Jeff Pettey
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Virtual reality simulator for vitreoretinal surgery using integrated OCT data.

Authors:  Igor Kozak; Pat Banerjee; Jia Luo; Cristian Luciano
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03-31

Review 7.  A systematic review of simulation-based training tools for technical and non-technical skills in ophthalmology.

Authors:  Roxanne Lee; Nicholas Raison; Wai Yan Lau; Abdullatif Aydin; Prokar Dasgupta; Kamran Ahmed; Shreya Haldar
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 3.775

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.